• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

养老机构中导管相关尿路感染预防计划的经济评价。

Economic Evaluation of a Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection Prevention Program in Nursing Homes.

机构信息

Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Apr;66(4):742-747. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15316. Epub 2018 Feb 28.

DOI:10.1111/jgs.15316
PMID:29489017
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6374025/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the economic effect and cost effectiveness of a targeted catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) prevention intervention in the nursing home (NH) setting.

DESIGN

Randomized clinical trial.

SETTING

Community-based NHs (N=12).

PARTICIPANTS

NH residents with indwelling urinary catheters (N=418).

INTERVENTION

Standard care versus infection prevention program involving barrier precautions, active surveillance, and NH staff education.

MEASUREMENTS

Costs of the intervention, costs of disease, and health outcomes were used to calculate an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for the intervention. Data came from intervention results and the literature and outcomes were analyzed over one year.

RESULTS

A 120-bed NH would have program costs of $20,279/year. The cost of disease treatment would be reduced by $54,316 per year, resulting in a $34,037 net cost savings. Most of this savings would come from fewer CAUTI hospitalizations ($39,180), with $15,136 in savings from CAUTI care within the NH. The intervention also yielded a gain of 0.197 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Taking into account uncertainty in all parameters suggests there is an 85% chance that the intervention is cost-saving.

CONCLUSIONS

The CAUTI prevention program is expected to benefit payers by reducing costs and improving health outcomes. Because the savings accrue to payers and not to NHs, payers such as Medicare and private insurers may want to provide incentives for NHs to implement such programs.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01062841.

摘要

目的

评估针对疗养院(NH)中与导管相关的尿路感染(CAUTI)的目标预防干预措施的经济效果和成本效益。

设计

随机临床试验。

设置

以社区为基础的 NH(N=12)。

参与者

NH 中有留置导尿管的居民(N=418)。

干预

标准护理与感染预防计划,包括屏障预防措施、主动监测和 NH 工作人员教育。

测量

干预措施的成本、疾病成本和健康结果用于计算干预措施的增量成本效益比。数据来自干预结果和文献,结果在一年内进行分析。

结果

一家拥有 120 张床位的 NH 每年将有 20279 美元的项目成本。每年治疗疾病的费用将减少 54316 美元,从而节省 34037 美元的净成本。这些节省主要来自于减少 CAUTI 住院治疗(39180 美元),而 NH 内的 CAUTI 护理节省了 15136 美元。该干预措施还获得了 0.197 个质量调整生命年(QALY)。考虑到所有参数的不确定性表明,该干预措施有 85%的可能性具有成本效益。

结论

CAUTI 预防计划有望通过降低成本和改善健康结果使支付方受益。由于节省的费用归支付方所有,而不归 NH 所有,因此 Medicare 和私人保险公司等支付方可能希望为 NH 实施此类计划提供激励措施。

试验注册

clinicaltrials.gov 标识符:NCT01062841。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/312f/6374025/a025b5b6844c/nihms-947914-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/312f/6374025/a025b5b6844c/nihms-947914-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/312f/6374025/a025b5b6844c/nihms-947914-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Economic Evaluation of a Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection Prevention Program in Nursing Homes.养老机构中导管相关尿路感染预防计划的经济评价。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Apr;66(4):742-747. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15316. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
2
A targeted infection prevention intervention in nursing home residents with indwelling devices: a randomized clinical trial.针对留置装置的养老院居民的针对性感染预防干预措施:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 May;175(5):714-23. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.132.
3
Types of urethral catheter for reducing symptomatic urinary tract infections in hospitalised adults requiring short-term catheterisation: multicentre randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of antimicrobial- and antiseptic-impregnated urethral catheters (the CATHETER trial).减少短期导尿住院成人有症状下尿路感染用的尿道导管类型:抗菌和抗菌剂浸渍尿道导管的多中心随机对照试验和经济学评价(CATHETER 试验)。
Health Technol Assess. 2012 Nov;16(47):1-197. doi: 10.3310/hta16470.
4
Nursing interventions to reduce the risk of catheter-associated urinary tract infection: part 2: staff education, monitoring, and care techniques.降低导尿管相关尿路感染风险的护理干预措施:第2部分:人员教育、监测及护理技术
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2009 Mar-Apr;36(2):137-54. doi: 10.1097/01.WON.0000347655.56851.04.
5
Types of indwelling urethral catheters for short-term catheterisation in hospitalised adults.住院成人短期导尿用留置导尿管的类型
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Sep 23;2014(9):CD004013. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004013.pub4.
6
Effect of precision management scheme based on the best evidence summary on reducing catheter-associated urinary tract infection.基于最佳证据总结的精准管理方案对降低导尿管相关尿路感染的效果。
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2023;48(9):1333-1342. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2023.230173.
7
Systematic Review of Interventions to Reduce Urinary Tract Infection in Nursing Home Residents.减少疗养院居民尿路感染干预措施的系统评价
J Hosp Med. 2017 May;12(5):356-368. doi: 10.12788/jhm.2724.
8
Barriers to reducing urinary catheter use: a qualitative assessment of a statewide initiative.减少导尿管使用的障碍:全州范围倡议的定性评估。
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 May 27;173(10):881-6. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.105.
9
Implementation of a Nurse-Driven Protocol for Catheter Removal to Decrease Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection Rate in a Surgical Trauma ICU.实施护士主导的导尿管移除方案以降低外科创伤 ICU 中导管相关尿路感染率。
J Intensive Care Med. 2020 Aug;35(8):738-744. doi: 10.1177/0885066618781304. Epub 2018 Jun 10.
10
A National Implementation Project to Prevent Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection in Nursing Home Residents.一项预防疗养院居民导管相关尿路感染的全国实施项目。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Aug 1;177(8):1154-1162. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.1689.

