• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

瑞典精神分裂症谱系障碍患者和非精神病个体人格特质五年稳定性研究:使用瑞典大学人格量表进行的研究。

Stability of personality traits over a five-year period in Swedish patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorder and non-psychotic individuals: a study using the Swedish universities scales of personality.

机构信息

Human Brain Informatics (HUBIN), Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Centre for Psychiatric Research, Psychiatry Section, Karolinska Institutet and Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

Division of Psychology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Feb 27;18(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1617-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12888-018-1617-y
PMID:29486736
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6389041/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Personality is considered as an important aspect in persons with psychotic disorders. Several studies have investigated personality in schizophrenia. However, no study has investigated stability of personality traits exceeding three years in patients with schizophrenia. This study aims to investigate the stability of personality traits over a five-year period among patients with schizophrenia and non-psychotic individuals and to evaluate case-control differences.

METHODS

Patients with psychotic disorders (n = 36) and non-psychotic individuals (n = 76) completed Swedish universities Scales of Personality (SSP) at two occasions five years apart. SSP scores were analysed for effect of time and case-control differences by multiple analysis of covariance (MANCOVA) and within-subjects correlation.

RESULTS

MANCOVA within-subjects analysis did not show any effect of time. Thus, SSP mean scale scores did not significantly vary during the five-year interval. Within subject correlations (Spearman) ranged 0.30-0.68 and 0.54-0.75 for the different SSP scales in patients and controls, respectively. Patients scored higher than controls in SSP scales Somatic Trait Anxiety, Psychic Trait Anxiety, Stress Susceptibility, Lack of Assertiveness, Detachment, Embitterment, and Mistrust.

CONCLUSION

The stability of the SSP personality trait was reasonably high among patients with psychotic disorder, although lower than among non-psychotic individuals, which is in accordance with previous research.

摘要

背景

人格被认为是精神病患者的一个重要方面。有几项研究调查了精神分裂症患者的人格。然而,尚无研究调查精神分裂症患者的人格特质在三年以上的稳定性。本研究旨在调查精神分裂症患者和非精神病个体的人格特质在五年期间的稳定性,并评估病例对照差异。

方法

36 名精神障碍患者(n=36)和 76 名非精神病个体(n=76)在相隔五年的两个时间点完成了瑞典大学人格量表(SSP)。通过多元协方差分析(MANCOVA)和被试内相关对 SSP 评分进行时间和病例对照差异的分析。

结果

MANCOVA 被试内分析未显示时间的任何影响。因此,在五年的间隔内,SSP 平均量表评分没有显著变化。在患者和对照组中,不同 SSP 量表的被试内相关性(Spearman)分别为 0.30-0.68 和 0.54-0.75。患者在 SSP 量表的躯体特质焦虑、精神特质焦虑、应激易感性、缺乏自信、冷漠、怨恨和不信任方面的得分高于对照组。

结论

尽管低于非精神病个体,但精神障碍患者的 SSP 人格特质稳定性相当高,这与之前的研究一致。

相似文献

1
Stability of personality traits over a five-year period in Swedish patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorder and non-psychotic individuals: a study using the Swedish universities scales of personality.瑞典精神分裂症谱系障碍患者和非精神病个体人格特质五年稳定性研究:使用瑞典大学人格量表进行的研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Feb 27;18(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1617-y.
2
Personality traits in established schizophrenia: aspects of usability and differences between patients and controls using the Swedish universities Scales of Personality.已确诊精神分裂症患者的人格特质:使用瑞典大学人格量表评估的可用性方面及患者与对照组之间的差异
Nord J Psychiatry. 2016 Aug;70(6):462-9. doi: 10.3109/08039488.2016.1159331. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
3
Thirteen-year follow-up of long-term treated psychotic disorder: personality aspects.长期治疗的精神病障碍 13 年随访:人格方面。
Nord J Psychiatry. 2022 Jul;76(5):386-393. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2021.1981436. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
4
Three year stability of Five-Factor Model personality traits in relation to changes in symptom levels in patients with schizophrenia or related disorders.五因素人格特质在精神分裂症或相关障碍患者症状水平变化中的三年稳定性。
Psychiatry Res. 2015 Sep 30;229(1-2):539-44. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2015.05.057. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
5
Personality traits in schizophrenia and related personality disorders.精神分裂症及相关人格障碍中的人格特质。
Psychiatry Res. 2005 Jan 30;133(1):23-33. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2004.09.002.
6
Personality traits measured by the Swedish universities Scales of Personality: factor structure and position within the five-factor model in an Estonian sample.由瑞典大学人格量表测量的人格特质:爱沙尼亚样本中的因素结构及在五因素模型中的位置。
Nord J Psychiatry. 2009;63(3):231-6. doi: 10.1080/08039480802571036.
7
Karolinska Scales of Personality, cognition and psychotic symptoms in patients with schizophrenia and healthy controls.精神分裂症患者和健康对照者的卡罗林斯卡人格、认知及精神病性症状量表
Nord J Psychiatry. 2016;70(1):53-61. doi: 10.3109/08039488.2015.1048720. Epub 2015 Jun 18.
8
Swedish universities Scales of Personality (SSP): construction, internal consistency and normative data.瑞典大学人格量表(SSP):编制、内部一致性及常模数据。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2000 Sep;102(3):217-25. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0447.2000.102003217.x.
9
Stability of personality traits in schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder: a pilot project.精神分裂症和分裂情感性障碍中人格特质的稳定性:一个试点项目。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1997 Sep;185(9):549-55. doi: 10.1097/00005053-199709000-00003.
10
A family study of self-reported personality traits and DSM-III-R personality disorders.一项关于自我报告的人格特质与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本(DSM-III-R)人格障碍的家族研究。
Psychiatry Res. 1993 Sep;48(3):243-55. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(93)90075-r.

