Carey Sharon, Kalachov Michelle, Jones Lynn, Koh Cherry
Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Nutrition and Dietetics Group, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Feb 27. doi: 10.1111/jgh.14132.
The aims of this study were to establish consensus on service delivery models for management of Type III intestinal failure (IF) and home parenteral nutrition (HPN) within the Australian health-care system and to identify barriers and enablers in moving towards this ideal model.
A modified Delphi methodology was utilized to survey experts working in Type III IF HPN. The panel comprised physicians, dietitians, nurses, and pharmacists from 18 of the 20 adult Type III IF HPN centres across Australia. The study consisted of two rounds of email administered questionnaires developed around four key areas of health service delivery: access to services, clinical care, service guidance, and models of care. Open-ended responses were evaluated via an inductive thematic approach to identify areas of consensus. Experts reviewed the final report to consolidate consensus and validity.
There was >80% consensus that an ideal team should consist of a physician, nurse, dietitian, pharmacist, and access to psychological support. Consensus supported the need for updated guidelines (75%) and a hub and spoke model of care (82%). However, further consultation is required in order to establish consensus around the use of HPN in the palliative oncology setting (69%).
This consensus provides a framework within which health professionals, managers, policy-makers, and consumer groups can move towards optimal management for Type III IF HPN patients. Advocacy and a review of service delivery across Australia are now required to facilitate the ideal model of care identified.
本研究旨在就澳大利亚医疗体系中Ⅲ型肠衰竭(IF)管理及家庭肠外营养(HPN)的服务提供模式达成共识,并确定实现这一理想模式的障碍与促进因素。
采用改良的德尔菲法对从事Ⅲ型IF HPN工作的专家进行调查。该小组由来自澳大利亚20个成人Ⅲ型IF HPN中心中18个中心的医生、营养师、护士和药剂师组成。该研究包括两轮通过电子邮件发放的问卷,问卷围绕医疗服务提供的四个关键领域展开:服务可及性、临床护理、服务指导和护理模式。通过归纳主题法对开放式回答进行评估,以确定共识领域。专家们审查了最终报告以巩固共识和有效性。
超过80%的人达成共识,认为理想的团队应包括一名医生、一名护士、一名营养师、一名药剂师,并能获得心理支持。共识支持需要更新指南(75%)和采用中心辐射型护理模式(82%)。然而,为了就姑息肿瘤学环境中HPN的使用达成共识,还需要进一步协商(69%)。
这一共识提供了一个框架,卫生专业人员、管理人员、政策制定者和消费者团体可在此框架内朝着Ⅲ型IF HPN患者的最佳管理迈进。现在需要进行宣传并对澳大利亚各地的服务提供情况进行审查,以促进所确定的理想护理模式。