L.D. Gruppen is professor, Department of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan. O. ten Cate is professor of medical education, Center for Research and Development of Education, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands. L.A. Lingard is professor, Department of Medicine, and director, Centre for Education Research & Innovation, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada. P.W. Teunissen is professor, School of Health Professions Education, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands, and maternal fetal medicine specialist, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. J.R. Kogan is professor of medicine, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Acad Med. 2018 Mar;93(3S Competency-Based, Time-Variable Education in the Health Professions):S17-S21. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002066.
Competency-based, time-variable medical education has reshaped the perceptions and practices of teachers, curriculum designers, faculty developers, clinician educators, and program administrators. This increasingly popular approach highlights the fact that learning among different individuals varies in duration, foundation, and goal. Time variability places particular demands on the assessment data that are so necessary for making decisions about learner progress. These decisions may be formative (e.g., feedback for improvement) or summative (e.g., decisions about advancing a student). This article identifies challenges to collecting assessment data and to making assessment decisions in a time-variable system. These challenges include managing assessment data, defining and making valid assessment decisions, innovating in assessment, and modeling the considerable complexity of assessment in real-world settings and richly interconnected social systems. There are hopeful signs of creativity in assessment both from researchers and practitioners, but the transition from a traditional to a competency-based medical education system will likely continue to create much controversy and offer opportunities for originality and innovation in assessment.
基于能力的、时变的医学教育已经改变了教师、课程设计者、教师发展人员、临床教育者和项目管理者的观念和实践。这种越来越受欢迎的方法强调了一个事实,即不同个体的学习在持续时间、基础和目标上存在差异。时变性对评估数据提出了特殊要求,这些数据对于做出关于学习者进展的决策是非常必要的。这些决策可以是形成性的(例如,改进的反馈),也可以是总结性的(例如,决定是否推进学生)。本文确定了在时变系统中收集评估数据和做出评估决策所面临的挑战。这些挑战包括管理评估数据、定义和做出有效的评估决策、创新评估方法,以及在现实环境和复杂的互联社会系统中对评估的复杂性进行建模。评估方面的研究人员和实践者都表现出了创造力的希望,但从传统的以能力为基础的医学教育系统过渡,可能仍会引发很多争议,并为评估的原创性和创新性提供机会。