Carey Sharon, Cao Rena H M, Moore Dayna, Cunich Michelle
Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Nutrition and Dietetics Department, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Nutr Diet. 2025 Sep;82(4):357-362. doi: 10.1111/1747-0080.70010. Epub 2025 Mar 26.
There is limited understanding about the cost of managing individuals requiring home parenteral nutrition within an outpatient setting. This study aimed to quantify healthcare costs of managing home parenteral nutrition (at-home and within the multidisciplinary outpatient clinic setting) and compare incurred costs against an activity-based funding model.
A 12-month retrospective study compared parenteral nutrition at-home costs and outpatient clinic costs to funding reimbursement. Costing data were retrieved from electronic medical records and monthly hospital finance reports for 28 individuals that required home parenteral nutrition at a quaternary hospital in Sydney, Australia. Hospital remuneration was calculated. Data are presented as median and range.
Individuals on home parenteral nutrition attended a median (range) of 4 (3-7) multidisciplinary outpatient appointments over the year, where one outpatient appointment cost AU$294.51, less than the reimbursement of AU$366.37 based on the funding model allowing for medical billing; and AU$560.55 for activity-based funding where additional loading was added for multidisciplinary input. The median at-home costs per individual per month were AU$6949.86 (AU$2951.64 to AU$15015.77), compared to the funding model reimbursement of AU$7374.64 per individual per month.
The current healthcare funding model sufficiently covers home parenteral nutrition multidisciplinary outpatient service costs as well as at-home costs within this single-site study. This is likely due to the routine use of ready-to-hang 3-in-1 parenteral nutrition solutions. Further multicentre research is needed to better understand funding, corroborate the findings of this study, and inform future funding revisions.
对于在门诊环境中管理需要家庭肠外营养的个体的成本,人们了解有限。本研究旨在量化管理家庭肠外营养(在家中和多学科门诊环境中)的医疗成本,并将产生的成本与基于活动的资助模式进行比较。
一项为期12个月的回顾性研究,将肠外营养的家庭成本和门诊成本与资金报销进行比较。成本数据从澳大利亚悉尼一家四级医院28名需要家庭肠外营养的个体的电子病历和月度医院财务报告中获取。计算了医院薪酬。数据以中位数和范围表示。
接受家庭肠外营养的个体一年中多学科门诊预约的中位数(范围)为4次(3 - 7次),一次门诊预约费用为294.51澳元,低于基于允许医疗计费的资助模式报销的366.37澳元;基于活动的资助为560.55澳元,其中为多学科投入增加了额外费用。每位个体每月的家庭成本中位数为6949.86澳元(2951.64澳元至15015.77澳元),而资助模式报销为每位个体每月7374.64澳元。
在这项单中心研究中,当前的医疗资助模式足以覆盖家庭肠外营养多学科门诊服务成本以及家庭成本。这可能是由于常规使用即挂即用的三合一肠外营养溶液。需要进一步开展多中心研究,以更好地了解资助情况,证实本研究结果,并为未来的资助修订提供参考。