• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肛门直肠重建术后常规扩张的作用——两个三级中心的比较

Role of Routine Dilatations after Anorectal Reconstruction-Comparison of Two Tertiary Centers.

作者信息

Mullassery Dhanya, Chhabra Sumita, Babu Ashik Muhamed, Iacona Roberta, Blackburn Simon, Cross Kate M, De Coppi Paolo, Baillie Colin Tennant, Kenny Simon, Curry Joe I

机构信息

Department of Paediatric Surgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

Department of Paediatric Surgery, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2019 Jun;29(3):243-246. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1632392. Epub 2018 Feb 28.

DOI:10.1055/s-0038-1632392
PMID:29490378
Abstract

AIM

Regular anal dilatations are commonly recommended in the postoperative management following posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) in anorectal malformations (ARM). We hypothesized that routine postoperative dilatations may not affect surgical outcomes following PSARP. We compare surgical outcomes of routine postoperative dilatations versus no routine postoperative dilatations from two United Kingdom tertiary pediatric surgical centers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is retrospective records review of patients undergoing definitive surgery for ARM in two tertiary surgical centers in the UK over 5 years. Center A used a protocol of routine postoperative dilatations, and center B used a protocol, which used dilatations only for clinical indications of stricture. Data collected included ARM type, operative procedures, and postoperative interventions. All post-operative interventions under general anesthesia (GA) were compared between groups.

RESULTS

From 2011 to 2015, 49 procedures (46 PSARPs) were performed in center A and 54 (52 PSARPs) in center B. Median follow up period was 31 months (interquartile range [IQR] 18-48). The first postoperative anal calibration under GA was documented for 43 (86%) patients in center A and for 42 (78%) patients in center B. Following this, center A followed routine postoperative dilatation (RPD) at home, and center B reserved further dilatations for specific indications. RPD was performed for 100% of patients in center A versus 8% in center B. Further anal dilatations under GA were performed in 19 (38%) children in center A and in 17 (34%) children in center B ( = 0.68). In center A, 10 patients (22%) needed further surgery versus 14 (28%) in center B ( = 0.48).

CONCLUSION

The use of routine postoperative dilatations does not significantly improve surgical outcomes following PSARP in ARM.

摘要

目的

在肛门直肠畸形(ARM)的后矢状入路肛门直肠成形术(PSARP)后的术后管理中,通常推荐定期进行肛门扩张。我们推测,PSARP术后常规扩张可能不会影响手术效果。我们比较了英国两个三级儿科手术中心常规术后扩张与非常规术后扩张的手术效果。

材料与方法

这是一项对英国两个三级手术中心5年内接受ARM确定性手术的患者进行的回顾性记录审查。中心A采用常规术后扩张方案,中心B采用仅在出现狭窄临床指征时进行扩张的方案。收集的数据包括ARM类型、手术操作和术后干预措施。比较了两组在全身麻醉(GA)下的所有术后干预措施。

结果

2011年至2015年,中心A进行了49例手术(46例PSARP),中心B进行了54例(52例PSARP)。中位随访期为31个月(四分位间距[IQR]18 - 48)。中心A有43例(86%)患者记录了首次GA下的术后肛门扩肛,中心B有42例(78%)患者记录了该操作。在此之后,中心A在患者家中进行常规术后扩张(RPD),中心B仅在特定指征下进行进一步扩张。中心A 100%的患者进行了RPD,而中心B为8%。中心A有19例(38%)儿童接受了进一步的GA下肛门扩张,中心B有17例(34%)儿童接受了该操作(P = 0.68)。中心A有10例(22%)患者需要进一步手术,中心B有14例(28%)患者需要进一步手术(P = 0.48)。

