基于社区的支持对接受抗逆转录病毒治疗的青少年的有效性和成本效益:南非的一项运营研究。

The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of community-based support for adolescents receiving antiretroviral treatment: an operational research study in South Africa.

机构信息

Kheth'Impilo, Cape Town, South Africa.

The South African Department of Science and Technology/National Research Foundation (DST-NRF), Centre of Excellence in Epidemiological Modelling and Analysis (SACEMA), Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.

出版信息

J Int AIDS Soc. 2018 Feb;21 Suppl 1(Suppl Suppl 1). doi: 10.1002/jia2.25041.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Adolescents and youth receiving antiretroviral treatment (ART) in sub-Saharan Africa have high attrition and inadequate ART outcomes, and evaluations of interventions improving ART outcomes amongst adolescents are very limited. Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) target 3c is to substantially increase the health workforce in developing countries. We measured the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of community-based support (CBS) provided by lay health workers for adolescents and youth receiving ART in South Africa.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study including adolescents and youth who initiated ART at 47 facilities. Previously unemployed CBS-workers provided home-based ART-related education, psychosocial support, symptom screening for opportunistic infections and support to access government grants. Outcomes were compared between participants who received CBS plus standard clinic-based care versus participants who received standard care only. Cumulative incidences of all-cause mortality and loss to follow-up (LTFU), adherence measured using medication possession ratios (MPRs), CD4 count slope, and virological suppression were analysed using multivariable Cox, competing-risks regression, generalized estimating equations and mixed-effects models over five years of ART. An expenditure approach was used to determine the incremental cost of CBS to usual care from a provider perspective. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated as annual cost per patient-loss (through death or LTFU) averted.

RESULTS

Amongst 6706 participants included, 2100 (31.3%) received CBS. Participants who received CBS had reduced mortality, adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 0.52 (95% CI: 0.37 to 0.73; p < 0.0001). Cumulative LTFU was 40% lower amongst participants receiving CBS (29.9%) compared to participants without CBS (38.9%), aHR = 0.60 (95% CI: 0.51 to 0.71); p < 0.0001). The effectiveness of CBS in reducing attrition ranged from 42.2% after one year to 35.9% after five years. Virological suppression was similar after three years, but after five years 18.8% CBS participants versus 37.2% non-CBS participants failed to achieve viral suppression, adjusted odds ratio = 0.24 (95% CI: 0.06 to 1.03). There were no significant differences in MPR or CD4 slope. The cost of CBS was US$49.5/patient/year. The incremental cost per patient-loss averted was US$600 and US$776 after one and two years, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

CBS for adolescents and youth receiving ART was associated with substantially reduced patient attrition, and is a low-cost intervention with reasonable cost-effectiveness that can aid progress towards several health, economic and equality-related SDG targets.

摘要

介绍

在撒哈拉以南非洲,接受抗逆转录病毒治疗 (ART) 的青少年和青年的流失率很高,ART 效果不佳,而评估改善青少年 ART 效果的干预措施非常有限。可持续发展目标 (SDG) 目标 3c 是大幅增加发展中国家的卫生人力。我们评估了南非社区为接受 ART 的青少年和青年提供的以社区为基础的支持 (CBS) 在提高 ART 效果方面的有效性和成本效益。

方法

这是一项回顾性队列研究,包括在 47 个机构开始接受 ART 的青少年和青年。以前未就业的 CBS 工作人员提供了家庭为基础的 ART 相关教育、心理社会支持、机会性感染症状筛查以及支持获得政府赠款。将接受 CBS 和标准诊所为基础的护理的参与者与仅接受标准护理的参与者的所有原因死亡率和失访 (LTFU)、使用药物持有率 (MPR) 测量的依从性、CD4 计数斜率和病毒学抑制进行比较。在五年的 ART 期间,使用多变量 Cox 分析、竞争风险回归、广义估计方程和混合效应模型来分析所有原因死亡率和 LTFU 的累积发生率、CD4 计数斜率和病毒学抑制。从提供者的角度使用支出方法来确定 CBS 相对于常规护理的增量成本。计算每年每个患者损失(通过死亡或 LTFU)的增量成本效益比。

结果

在纳入的 6706 名参与者中,有 2100 名(31.3%)接受了 CBS。接受 CBS 的参与者死亡率降低,调整后的危险比(aHR)为 0.52(95%CI:0.37 至 0.73;p<0.0001)。接受 CBS 的参与者的累积 LTFU 降低了 40%(29.9%),而未接受 CBS 的参与者的 LTFU 为 38.9%,aHR 为 0.60(95%CI:0.51 至 0.71);p<0.0001)。CBS 在减少流失方面的有效性从第一年的 42.2%到第五年的 35.9%不等。在三年内,病毒学抑制情况相似,但五年后,18.8%接受 CBS 的参与者和 37.2%未接受 CBS 的参与者未能实现病毒抑制,调整后的优势比为 0.24(95%CI:0.06 至 1.03)。MPR 或 CD4 斜率没有显著差异。CBS 的成本为每名患者每年 49.5 美元。每年每个患者损失(通过死亡或 LTFU)的增量成本分别为 600 美元和 776 美元,分别在第一年和第二年。

结论

为接受 ART 的青少年和青年提供 CBS 与患者流失率显著降低有关,这是一种低成本干预措施,具有合理的成本效益,可以帮助实现几个健康、经济和平等相关的 SDG 目标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3436/5978711/94a72d4c6fc5/JIA2-21-e25041-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索