Suppr超能文献

瑞典大学人格量表:与其他人格测量工具的关系。

Swedish Universities Scales of Personality: Relation to Other Personality Instruments.

作者信息

Fagerberg Tomas, Söderman Erik, Gustavsson J Petter, Agartz Ingrid, G Jönsson Erik

机构信息

Human Brain Informatics (HUBIN), Centre for Psychiatric Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet & Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm Region, Stockholm, Sweden.

Division of Psychology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Psychiatry Investig. 2021 May;18(5):373-384. doi: 10.30773/pi.2020.0052. Epub 2021 Apr 30.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate associations between Swedish universities Scales of Personality (SSP) and scales of the following personality instruments: Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R axis II screening questionnaire (SCID-II screen), revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R), revised Chapman scales (Chapman) and the psychotic traits questionnaire (STQ).

METHODS

Healthy individuals (n=406) completed self-report personality questionnaires including SSP and at least one more personality inventory. Correlations were calculated between the 13 different SSP subscales as well as SSP's three factors and factors and scales/subscales in SCID-II screen, NEO-PI-R, Chapman and STQ. The main factors of the various instruments were factor analysed. ICC were calculated.

RESULTS

SSP Neuroticism factor correlated with SCID-II cluster C (r=0.71), NEO Neuroticism (r=0.80) and Chapman Social anhedonia (r=0.62). SSP Extraversion factor correlated with NEO Extraversion (r=0.63) and SSP Aggressiveness factor with NEO Agreeableness (r=-0.62). Strong correlations between SSP factors and scales and scales of the other instruments were sparse, although weaker correlations were common.

CONCLUSION

SSP is a useful investigation tool when measuring personality traits related to temperament-like features. SSP partly correlates well to especially three of the NEO-PI-R factors. The different personality inventories are not completely comparable to each other. Instead, they measure personality aspects in partly different ways.

摘要

目的

研究瑞典大学人格量表(SSP)与以下人格测评工具各量表之间的关联:《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第三版修订本》轴II筛查问卷结构化临床访谈(SCID-II筛查)、修订版大五人格量表(NEO-PI-R)、修订版查普曼量表(查普曼量表)以及精神病性特质问卷(STQ)。

方法

406名健康个体完成了包括SSP以及至少一项其他人格测评工具的自评人格问卷。计算了SSP的13个不同分量表以及SSP的三个因子与SCID-II筛查、NEO-PI-R、查普曼量表和STQ中的因子及量表/分量表之间的相关性。对各种测评工具的主要因子进行了因子分析。计算了组内相关系数(ICC)。

结果

SSP神经质因子与SCID-II的C簇(r = 0.71)、NEO神经质(r = 0.80)以及查普曼社交快感缺失(r = 0.62)相关。SSP外向性因子与NEO外向性(r = 0.63)相关,SSP攻击性因子与NEO宜人性(r = -0.62)相关。虽然较弱的相关性较为常见,但SSP因子与其他测评工具的量表之间的强相关性较少。

结论

在测量与气质样特征相关的人格特质时,SSP是一种有用的调查工具。SSP与NEO-PI-R的三个因子部分相关性良好。不同的人格测评工具彼此并非完全可比。相反,它们以部分不同的方式测量人格方面。

相似文献

6
A Japanese translation of the Swedish Universities Scales of Personality.《瑞典高校人格量表》的日译本。
Ups J Med Sci. 2024 Mar 21;129. doi: 10.48101/ujms.v129.10349. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Relationship between Personality and Biological Reactivity to Stress: A Review.人格与应激生物学反应之间的关系:综述
Psychiatry Investig. 2018 Dec;15(12):1100-1114. doi: 10.30773/pi.2018.10.14.2. Epub 2018 Dec 19.
2
Diagnosis and classification of personality disorders: novel approaches.人格障碍的诊断与分类:新方法。
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2019 Jan;32(1):27-31. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000461.
8
Public health significance of neuroticism.神经质的公共卫生意义。
Am Psychol. 2009 May-Jun;64(4):241-56. doi: 10.1037/a0015309.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验