Bakonyi M, Berkó S, Budai-Szücs M, KovÁcs A, Spaits T, Samu G, Csanyi E
Acta Pharm Hung. 2017;87(1):3-12.
Transdermal drug delivery is assumed to have a growing importance in drug development recently, thus it is crucial to optimize the penetration properties of drug into through the skin. Most of the current developments rely on the use of appropriate ex vivo animal or artificial models. However, the limited availability of human skin and the increasing restrictions in connection with animal testing encouraged the searchfor suitable artificial skin models.
For the review, we have searched the databases of scientific and medical research to collect the available publications about the in vitro skin models. Furthermore, we overviewed the methods of the DataBase service on ALternative Methods to animal experimentation (DB-ALM) database and the guidelines of Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
In vitro skin models have advantages like reproducibility, relatively low cost, easy storage, uncomplicated handling, and they offer a possibility for rapid screening and faster optimization of skin formulations. Furthermore, their composition can be easily modified which allows studying the relationship between certain pathological conditions and barrier function. However, the limitations of these models are needed to be taken into account.
This review attempts to provide an overview of the most frequently used models, focusing on their limitations and advantages. Accessibility, easiness of the application, cost and the respective limitations have to be considered in order to choose the most appropriate in vitro model for the particular objective.
经皮给药在药物研发中的重要性日益凸显,因此优化药物经皮渗透性能至关重要。目前大多数研究进展依赖于使用合适的离体动物或人工模型。然而,人体皮肤供应有限以及动物实验相关限制日益增多,促使人们寻找合适的人工皮肤模型。
为撰写本综述,我们检索了科学和医学研究数据库,以收集有关体外皮肤模型的现有出版物。此外,我们概述了替代动物实验方法数据库(DB-ALM)的数据服务方法以及经济合作与发展组织(OECD)的指南。
体外皮肤模型具有可重复性、成本相对较低、易于储存、操作简单等优点,并且为皮肤制剂的快速筛选和优化提供了可能。此外,其组成可轻松改变,这有助于研究某些病理状况与屏障功能之间的关系。然而,需要考虑这些模型的局限性。
本综述旨在概述最常用的模型,重点关注其局限性和优点。为特定目标选择最合适的体外模型时,必须考虑可及性、应用的简易程度、成本以及各自的局限性。