引用本文的文献

1
A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations in Clinical Nursing Practices.临床护理实践中经济评估的系统评价
J Nurs Manag. 2024 Aug 9;2024:9939254. doi: 10.1155/2024/9939254. eCollection 2024.
2
A systematic review of economic evaluation of healthcare associated infection prevention and control interventions in long term care facilities.长期护理机构中医疗保健相关感染预防与控制干预措施的经济评估系统评价。
Health Econ Rev. 2024 Nov 29;14(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s13561-024-00582-8.
3
Exploring nurses' experiences of social media and in-person educational interventions for professional development: a qualitative study.

本文引用的文献

1
Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Reform of Requirements for Long-Term Care Facilities. Final rule.医疗保险和医疗补助计划;长期护理机构要求的改革。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2016 Oct 4;81(192):68688-872.
2
Assessment of a multi-modal intervention for the prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections.一种预防导管相关尿路感染的多模式干预措施的评估。
J Hosp Infect. 2016 Oct;94(2):175-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2016.07.011. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
3
Elimination of Routine Contact Precautions for Endemic Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus: A Retrospective Quasi-Experimental Study.
探索护士对社交媒体和面对面教育干预促进职业发展的体验:一项定性研究。
BMC Nurs. 2022 May 24;21(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-00903-4.
4
Remote Infection Control Assessments of US Nursing Homes During the COVID-19 Pandemic, April to June 2020.2020 年 4 月至 6 月期间美国养老院针对 COVID-19 疫情的远程感染控制评估。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022 Jun;23(6):909-916.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2022.03.015. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
5
Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections in the Adult Patient Group: A Qualitative Systematic Review on the Adopted Preventative and Interventional Protocols From the Literature.成年患者群体中的导尿管相关尿路感染:对文献中采用的预防和干预方案的定性系统评价
Cureus. 2021 Jul 9;13(7):e16284. doi: 10.7759/cureus.16284. eCollection 2021 Jul.
6
Prospective Surveillance of Healthcare-Associated Infections in Residents in Four Long-Term Care Facilities in Graz, Austria.奥地利格拉茨市四家长期护理机构中住院患者医疗相关感染的前瞻性监测。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 May 7;10(5):544. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10050544.
7
Polymeric Materials with Antibacterial Activity: A Review.具有抗菌活性的聚合物材料:综述
Polymers (Basel). 2021 Feb 18;13(4):613. doi: 10.3390/polym13040613.
8
Method for Economic Evaluation of Bacterial Whole Genome Sequencing Surveillance Compared to Standard of Care in Detecting Hospital Outbreaks.细菌全基因组测序监测与标准护理相比在检测医院感染暴发中的经济评估方法。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Jul 1;73(1):e9-e18. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa512.
9
Role of Post-Acute Care in Readmissions for Preexisting Healthcare-Associated Infections.康复治疗在再次入院的既往医源性感染中的作用。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Feb;68(2):370-378. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16208. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
消除针对地方性耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌和耐万古霉素肠球菌的常规接触预防措施:一项回顾性准实验研究。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016 Nov;37(11):1323-1330. doi: 10.1017/ice.2016.156. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
4
Economic Evaluation of Interventions for Prevention of Hospital Acquired Infections: A Systematic Review.预防医院获得性感染干预措施的经济学评价:系统综述
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 5;11(1):e0146381. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146381. eCollection 2016.
5
A Single-Center Multidisciplinary Initiative to Reduce Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection Rates: Quality and Financial Implications.一项降低导尿管相关尿路感染率的单中心多学科倡议:质量和财务影响
Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2015 Jul-Sep;34(3):218-24. doi: 10.1097/HCM.0000000000000073.
6
Long-Term Care Services in the United States: 2013 Overview.美国长期护理服务:2013年概述
Vital Health Stat 3. 2013 Dec(37):1-107.
7
A targeted infection prevention intervention in nursing home residents with indwelling devices: a randomized clinical trial.针对留置装置的养老院居民的针对性感染预防干预措施:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 May;175(5):714-23. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.132.
8
Cost-effectiveness of strategies to prevent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus transmission and infection in an intensive care unit.重症监护病房预防耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌传播和感染策略的成本效益
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2015 Jan;36(1):17-27. doi: 10.1017/ice.2014.12.
9
A decade of investment in infection prevention: a cost-effectiveness analysis.十年感染预防投资:成本效益分析
Am J Infect Control. 2015 Jan;43(1):4-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2014.07.014.
10
Cost-effectiveness of a quality improvement programme to reduce central line-associated bloodstream infections in intensive care units in the USA.美国一项旨在降低重症监护病房中心静脉导管相关血流感染的质量改进计划的成本效益
BMJ Open. 2014 Sep 25;4(9):e006065. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006065.