• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助肝脏大手术:与开放性肝脏大手术相比的手术结果

Robotic major liver resections: Surgical outcomes compared with open major liver resections.

作者信息

Yang Hye Yeon, Rho Seoung Yoon, Han Dai Hoon, Choi Jin Sub, Choi Gi Hong

机构信息

Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2021 Feb 28;25(1):8-17. doi: 10.14701/ahbps.2021.25.1.8.

DOI:10.14701/ahbps.2021.25.1.8
PMID:33649249
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7952658/
Abstract

BACKGROUNDS/AIMS: Laparoscopic major liver resections are still considered innovative procedures despite the recent development of laparoscopic liver surgery. Robotic surgery has been introduced as an innovative system for laparoscopic surgery. In this study, we investigated surgical outcomes after major liver resections using robotic systems.

METHODS

From January 2009 to October 2018, 70 patients underwent robotic major liver resections, which included conventional major liver resections and right sectionectomy. The short-term and long-term outcomes were compared with 252 open major resections performed during the same period.

RESULTS

Operative time was longer in the robotic group (472 min vs. 349 min, <0.001). However, estimated blood loss was lower in the robotic group compared with the open resection group (269 ml vs. 548 ml, =0.009). The overall postoperative complication rate of the robotic group was lower than that of the open resection group (31.4% vs. 58.3%, <0.001), but the major complication rate was similar between the two groups. Hospital stay was shorter in the robotic group (9.5 days vs. 15.1 days, =0.006). Among patients with HCC, cholangiocarcinoma, and colorectal liver metastasis, there was no difference in overall and disease-free survival between the two groups. After propensity score matching in 37 patients with HCC for each group, the robotic group still showed a shorter hospital stay and comparable long-term outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic major liver resections provided improved perioperative outcomes and comparable long-term oncologic outcome compared with open resections. Therefore, robotic surgery should be considered one of the options for minimally invasive major liver resections.

摘要

背景/目的:尽管腹腔镜肝脏手术近年来有所发展,但腹腔镜大肝切除术仍被视为创新手术。机器人手术已作为一种腹腔镜手术的创新系统被引入。在本研究中,我们调查了使用机器人系统进行大肝切除术后的手术结果。

方法

2009年1月至2018年10月,70例患者接受了机器人辅助大肝切除术,包括传统大肝切除术和右半肝切除术。将短期和长期结果与同期进行的252例开放性大肝切除术进行比较。

结果

机器人组的手术时间较长(472分钟对349分钟,<0.001)。然而,机器人组的估计失血量低于开放性切除组(269毫升对548毫升,=0.009)。机器人组的总体术后并发症发生率低于开放性切除组(31.4%对58.3%,<0.001),但两组的主要并发症发生率相似。机器人组的住院时间较短(9.5天对15.1天,=0.006)。在肝癌、胆管癌和结直肠癌肝转移患者中,两组的总生存率和无病生存率无差异。在每组37例肝癌患者进行倾向评分匹配后,机器人组的住院时间仍然较短,长期结果相当。

