• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三种不同俯式划船练习的力-速度关系。

Force-Velocity Relationship in Three Different Variations of Prone Row Exercises.

机构信息

NAR-Nucleus of High Performance in Sport, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Department of Mechatronics Engineering, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2021 Feb 1;35(2):300-309. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002543.

DOI:10.1519/JSC.0000000000002543
PMID:29489715
Abstract

Loturco, I, Suchomel, T, Kobal, R, Arruda, AFS, Guerriero, A, Pereira, LA, and Pai, CN. Force-velocity relationship in three different variations of prone row exercises. J Strength Cond Res 35(2): 300-309, 2021-This study examined the force-velocity relationship and tested the possibility of determining the relative loading intensity percentage of 1 repetition maximum (%1RM) in 3 different variations of prone row exercises. Thirty male top-level athletes from 2 different sports (National Team rugby union players and professional mixed martial arts fighters) were submitted to maximum dynamic strength assessments in the free prone bench pull, bent-over barbell row, and bent-over Smith machine row, after standard procedures encompassing lifts performed from 40 to 100% of 1RM. The mean velocity, mean propulsive velocity, and peak velocity were measured in all attempts. Linear regression analyses were performed to establish the relationships between the different measures of bar velocities and %1RM. The actual (obtained during the assessments) and predicted 1RM values (based on the predictive equations) for each exercise were compared using a paired t-test. In all exercises, the predicted 1RM scores-based on all velocity variables-were not different from their respective actual values. The close linear relationships between bar velocities and distinct %1RM (coefficient of determination ≥80%, in all experimental conditions) allow precise determination of relative load and maximum dynamic strength, and enable coaches and sports scientists to use the different velocity outputs to rapidly and accurately monitor their athletes on a daily basis.

摘要

洛图科、伊、苏乔梅尔、特、科巴尔、罗、阿鲁达、AFS、格雷罗、阿、佩雷拉、LA 和派、CN。三种不同俯姿划船练习的力量-速度关系。J 力量与调节研究 35(2):300-309,2021-本研究检验了力量-速度关系,并测试了在三种不同俯姿划船练习中确定 1 次最大重复次数(%1RM)相对负荷强度百分比的可能性。来自两个不同运动(国家橄榄球联盟球员和职业混合武术战士)的 30 名男性顶级运动员接受了自由俯姿卧拉、俯身杠铃划船和俯身史密斯机划船的最大动态力量评估,标准程序包括从 40%到 100%的 1RM 进行的举重。在所有尝试中测量平均速度、平均推进速度和峰值速度。进行线性回归分析以建立不同棒速测量值与%1RM 的关系。使用配对 t 检验比较每个练习的实际(在评估期间获得)和预测 1RM 值(基于预测方程)。在所有练习中,基于所有速度变量的预测 1RM 得分(基于预测方程)与各自的实际值没有差异。棒速与不同%1RM(在所有实验条件下,决定系数≥80%)之间的紧密线性关系允许对相对负荷和最大动态强度进行精确确定,并使教练和运动科学家能够使用不同的速度输出来快速准确地每天监测他们的运动员。