引用本文的文献

1
The mind possessed: well-being, personality, and cognitive characteristics of individuals regularly experiencing religious possession.被附身的心智:经常经历宗教附身的个体的幸福感、人格和认知特征。
Braz J Psychiatry. 2022 Nov 5;44(5):486-494. doi: 10.47626/1516-4446-2021-2414. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
2
A qualitative study exploring personal recovery meaning and the potential influence of clinical recovery status on this meaning 20 years after a first-episode psychosis.一项探索个人康复意义的定性研究,以及首发精神分裂症 20 年后临床康复状况对这种意义的潜在影响。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2022 Mar;57(3):473-483. doi: 10.1007/s00127-021-02121-w. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
3
Swedish Universities Scales of Personality: Relation to Other Personality Instruments.瑞典大学人格量表:与其他人格测量工具的关系。
Psychiatry Investig. 2021 May;18(5):373-384. doi: 10.30773/pi.2020.0052. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
4
Validity and utility of Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): I. Psychosis superspectrum.精神病理学层次分类法(HiTOP)的有效性和实用性:I. 精神病超谱
World Psychiatry. 2020 Jun;19(2):151-172. doi: 10.1002/wps.20730.
5
An item response theory analysis of the Prodromal Questionnaire-Brief Child Version: Developing a screening form that informs understanding of self-reported psychotic-like experiences in childhood.前驱期问卷-儿童简短版的项目反应理论分析:开发一种筛查表,以帮助理解儿童自述的类精神病体验。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2020 Apr;129(3):293-304. doi: 10.1037/abn0000502. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
6
Correction to: Stability of personality traits over a five-year period in Swedish patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorder and nonpsychotic individuals: a study using the Swedish universities scales of personality.
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Apr 8;19(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2086-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Association between personality traits and Escitalopram treatment efficacy in panic disorder.
Nord J Psychiatry. 2017 Aug;71(6):433-440. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2017.1316772. Epub 2017 May 4.
2
The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A dimensional alternative to traditional nosologies.精神病理学的分层分类法(HiTOP):传统分类法的维度替代方案。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2017 May;126(4):454-477. doi: 10.1037/abn0000258. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
3
Personality traits in established schizophrenia: aspects of usability and differences between patients and controls using the Swedish universities Scales of Personality.已确诊精神分裂症患者的人格特质:使用瑞典大学人格量表评估的可用性方面及患者与对照组之间的差异
Nord J Psychiatry. 2016 Aug;70(6):462-9. doi: 10.3109/08039488.2016.1159331. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
4
Mechanical massage and mental training programmes affect employees' anxiety, stress susceptibility and detachment-a randomised explorative pilot study.机械按摩和心理训练计划对员工焦虑、压力易感性及离职倾向的影响——一项随机探索性试点研究
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2015 Sep 2;15:302. doi: 10.1186/s12906-015-0753-x.
5
Three year stability of Five-Factor Model personality traits in relation to changes in symptom levels in patients with schizophrenia or related disorders.五因素人格特质在精神分裂症或相关障碍患者症状水平变化中的三年稳定性。
Psychiatry Res. 2015 Sep 30;229(1-2):539-44. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2015.05.057. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
6
Karolinska Scales of Personality, cognition and psychotic symptoms in patients with schizophrenia and healthy controls.精神分裂症患者和健康对照者的卡罗林斯卡人格、认知及精神病性症状量表
Nord J Psychiatry. 2016;70(1):53-61. doi: 10.3109/08039488.2015.1048720. Epub 2015 Jun 18.
7
Personality change following internet-based cognitive behavior therapy for severe health anxiety.基于互联网的认知行为疗法治疗严重健康焦虑症后的人格改变。
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 1;9(12):e113871. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113871. eCollection 2014.
8
Personality and risk for postpartum depressive symptoms.个性与产后抑郁症状风险
Arch Womens Ment Health. 2015 Jun;18(3):539-46. doi: 10.1007/s00737-014-0478-8. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
9
Dopamine D1 receptor availability is related to social behavior: a positron emission tomography study.多巴胺D1受体可用性与社会行为有关:一项正电子发射断层扫描研究。
Neuroimage. 2014 Nov 15;102 Pt 2:590-5. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.08.018. Epub 2014 Aug 16.
10
Clinically meaningful change: false positives in the estimation of individual change.临床有意义的变化:个体变化估计中的假阳性。
Psychol Assess. 2014 Jun;26(2):370-83. doi: 10.1037/a0035419. Epub 2014 Feb 3.