Center for the Intrepid, Brooke Army Medical Center, Joint Base San Antonio - Fort Sam Houston, TX, USA.
Baylor University, Doctoral Program in Physical Therapy, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Oct 1;43(19):1313-1321. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002619.
Randomized controlled trial.
The aim of this study was to compare early physical therapy versus usual care in patients with low back pain.
Early physical therapy (PT) has been associated with reduced downstream healthcare utilization in retrospective studies, but not investigated prospectively in the military health system.
Military service members seeking care from a general practitioner were recruited. Patients attended a 20-minute self-management class with focus on psychosocial resilience and then randomized to usual care only (UC) versus immediately starting a 3-week physical therapy program (PT). Primary outcome was the Oswestry Disability Index at 1 year. Secondary outcomes included Oswestry scores at 4- and 12-week follow-up, numeric pain rating scale, global rating of change, and healthcare utilization at 1 year. Analysis of covariance was used to compare differences between groups, significance set at 0.05.
clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01556581 RESULTS.: A total of 119 patients (mean age 27.2 years; mean BMI 27.8 kg/m; 15.1% female) enrolled (61 randomized to UC; 58 to PT). No between-group differences found on the Oswestry after 1 year. A between-group difference in Oswestry was present at 4 weeks (mean difference = 4.4; 95% CI: 0.41-10.1; P = 0.042) favoring PT. Total 1-year mean healthcare costs did not differ significantly between groups (UC $5037; 95 CI $4171-$6082 and PT $5299; 95 CI $4367-$6431). The portion of total mean healthcare costs related to low back pain was lower for UC ($1096; 95% CI $855-$1405) compared to PT ($2016, 95% CI $1570-$2590).
There was no difference between usual care and early PT after 1 year. PT provided greater improvement in disability after 4 weeks. As both groups improved, the impact of the education may have been underestimated. Patients in the PT group utilized greater back-pain-related healthcare resources, but overall healthcare costs did not differ compared to UC.
随机对照试验。
本研究旨在比较腰痛患者的早期物理治疗与常规护理。
回顾性研究表明,早期物理治疗(PT)可降低下游医疗保健的利用率,但在军事卫生系统中尚未进行前瞻性研究。
从全科医生处就诊的现役军人被招募。患者参加了 20 分钟的自我管理课程,重点是心理社会弹性,然后随机分为仅接受常规护理(UC)组或立即开始为期 3 周的物理治疗方案(PT)组。主要结局是 1 年时的 Oswestry 残疾指数。次要结局包括 4 周和 12 周随访时的 Oswestry 评分、数字疼痛评分量表、总体变化评分和 1 年时的医疗保健利用率。采用协方差分析比较组间差异,显著性水平为 0.05。
clinicaltrials.gov:NCT01556581 结果:共有 119 名患者(平均年龄 27.2 岁;平均 BMI 27.8kg/m;15.1%为女性)入组(61 名随机分配至 UC 组;58 名至 PT 组)。1 年后,两组间 Oswestry 无差异。4 周时,PT 组 Oswestry 存在组间差异(平均差异=4.4;95%CI:0.41-10.1;P=0.042)。两组 1 年的平均医疗保健费用无显著差异(UC 组 5037 美元;95%CI:4171-6082 美元和 PT 组 5299 美元;95%CI:4367-6431 美元)。UC 组(95%CI:855-1405 美元)与 PT 组(95%CI:1570-2590 美元)相比,与腰痛相关的总平均医疗保健费用比例较低(1096 美元)。
1 年后,常规护理与早期 PT 之间无差异。PT 在 4 周时可改善残疾程度。由于两组均有所改善,因此可能低估了教育的影响。PT 组患者利用了更多的腰痛相关医疗资源,但与 UC 相比,总体医疗保健费用无差异。
2。