Haider Ali S, Osumah Tijani, Cambron Hawk, Sulhan Suraj, Murshid Fariha, Vayalumkal Steven, Thakur Richa, Khan Umair, Layton Kennith F
Texas A&M College of Medicine.
Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic.
Cureus. 2017 Nov 25;9(11):e1876. doi: 10.7759/cureus.1876.
The two main treatment modalities of acute intracranial aneurysm rupture are endovascular embolization and surgical clipping, each with its own benefits and risks. Endovascular treatment is associated with better outcomes compared to surgical clipping, but is also associated with high recurrence rates. We present the case of a patient with an acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysm, who subsequently underwent partial endovascular coiling acutely, and later underwent flow diversion therapy with the Pipeline Embolization Device. We also review the literature on this topic for further recommendations on treatment options of acute intracranial aneurysm rupture.
急性颅内动脉瘤破裂的两种主要治疗方式是血管内栓塞和手术夹闭,每种方式都有其自身的益处和风险。与手术夹闭相比,血管内治疗的预后更好,但也与高复发率相关。我们报告了一例急性颅内动脉瘤破裂患者的病例,该患者随后急性接受了部分血管内栓塞治疗,后来又使用Pipeline栓塞装置进行了血流导向治疗。我们还回顾了关于该主题的文献,以获取关于急性颅内动脉瘤破裂治疗方案的进一步建议。