Suppr超能文献

机器人手术后肝癌的肿瘤学和手术结果。

Oncological and surgical result of hepatoma after robot surgery.

机构信息

Department of Nursing, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, No. 100, Tzy-you 1st Rd, Kaohsiung, 807, Taiwan.

Division of General and Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, No. 100, Tzy-you 1st Rd, Kaohsiung, 807, Taiwan.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2018 Sep;32(9):3918-3924. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6131-2. Epub 2018 Feb 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Most liver resections are currently performed using an open approach. Robotic hepatectomy has been suggested as a safe and effective approach for hepatocellular carcinoma; however, studies regarding oncological and surgical outcomes are still limited. Accordingly, we performed this study to compare the surgical and oncological outcomes between robotic and open approaches.

METHODS

Between June, 2013 and July, 2016, a total of 63 HCC patients undergoing robotic hepatectomy, and 177 patients undergoing open hepatectomy were included in this study to assess the surgical and oncological outcomes after hepatectomy. The data of demographic, clinical features, hepatitis profile, tumor characters, TNM stage, surgical type, pathological outcomes, and postoperative results were collected prospectively and analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

The demographic and clinical features of patients with HCC in both groups were statistically comparable. The robotic group had longer operative times (296 ± 84 vs. 182 ± 51 min, p = 0.032). The postoperative complications rate was slightly lower in the robotic group (11.1 vs. 15.3%, p = 0.418). The rate of Ro resection was similar in both groups (93.7 vs. 96%, p = 0.56). The length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the robotic group (6.21 ± 2.06 vs. 8.18 ± 6.99 days, p = 0.001). The overall recurrence rate of HCC was lower in the robotic group (27 vs. 37.3%, p = 0.140). The 1, 2, 3 year disease-free survival rates were 72.5, 64.3, and 61.6%, respectively, for the open group, while they were 77.8, 71.9, and 71.9%, respectively, for the robotic group, (p = 0.325). The 1, 2, 3 year overall survival rates were 95.4, 92.3, and 92.3%, respectively, for the open group, while they were 100, 97.7, and 97.7%, respectively, for the robotic group (p = 0.137).

CONCLUSION

Robotic surgery is a safe and feasible procedure for liver resection in selected patients. The oncological and surgical outcomes of robotic hepatectomy were comparable to open surgery. The robotic hepatectomy carried significantly shorter length of hospital stay.

摘要

背景

目前大多数肝切除术都是采用开放式方法进行的。机器人肝切除术已被认为是治疗肝细胞癌的一种安全有效的方法;然而,关于其肿瘤学和手术结果的研究仍然有限。因此,我们进行了这项研究,以比较机器人和开放式方法的手术和肿瘤学结果。

方法

2013 年 6 月至 2016 年 7 月,共有 63 例接受机器人肝切除术的 HCC 患者和 177 例接受开放式肝切除术的患者纳入本研究,以评估肝切除术后的手术和肿瘤学结果。前瞻性收集了人口统计学、临床特征、肝炎谱、肿瘤特征、TNM 分期、手术类型、病理结果和术后结果数据,并进行回顾性分析。

结果

两组 HCC 患者的人口统计学和临床特征均具有统计学可比性。机器人组的手术时间较长(296±84 分钟比 182±51 分钟,p=0.032)。机器人组术后并发症发生率略低(11.1%比 15.3%,p=0.418)。两组 Ro 切除率相似(93.7%比 96%,p=0.56)。机器人组的住院时间明显短于对照组(6.21±2.06 天比 8.18±6.99 天,p=0.001)。机器人组 HCC 的总体复发率较低(27%比 37.3%,p=0.140)。开放组的 1、2、3 年无病生存率分别为 72.5%、64.3%和 61.6%,机器人组分别为 77.8%、71.9%和 71.9%(p=0.325)。开放组的 1、2、3 年总生存率分别为 95.4%、92.3%和 92.3%,机器人组分别为 100%、97.7%和 97.7%(p=0.137)。

结论

机器人手术是一种安全可行的肝切除术,适用于某些患者。机器人肝切除术的肿瘤学和手术结果与开放式手术相当。机器人肝切除术的住院时间明显更短。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验