结论

与开放性切除术相比,机器人辅助大肝切除术改善了围手术期结果,长期肿瘤学结果相当。因此,机器人手术应被视为微创大肝切除术的选择之一。

相似文献

1
Robotic major liver resections: Surgical outcomes compared with open major liver resections.机器人辅助肝脏大手术:与开放性肝脏大手术相比的手术结果
Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2021 Feb 28;25(1):8-17. doi: 10.14701/ahbps.2021.25.1.8.
2
Robotic Versus Open Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Matched Comparison.机器人辅助与开放性肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌的配对比较
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Apr;24(4):1021-1028. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5638-9. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
3
Robotic liver surgery for minor hepatic resections: a comparison with laparoscopic and open standard procedures.用于小范围肝切除术的机器人肝脏手术:与腹腔镜和开放标准手术的比较
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2016 Aug;401(5):707-14. doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1440-1. Epub 2016 May 20.
4
Robotic versus laparoscopic resections of posterosuperior segments of the liver: a propensity score-matched comparison.机器人手术与腹腔镜手术治疗肝后上段切除术:倾向评分匹配比较
Surg Endosc. 2016 Mar;30(3):1004-13. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4284-9. Epub 2015 Jun 27.
5
Robotic Versus Open Minor Liver Resections of the Posterosuperior Segments: A Multinational, Propensity Score-Matched Study.机器人与开放后上段肝脏小部分切除术:一项多国、倾向评分匹配研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Feb;26(2):583-590. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6928-1. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
6
Robotic versus open hemihepatectomy: a propensity score-matched study.机器人与开腹半肝切除术的比较:倾向评分匹配研究。
Surg Endosc. 2021 May;35(5):2316-2323. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07645-x. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
7
Laparoscopic liver resection versus open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: 3-year outcomes of a cohort study with propensity score matching.腹腔镜肝切除术与开腹肝切除术治疗肝内胆管细胞癌:倾向评分匹配队列研究的 3 年结果。
Surg Oncol. 2020 Jun;33:63-69. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2020.01.001. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
8
Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes Following Robotic Liver Resections for Primary Hepatobiliary Malignancies: A Multicenter Study.机器人肝切除术治疗原发性肝胆恶性肿瘤的长期肿瘤学结果:一项多中心研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Sep;25(9):2652-2660. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6629-9. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
9
Oncological and surgical result of hepatoma after robot surgery.机器人手术后肝癌的肿瘤学和手术结果。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Sep;32(9):3918-3924. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6131-2. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
10
Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Hepatectomy: A Single Surgeon Experience of 629 Consecutive Minimally Invasive Liver Resections.机器人与腹腔镜肝切除术:单外科医生微创肝切除 629 例连续经验。
World J Surg. 2023 Sep;47(9):2241-2249. doi: 10.1007/s00268-023-07060-y. Epub 2023 May 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Liver resection in stage 0-A HCC in segments 7/8: a propensity-matched analysis comparing open, laparoscopic, and robotic approach.7/8段0-A期肝癌的肝切除术:一项比较开放、腹腔镜和机器人手术入路的倾向匹配分析
Surg Endosc. 2025 Mar;39(3):1902-1914. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11521-3. Epub 2025 Jan 23.
2
Robotic, laparoscopic, and open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity score matched analysis of perioperative outcomes.肝细胞癌的机器人手术、腹腔镜手术及开腹肝切除术:围手术期结局的倾向评分匹配分析
Surg Pract Sci. 2023 Jun 28;14:100196. doi: 10.1016/j.sipas.2023.100196. eCollection 2023 Sep.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Robotic ICG guided anatomical liver resection in a multi-centre cohort: an evolution from "positive staining" into "negative staining" method.多中心队列中机器人吲哚菁绿引导下的解剖性肝切除术:从“阳性染色”到“阴性染色”方法的演变
HPB (Oxford). 2021 Mar;23(3):475-482. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.08.005. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
2
What are the most important predictive factors for clinically relevant posthepatectomy liver failure after right hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma?对于肝细胞癌右半肝切除术后具有临床相关性的肝切除术后肝衰竭而言,最重要的预测因素有哪些?
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2020 Feb;98(2):62-71. doi: 10.4174/astr.2020.98.2.62. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
3
The First Report on Liver Resection Using the Novel Japanese hinotori™ Surgical Robot System: First Case Series Report of 10 Cases.
首例使用新型日本“火鸟™”手术机器人系统进行肝切除术的报告:10例病例系列报告首篇
J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 21;13(24):7819. doi: 10.3390/jcm13247819.
4
Experience-based transition to robotic surgery in an experienced program in minimally invasive hepatobiliary surgery.在经验丰富的微创肝胆外科项目中,基于经验向机器人手术过渡。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Dec;38(12):7309-7318. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11309-5. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
5
Introduction of day-case robotic liver surgery: a case series from a tertiary hepatobiliary and pancreatic centre.日间手术机器人肝切除术介绍:来自一家三级肝胆胰中心的病例系列。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Aug;38(8):4329-4335. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10913-9. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
6
Outcomes of Robotic Surgery in a Single-institution, High-volume Hepatobiliary Oncology Unit.单机构高容量肝胆肿瘤科室机器人手术的疗效
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2024 May;15(Suppl 2):289-296. doi: 10.1007/s13193-024-01873-6. Epub 2024 Jan 16.
7
Exploring the feasibility of robotic liver resection in a limited resource setting.探讨在资源有限的情况下进行机器人肝切除术的可行性。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Apr 29;18(1):187. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01901-1.
8
International experts consensus guidelines on robotic liver resection in 2023.2023 年国际专家机器人肝切除术共识指南。
World J Gastroenterol. 2023 Aug 28;29(32):4815-4830. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i32.4815.
9
The future of minimally invasive liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma BCLC stage 0-A.肝细胞癌BCLC 0-A期微创肝切除术的未来
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2023 Aug 1;12(4):601-603. doi: 10.21037/hbsn-23-295. Epub 2023 Jul 4.
10
Wingless/It/β-catenin signaling in liver metastasis from colorectal cancer: A focus on biological mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities.Wingless/It/β-catenin 信号通路在结直肠癌肝转移中的作用:聚焦于生物学机制和治疗机会。
World J Gastroenterol. 2023 May 14;29(18):2764-2783. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i18.2764.
Robotic simultaneous resection for colorectal liver metastasis: feasibility for all types of liver resection.
机器人同步切除结直肠肝转移:适用于所有类型的肝切除术。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2019 Nov;404(7):895-908. doi: 10.1007/s00423-019-01833-7. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
4
Laparoscopic versus open major liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative cohort studies.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌的系统评价和荟萃分析:比较队列研究。
BMC Cancer. 2019 Nov 6;19(1):1047. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6240-x.
5
Laparoscopic Versus Open Liver Resection for Benign Tumors and Lesions: A Case Matched Study with Propensity Score Matching.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗良性肿瘤和病变:一项倾向评分匹配的病例对照研究
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019 Dec;29(12):1518-1525. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0427. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
6
Comparison of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for lesions located in posterosuperior segments: a meta-analysis of short-term and oncological outcomes.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗后上叶病灶的比较:短期和肿瘤学结果的荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Dec;33(12):3910-3918. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07071-8. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
7
Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: application of the difficulty scoring system.机器人与腹腔镜肝切除术:难度评分系统的应用。
Surg Endosc. 2020 May;34(5):2000-2006. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06976-8. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
8
Robotic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review.机器人肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌:系统评价。
Int J Med Robot. 2019 Aug;15(4):e2004. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2004. Epub 2019 May 28.
9
Toward a fully robotic surgery: Performing robotic major liver resection with no table-side surgeon.迈向全机器人手术:在无手术台旁外科医生的情况下进行机器人辅助肝大部切除术。
Int J Med Robot. 2019 Apr;15(2):e1985. doi: 10.1002/rcs.1985. Epub 2019 Feb 17.
10
Outcomes of major laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.肝细胞癌的大型腹腔镜肝切除术的结果
Surg Oncol. 2018 Mar;27(1):31-35. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2017.11.006. Epub 2017 Nov 26.