结论

在ARM的PSARP术后,使用常规术后扩张并不能显著改善手术效果。

相似文献

1
Role of Routine Dilatations after Anorectal Reconstruction-Comparison of Two Tertiary Centers.肛门直肠重建术后常规扩张的作用——两个三级中心的比较
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2019 Jun;29(3):243-246. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1632392. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
2
Are routine dilatations necessary post pull-through surgery for Hirschsprung disease?先天性巨结肠症拖出术后常规扩张有必要吗?
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2013 Oct;23(5):383-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1333635. Epub 2013 Feb 26.
3
Preventing posterior sagittal anoplasty 'cripples' in areas with limited medical resources: a few modifications to surgical approach in anorectal malformations.在医疗资源有限的地区预防后矢状入路肛门成形术的“致残”:对肛门直肠畸形手术方法的一些改进
Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2012 Sep-Dec;9(3):223-6. doi: 10.4103/0189-6725.104724.
4
The effectiveness of digital anal dilatation in preventing anal strictures after anorectal malformation repair.数字肛门扩张在预防肛门直肠畸形修复后肛门狭窄中的有效性。
J Pediatr Surg. 2019 Oct;54(10):2178-2181. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2019.04.004. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
5
A comparison of laparoscopic-assisted (LAARP) and posterior sagittal (PSARP) anorectoplasty in the outcome of intermediate and high anorectal malformations.腹腔镜辅助(LAARP)与后矢状(PSARP)肛门直肠成形术治疗中高位肛门直肠畸形疗效的比较
S Afr J Surg. 2011 Mar 14;49(1):39-43.
6
Challenges, constraints and failures that are related to the posterior sagittal anorectoplasty approach to anorectal malformations in a low-resource context: An experience from a sudanese tertiary referral centre.在资源匮乏的环境下,后矢状入路肛门直肠畸形修复术所面临的挑战、限制和失败:苏丹一家三级转诊中心的经验。
Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2020 Jul-Dec;17(3 & 4):79-84. doi: 10.4103/ajps.AJPS_16_20.
7
Anterior or posterior sagittal anorectoplasty without colostomy for low-type anorectal malformation: how to get a better outcome?经肛门矢状入路直肠肛门成形术治疗低位型肛门直肠畸形:如何获得更好的疗效?
J Pediatr Surg. 2010 Jul;45(7):1505-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.02.042.
8
Laparoscopically Assisted Anorectal Pull-Through versus Posterior Sagittal Anorectoplasty for High and Intermediate Anorectal Malformations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.腹腔镜辅助肛门直肠拖出术与后矢状位肛门直肠成形术治疗中高位肛门直肠畸形的系统评价和Meta分析
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 18;12(1):e0170421. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170421. eCollection 2017.
9
Is routine dilatation after repair of esophageal atresia with distal fistula better than dilatation when symptoms arise? Comparison of results of two European pediatric surgical centers.
J Pediatr Surg. 2004 Nov;39(11):1643-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2004.07.011.
10
Wound Dehiscence after Posterior Sagittal Anorectoplasty in Children with Anorectal Malformations.肛门直肠畸形患儿后路矢状入路肛门成形术后伤口裂开。
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Nov 11;2018:2930783. doi: 10.1155/2018/2930783. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Parental attitudes to neoanus dilatations post-reconstruction in anorectal malformations (PANDA) study.肛门直肠畸形重建术后家长对新生儿扩肛的态度(PANDA)研究
Pediatr Surg Int. 2025 Sep 17;41(1):296. doi: 10.1007/s00383-025-06190-9.
2
More harm than good? Parental perspectives on dilatations in anorectal malformations.弊大于利?父母对肛门直肠畸形扩张术的看法。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2025 Jun 19;41(1):179. doi: 10.1007/s00383-025-06070-2.
3
The use of postoperative calibrations in Hirschsprung disease: a practice to reconsider?
先天性巨结肠术后校准的应用:是否需要重新考虑?
Pediatr Surg Int. 2024 Jul 5;40(1):176. doi: 10.1007/s00383-024-05761-6.
4
The European Anorectal Malformation Network (ARM-Net) patient registry: 10-year review of clinical and surgical characteristics.欧洲肛肠畸形网络(ARM-Net)患者登记处:临床和手术特征的10年回顾
Br J Surg. 2024 Jan 31;111(2). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znae019.
5
A scoping review of the post-discharge care needs of babies requiring surgery in the first year of life.对出生后第一年需要手术的婴儿出院后护理需求的范围综述。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Nov 22;3(11):e0002424. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002424. eCollection 2023.
6
Stricture rate in patients after the repair of anorectal malformation following a standardized dilation protocol.患者接受标准化扩张方案治疗肛门直肠畸形修复术后的狭窄发生率。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2022 Dec;38(12):1717-1721. doi: 10.1007/s00383-022-05219-7. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
7
General complications after surgery for anorectal malformations.肛门直肠畸形手术后的一般并发症。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2020 Apr;36(4):431-445. doi: 10.1007/s00383-020-04629-9. Epub 2020 Feb 21.