Dubey Amitesh, Yadav Nishtha, Ratre Shailendra, Parihar Vijay Singh, Yadav Yad Ram
Department of Neurosurgery, NSCB Medical College, Jabalpur, India.
Department of Radiology and Imaging, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, India.
World Neurosurg. 2018 May;113:e612-e617. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.02.108. Epub 2018 Feb 25.
Although most surgeons are using endoscopy as an adjunct to microscopy in microvascular decompression, a full endoscopic technique is less commonly performed. The present study is aimed to evaluate results of 230 patients of endoscopic vascular decompression.
A retrospective study was carried out in a tertiary care hospital. Patients with typical neuralgia, with or without preoperatively detected vascular compression, were advised to undergo vascular decompression.
Maxillary and mandibular division were involved in 116 and 93 patients, respectively. Superior cerebellar (n = 174) artery was most common vascular conflict followed by anterior inferior cerebellar artery (n = 96). Tortuous basilar artery and small veins were possible causes of neuralgia in 1 and 2 patients, respectively. Single- and double-vessel conflict were observed in 173 and 50 patients, respectively. The compressing vessel was placed anterior to the trigeminal nerve in 39 patients. An arterial loop was in contact with the nerve, producing grooving, and displacing the nerve in 215, 35, and 21 patients, respectively. Complete, satisfactory, and no relief of pain were observed in 204 (88.7%), 11 (5.8%), and 15 (6.5%) patients, respectively. Recurrence was observed in 25 patients at an average follow-up of 60 months. Temporary complications included trigeminal dysesthesia, vertigo, facial paresis, CSF leak, and reduced hearing in 9, 8, 8, 7, and 3 patients, respectively.
Endoscopic vascular decompression is a safe and efficient alternative technique to endoscopic assisted microvascular decompression provided surgeon is experienced in endoscopic surgery. It is helpful in identification of all offending vessels including the double vessel, and anterior compression without brain and nerve retraction.
尽管大多数外科医生在微血管减压术中使用内镜作为显微镜的辅助手段,但全内镜技术的应用较少。本研究旨在评估230例内镜下血管减压术患者的治疗结果。
在一家三级医疗机构进行了一项回顾性研究。建议患有典型神经痛、术前检测到或未检测到血管压迫的患者接受血管减压术。
上颌支和下颌支受累患者分别为116例和93例。小脑上动脉(n = 174)是最常见的血管冲突,其次是小脑前下动脉(n = 96)。1例和2例患者中,迂曲的基底动脉和小静脉分别可能是神经痛的原因。分别在173例和50例患者中观察到单血管和双血管冲突。39例患者中,压迫血管位于三叉神经前方。动脉襻分别与神经接触、产生压迹并使神经移位的患者有215例、35例和21例。分别有204例(88.7%)、11例(5.8%)和15例(6.5%)患者疼痛完全缓解、部分缓解和未缓解。平均随访60个月时,25例患者出现复发。临时并发症包括三叉神经感觉异常、眩晕、面部轻瘫、脑脊液漏和听力下降,分别有9例、8例、8例、z7例和3例患者出现。
对于有内镜手术经验的外科医生而言,内镜下血管减压术是一种安全有效的替代技术,可替代内镜辅助微血管减压术。它有助于识别所有致病血管,包括双血管以及无需牵拉脑和神经的前方压迫。