Northwest Clinical Research Center, Bellevue, Washington, United States of America.
Department of Psychiatry, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 28;13(2):e0193043. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193043. eCollection 2018.
Recent studies show that placebo response has grown significantly over time in clinical trials for antidepressants, ADHD medications, antiepileptics, and antidiabetics. Contrary to expectations, trial outcome measures and success rates have not been impacted. This study aimed to see if this trend of increasing placebo response and stable efficacy outcome measures is unique to the conditions previously studied or if it occurs in trials for conditions with physiologically-measured symptoms, such as hypertension.
For this reason, we evaluated the efficacy data reported in the US Food and Drug Administration Medical and Statistical reviews for 23 antihypertensive programs (32,022 patients, 63 trials, 142 treatment arms). Placebo and medication response, effect sizes, and drug-placebo differences were calculated for each treatment arm and examined over time using meta-regression. We also explored the relationship of sample size, trial duration, baseline blood pressure, and number of treatment arms to placebo/drug response and efficacy outcome measures.
Like trials of other conditions, placebo response has risen significantly over time (R2 = 0.093, p = 0.018) and effect size (R2 = 0.013, p = 0.187) drug-placebo difference (R2 = 0.013, p = 0.182) and success rate (134/142, 94.4%) have remained unaffected, likely due to a significant compensatory increase in antihypertensive response (R2 = 0.086, p<0.001). Treatment arms are likely overpowered with sample sizes increasing over time (R2 = 0.387, p<0.0001) and stable, large effect sizes (0.78 ±0.37). The exploratory analysis of sample size, trial duration, baseline blood pressure, and number of treatment arms yielded mixed results unlikely to explain the pattern of placebo response and efficacy outcomes over time. The magnitude of placebo response had no relationship to effect size (p = 0.877), antihypertensive-placebo differences (p = 0.752), or p-values (p = 0.963) but was correlated with antihypertensive response (R2 = 0.347, p<0.0001).
As hypothesized, this study shows that placebo response is increasing in clinical trials for hypertension without any evidence of this increase impacting trial outcomes. Attempting to control placebo response in clinical trials for hypertension may not be necessary for successful efficacy outcomes. In exploratory analysis, we noted that despite finding significant relationships, none of the trial or patient characteristics we examined offered a clear explanation of the rise in placebo and stability in outcome measures over time. Collectively, these data suggest that the phenomenon of increasing placebo response and stable efficacy outcomes may be a general trend, occurring across trials for various psychiatric and medical conditions with physiological and non-physiological endpoints.
最近的研究表明,在抗抑郁药、ADHD 药物、抗癫痫药和抗糖尿病药的临床试验中,安慰剂反应显著增长。与预期相反,试验结果测量和成功率并未受到影响。本研究旨在观察这种安慰剂反应增加和疗效结果测量稳定的趋势是否仅适用于之前研究过的病症,或者是否也发生在具有生理测量症状的病症的试验中,如高血压。
为此,我们评估了美国食品和药物管理局医学和统计审查报告中 23 项降压计划(32022 名患者,63 项试验,142 个治疗臂)的疗效数据。为每个治疗臂计算了安慰剂和药物反应、效应大小以及药物-安慰剂差异,并使用荟萃回归随时间进行了检查。我们还探讨了样本量、试验持续时间、基线血压和治疗臂数量与安慰剂/药物反应和疗效结果测量之间的关系。
与其他病症的试验一样,安慰剂反应随着时间的推移显著增加(R2=0.093,p=0.018),效应大小(R2=0.013,p=0.187)药物-安慰剂差异(R2=0.013,p=0.182)和成功率(134/142,94.4%)保持不变,这可能是由于降压反应的显著补偿性增加(R2=0.086,p<0.001)。随着时间的推移,治疗臂的样本量增加(R2=0.387,p<0.0001),效应大小稳定且较大(0.78±0.37),因此治疗臂的效能可能过高。对样本量、试验持续时间、基线血压和治疗臂数量的探索性分析得出的结果喜忧参半,不太可能解释安慰剂反应和疗效结果随时间变化的模式。安慰剂反应的幅度与效应大小(p=0.877)、降压-安慰剂差异(p=0.752)或 p 值(p=0.963)无关,但与降压反应相关(R2=0.347,p<0.0001)。
正如假设的那样,本研究表明,高血压临床试验中的安慰剂反应正在增加,而没有证据表明这种增加会影响试验结果。在高血压临床试验中试图控制安慰剂反应可能不是获得成功疗效结果所必需的。在探索性分析中,我们注意到,尽管发现了显著的关系,但我们研究的试验或患者特征均没有提供安慰剂和结果测量随时间稳定增加的明确解释。总的来说,这些数据表明,安慰剂反应增加和疗效结果稳定的现象可能是一种普遍趋势,发生在具有生理和非生理终点的各种精神和医学病症的试验中。