Bus Mieke T J, Cernohorsky Paul, de Bruin Daniel M, Meijer Sybren L, Streekstra Geert J, Faber Dirk J, Kamphuis Guido M, Zondervan Patricia J, van Herk Marcel, Laguna Pes Maria P, Grundeken Maik J, Brandt Martin J, de Reijke Theo M, de la Rosette Jean J M C H, van Leeuwen Ton G
University of Amsterdam, Academic Medical Center, Department of Urology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
University of Amsterdam, Academic Medical Center, Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2018 Jan;5(1):017001. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.5.1.017001. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
Minimal invasive endoscopic treatment for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UUT-UC) is advocated in patients with low-risk disease and limited tumor volume. Diagnostic ureterorenoscopy combined with biopsy is the diagnostic standard. This study aims to evaluate two alternative diagnostic techniques for UUT-UC: optical coherence tomography (OCT) and endoluminal ultrasound (ELUS). Following nephroureterectomy, OCT, ELUS, and computed tomography (CT) were performed of the complete nephroureterectomy specimen. Visualization software (AMIRA) was used for reconstruction and coregistration of CT, OCT, and ELUS. Finally, CT was used to obtain exact probe localization. Coregistered OCT and ELUS datasets were compared with histology. Coregistration with three-dimensional CT makes exact data matching possible in this setting to compare histology with OCT and ELUS. In OCT images of normal-appearing renal pelvis and ureter, urothelium, lamina propria, and muscularis were visible. With ELUS, all anatomical layers of the ureter could be distinguished, besides the urothelial layer. ELUS identified suspect lesions, although exact staging and differentiation between noninvasive and invasive lesions were not possible. OCT provides high-resolution imaging of normal ureter and ureter lesions. ELUS, however, is of limited value as it cannot differentiate between noninvasive and invasive tumors.
对于低风险疾病且肿瘤体积有限的上尿路尿路上皮癌(UUT-UC)患者,提倡采用微创内镜治疗。诊断性输尿管肾镜检查联合活检是诊断标准。本研究旨在评估UUT-UC的两种替代诊断技术:光学相干断层扫描(OCT)和腔内超声(ELUS)。在肾输尿管切除术后,对完整的肾输尿管切除标本进行OCT、ELUS和计算机断层扫描(CT)检查。使用可视化软件(AMIRA)对CT、OCT和ELUS进行重建和配准。最后,使用CT获得精确的探头定位。将配准后的OCT和ELUS数据集与组织学结果进行比较。在这种情况下,与三维CT配准可实现精确的数据匹配,以便将组织学与OCT和ELUS进行比较。在外观正常的肾盂和输尿管的OCT图像中,可见尿路上皮、固有层和肌层。使用ELUS时,除了尿路上皮层外,还可区分输尿管的所有解剖层。ELUS可识别可疑病变,尽管无法对非侵袭性和侵袭性病变进行准确分期和鉴别。OCT可提供正常输尿管和输尿管病变的高分辨率成像。然而,ELUS的价值有限,因为它无法区分非侵袭性和侵袭性肿瘤。