相似文献

1
Force-Velocity Relationship in Three Different Variations of Prone Row Exercises.三种不同俯式划船练习的力-速度关系。
J Strength Cond Res. 2021 Feb 1;35(2):300-309. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002543.
2
Predicting the Maximum Dynamic Strength in Bench Press: The High Precision of the Bar Velocity Approach.预测卧推中的最大动态力量:杠铃速度法的高精度
J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Apr;31(4):1127-1131. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001670.
3
Determining the One Repetition Maximum in the Ballistic Bench Press Exercise.确定弹式卧推练习中的 1 次最大重复次数。
J Strength Cond Res. 2020 Dec;34(12):3321-3325. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003845.
4
Load-velocity relationship 1RM predictions: A comparison of Smith machine and free-weight exercise.1RM 负荷-速度关系预测:史密斯机与自由重量练习的比较。
J Sports Sci. 2020 Nov;38(22):2562-2568. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2020.1794235. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
5
Validity of Different Velocity-Based Methods and Repetitions-to-Failure Equations for Predicting the 1 Repetition Maximum During 2 Upper-Body Pulling Exercises.不同基于速度的方法和预测 2 项上半身拉引练习 1 次最大重复次数的失效方程的有效性。
J Strength Cond Res. 2021 Jul 1;35(7):1800-1808. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003076.
6
Half-Squat and Jump Squat Exercises Performed Across a Range of Loads: Differences in Mechanical Outputs and Strength Deficits.在一系列负荷下进行的半蹲和跳蹲练习:机械输出和力量不足的差异。
J Strength Cond Res. 2023 May 1;37(5):1052-1056. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004382. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
7
Load-Velocity Relationship in National Paralympic Powerlifters: A Case Study.国家残奥会力量举重运动员的负荷-速度关系:案例研究。
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2019 Apr 1;14(4):531-535. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2018-0452. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
8
Comparison of load-velocity relationships in two bench press variations: weight stack machine vs Smith machine.两种卧推器械(重量训练机和史密斯机)的负荷-速度关系比较。
Sports Biomech. 2022 Nov;21(10):1147-1159. doi: 10.1080/14763141.2020.1735499. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
9
Velocity-Based Method in Free-Weight and Machine-Based Training Modalities: The Degree of Freedom Matters.基于速度的自由重量和器械训练模式:自由度很重要。
J Strength Cond Res. 2023 Sep 1;37(9):e500-e509. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004480. Epub 2023 Apr 3.
10
Using the Load-Velocity Profile for Predicting the 1RM of the Hexagonal Barbell Deadlift Exercise.利用负荷-速度曲线预测六角杠铃硬拉练习的1次重复最大重量
J Strength Cond Res. 2023 Jan 1;37(1):220-223. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004216. Epub 2022 Jan 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Can the velocity profile in the bench press and the bench pull sufficiently estimate the one repetition maximum in youth elite cross-country ski and biathlon athletes?卧推和卧拉中的速度曲线能否充分估计青年优秀越野滑雪和冬季两项运动员的一次重复最大值?
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2025 Apr 28;17(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s13102-025-01137-y.
2
Random measurement and prediction errors limit the practical relevance of two velocity sensors to estimate the 1RM back squat.随机测量误差和预测误差限制了两种速度传感器在估计1RM深蹲时的实际应用价值。
Front Physiol. 2024 Sep 10;15:1435103. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1435103. eCollection 2024.
3
Optimizing resistance training intensity in supportive care for survivors of breast cancer: velocity-based approach in the row exercise.
优化乳腺癌幸存者支持性护理中的抗阻训练强度:基于速度的划船运动方案。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Aug 29;32(9):617. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08824-5.
4
Sex Differences in the Load-Velocity Profiles of Three Different Row Exercises.三种不同划船练习的负荷-速度曲线中的性别差异
Sports (Basel). 2023 Nov 9;11(11):220. doi: 10.3390/sports11110220.
5
Lifting velocity predicts the maximum number of repetitions to failure with comparable accuracy during the Smith machine and free-weight prone bench pull exercises.在史密斯机和自由重量俯姿卧推练习中,提拉速度能以相当的准确性预测至力竭时的最大重复次数。
Heliyon. 2023 Aug 30;9(9):e19628. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19628. eCollection 2023 Sep.
6
Validity and reliability of upper body push and pull tests to determine one-repetition maximum.上半身推和拉测试确定最大重复次数的有效性和可靠性。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 13;18(7):e0288649. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288649. eCollection 2023.
7
Adaptive changes in bodybuilders in conditions of different energy supply modes and intensity of training load regimes using machine and free weight exercises.不同能量供应模式和训练负荷方案下,采用器械和自由重量练习时,健美运动员的适应性变化。
PeerJ. 2023 Feb 17;11:e14878. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14878. eCollection 2023.
8
Analysis of velocity- and power-load relationships of the free-weight back-squat and hexagonal bar deadlift exercises.自由重量深蹲和六角杠铃硬拉练习的速度与力量负荷关系分析。
Biol Sport. 2023 Jan;40(1):201-208. doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2023.112966. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
9
Acute Effects of Post‑Activation Performance Enhancement of 5RM Weighted Pull‑Ups and One Arm Pull‑Ups on Specific Upper Body Climbing Performance.5RM负重引体向上和单臂引体向上激活后增强效应对特定上身攀爬表现的急性影响
J Hum Kinet. 2022 Nov 8;84:206-215. doi: 10.2478/hukin-2022-0097. eCollection 2022 Oct.
10
Load-velocity relationships and predicted maximal strength: A systematic review of the validity and reliability of current methods.负荷-速度关系与预测最大力量:当前方法有效性和可靠性的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 27;17(10):e0267937. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267937. eCollection 2022.