Barai Avijit, Lambie Bruce, Cosgrave Conor, Baxter Joanne
Emergency Department, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Emergency Department, Dunedin Hospital, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Emerg Med Australas. 2018 Aug;30(4):530-537. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12946. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
Distal radius fracture (DRF) is a common presentation to the ED. However, little is known about the long-term functional outcome of these patients following their initial management in the ED.
In order to evaluate the long-term functional outcome of DRF, we collected the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores from the patients who attended our ED with DRF between January 2014 and June 2015. We divided the patients into two groups based on their overall management: (i) conservative group who did not have any surgical interventions; and (ii) open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) group who needed surgical interventions in the theatre. Multiple linear regression models were used to identify the statistically significant predictor variables.
Out of the 229 patients whom we contacted, 128 patients responded. The response rate was 56%. The majority of the patients belonged to the conservative group (n = 87, 75%), while one-quarter of the patients were in the ORIF group (n = 29, 25%). DASH score was higher in the ORIF group (median = 12.1, 95% confidence interval 5.6-25) than the conservative group (median = 6, 95% confidence interval 1.7-16.4). This difference between the groups was statistically significant (unadjusted P = 0.017, Wilcoxon test). Multiple linear regression models revealed that the management group and age of the patients were significant predictors for DASH score.
Conservative management had lower DASH scores signifying better functional outcomes. Further prospective multicentre studies may be suggested to assess the generalisability of the study.
桡骨远端骨折(DRF)是急诊科的常见病症。然而,对于这些患者在急诊科接受初始治疗后的长期功能结局,我们知之甚少。
为了评估DRF的长期功能结局,我们收集了2014年1月至2015年6月期间因DRF就诊于我院急诊科的患者的上肢、肩部和手部功能障碍(DASH)评分。我们根据患者的总体治疗方式将其分为两组:(i)未进行任何手术干预的保守治疗组;(ii)需要在手术室进行手术干预的切开复位内固定(ORIF)组。使用多元线性回归模型来确定具有统计学意义的预测变量。
在我们联系的229名患者中,128名患者给予了回复。回复率为56%。大多数患者属于保守治疗组(n = 87,75%),而四分之一的患者属于ORIF组(n = 29,25%)。ORIF组的DASH评分(中位数 = 12.1,95%置信区间5.6 - 25)高于保守治疗组(中位数 = 6,95%置信区间1.7 - 16.4)。两组之间的这种差异具有统计学意义(未调整P = 0.017,Wilcoxon检验)。多元线性回归模型显示,治疗组和患者年龄是DASH评分的重要预测因素。
保守治疗的DASH评分较低,表明功能结局更好。可能建议进一步开展前瞻性多中心研究,以评估该研究结果的普遍性。