• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实施艾滋病毒预防研究的试验后获取计划。

Implementing post-trial access plans for HIV prevention research.

机构信息

Berman Institute of Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2018 May;44(5):354-358. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2017-104637. Epub 2018 Feb 27.

DOI:10.1136/medethics-2017-104637
PMID:29487116
Abstract

Ethics guidance increasingly recognises that researchers and sponsors have obligations to consider provisions for post-trial access (PTA) to interventions that are found to be beneficial in research. Yet, there is little information regarding whether and how such plans can actually be implemented. Understanding practical experiences of developing and implementing these plans is critical to both optimising their implementation and informing conceptual work related to PTA. This viewpoint is informed by experiences with developing and implementing PTA plans for six large-scale multicentre HIV prevention trials supported by the HIV Prevention Trials Network. These experiences suggest that planning and implementing PTA often involve challenges of planning under uncertainty and confronting practical barriers to accessing healthcare systems. Even in relatively favourable circumstances where a tested intervention medication is approved and available in the local healthcare system, system-level barriers can threaten the viability of PTA plans. The aggregate experience across these HIV prevention trials suggests that simply referring participants to local healthcare systems for PTA will not necessarily result in continued access to beneficial interventions for trial participants. Serious commitments to PTA will require additional efforts to learn from future approaches, measuring the success of PTA plans with dedicated follow-up and further developing normative guidance to help research stakeholders navigate the complex practical challenges of realising PTA.

摘要

伦理学指南越来越多地认识到,研究人员和赞助商有义务考虑对研究中发现有益的干预措施进行试验后获取(PTA)的规定。然而,关于此类计划实际上是否以及如何实施的信息却很少。了解制定和实施这些计划的实际经验对于优化其实施和为与 PTA 相关的概念工作提供信息都至关重要。本观点是基于 HIV 预防试验网络支持的六项大型多中心 HIV 预防试验制定和实施 PTA 计划的经验得出的。这些经验表明,规划和实施 PTA 通常涉及在不确定的情况下进行规划以及面对获取医疗保健系统的实际障碍的挑战。即使在经过测试的干预药物已获得批准并在当地医疗保健系统中可用的相对有利的情况下,系统层面的障碍也可能威胁到 PTA 计划的可行性。这些 HIV 预防试验的综合经验表明,仅仅将参与者转介到当地医疗保健系统进行 PTA,不一定会导致试验参与者继续获得有益的干预措施。对 PTA 的认真承诺将需要进一步努力,从未来的方法中吸取经验教训,通过专门的后续行动来衡量 PTA 计划的成功,并进一步制定规范指南,帮助研究利益相关者应对实现 PTA 的复杂实际挑战。

相似文献

1
Implementing post-trial access plans for HIV prevention research.实施艾滋病毒预防研究的试验后获取计划。
J Med Ethics. 2018 May;44(5):354-358. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2017-104637. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
2
Mind the gap: An empirical study of post-trial access in HIV biomedical prevention trials.注意差距:关于HIV生物医学预防试验中试验后获取情况的实证研究。
Dev World Bioeth. 2015 Aug;15(2):85-97. doi: 10.1111/dewb.12039. Epub 2013 Nov 8.
3
Post-trial Access in Maternal Vaccine Trials.母亲疫苗试验的试验后准入。
Am J Perinatol. 2019 Jul;36(S 02):S41-S47. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1691799. Epub 2019 Jun 25.
4
Subjects' views of obligations to ensure post-trial access to drugs, care and information: qualitative results from the Experiences of Participants in Clinical Trials (EPIC) study.受试者对确保试验后药物、护理及信息可及性的义务的看法:来自临床试验参与者经历(EPIC)研究的定性结果
J Med Ethics. 2009 Mar;35(3):183-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.2008.024711.
5
Stakeholder perspectives on ethical challenges in HIV vaccine trials in South Africa.利益相关者对南非艾滋病毒疫苗试验中伦理挑战的看法。
Dev World Bioeth. 2010 Apr;10(1):11-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2009.00254.x.
6
Because we can: clashes of perspective over researcher obligation in the failed PrEP trials.因为我们可以:失败的 PrEP 试验中研究人员义务的观点冲突。
Dev World Bioeth. 2011 Aug;11(2):63-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2010.00292.x. Epub 2011 Jan 25.
7
Availability of post-trial access in clinical trials: a review of clinical trial protocols submitted to the research ethics board of the University of the Philippines Manila.临床试验后获取的可行性:对提交至菲律宾马尼拉大学研究伦理委员会的临床试验方案的回顾。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2019 Nov;35(11):1849-1855. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2019.1644851. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
8
Forthcoming practical framework for ethics committees and researchers on post-trial access to the trial intervention and healthcare.即将出台的针对伦理委员会和研究人员的实用框架,内容涉及试验结束后获取试验干预措施及医疗保健的相关事宜。
J Med Ethics. 2014 Apr;40(4):217-8. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2013-101398. Epub 2013 May 5.
9
Access to treatment in HIV prevention trials: perspectives from a South African community.参与艾滋病预防试验治疗的机会:南非社区的观点。
Dev World Bioeth. 2010 Aug;10(2):78-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2009.00265.x. Epub 2009 Sep 27.
10
Reciprocity-based reasons for benefiting research participants: most fail, the most plausible is problematic.基于互惠原则使研究参与者受益的理由:大多难以成立,最具合理性的理由也存在问题。
Bioethics. 2014 Nov;28(9):456-71. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12039. Epub 2013 Dec 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Perspectives of stakeholders on post-trial access arrangements in Ethiopia: a qualitative study.埃塞俄比亚利益相关者对试验后获取安排的看法:一项定性研究。
Glob Bioeth. 2025 May 5;36(1):2497599. doi: 10.1080/11287462.2025.2497599. eCollection 2025.
2
Study-to-Clinic Transition and Daily Oral PrEP Access Experiences Among AGYW in Eastern Cape, South Africa: Insights from the Community PrEP Study.南非东开普省青少年女性从研究过渡到临床及每日口服暴露前预防药物获取经历:来自社区暴露前预防药物研究的见解
AIDS Behav. 2025 Apr 17. doi: 10.1007/s10461-025-04718-7.
3
Towards achieving transnational research partnership equity: lessons from implementing adaptive platform trials in low- and middle-income countries.
迈向实现跨国研究伙伴关系公平:在低收入和中等收入国家开展适应性平台试验的经验教训。
Wellcome Open Res. 2023 Dec 6;8:120. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.18915.2. eCollection 2023.
4
Ethical issues in establishing the efficacy and safety of long-acting injectable pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention: the HPTN 083 trial.长效注射型 HIV 暴露前预防药物有效性和安全性的确立中的伦理问题:HPTN 083 试验。
Lancet HIV. 2021 Nov;8(11):e723-e728. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(21)00153-3. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
5
Investigation of post-trial access views among study participants and stakeholders using photovoice and semistructured interviews.使用照片声音法和半结构化访谈对研究参与者和利益相关者的试验后获取观点进行调查。
J Med Ethics. 2021 Jun 25;48(10):712-7. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-107011.
6
Why ethics guidance needs to be updated for contemporary HIV prevention research.为何当代HIV预防研究需要更新伦理指导。
J Int AIDS Soc. 2020 May;23(5):e25500. doi: 10.1002/jia2.25500.