Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 415 N Washington St, Baltimore, MD, 21231, USA.
University of Washington, 2301 Fifth Ave, Suite 600, Seattle, WA, 98121, USA.
Global Health. 2018 Mar 1;14(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12992-018-0343-z.
Global Health is an inherently interdisciplinary field but overseas training in global health, particularly among health science institutions, has been an 'individual' or 'individual discipline' experience. Team-based training is an approach to global health education which is increasing in popularity; research on team-training demonstrates that teams are more productive than individuals. In 2015, the Johns Hopkins Center for Global Health (CGH) developed the Global Established Multidisciplinary Sites (GEMS) program, an interdisciplinary training program which was designed to establish a new norm in global health training by bringing interdisciplinary teams of faculty and students together to identify and solve complex global health challenges. This research aims to evaluate the program's first year and contribute to the literature on interdisciplinary team training. We conducted 22 in-depth interviews with students, faculty, and local collaborators from 3 GEMS project sites. Findings were analyzed for themes through a framework approach.
The program exposed students, faculty, and collaborators to a wide range of disciplines in global health. Students' desire to learn how other disciplines contribute to global health solutions was an important motivator for joining GEMS; many participants including faculty and collaborators valued exposure to multiple disciplines. Mentorship and communication were a challenge across all teams in part due to members having distinct "disciplinary languages". Balancing disciplinary representation on teams and establishing work plans were also key challenges.
Based on the data the CGH provides four recommendations for institutions developing global health interdisciplinary teams to optimize team functioning and address challenges in mentorship, language, and roles: 1) address interdisciplinary communication early, 2) develop work plans during group formation, 3) meet as a team prior to travel, and 4) establish regular check ins. This article provides first-hand reflections on interdisciplinary team experiences in a global context and provides a pathway for the development of innovative strategies in global health training.
全球健康是一个固有的跨学科领域,但海外的全球健康培训,特别是在卫生科学机构中,一直是一种“个人”或“个人学科”的体验。基于团队的培训是一种越来越流行的全球健康教育方法;团队培训的研究表明,团队比个人更有成效。2015 年,约翰霍普金斯全球健康中心(CGH)开发了全球既定多学科站点(GEMS)项目,这是一个跨学科培训项目,旨在通过将跨学科的教师和学生团队聚集在一起,确定和解决复杂的全球健康挑战,建立全球健康培训的新规范。本研究旨在评估该项目的第一年,并为跨学科团队培训的文献做出贡献。我们对来自 3 个 GEMS 项目地点的学生、教师和当地合作者进行了 22 次深入访谈。通过框架方法对发现进行了主题分析。
该项目使学生、教师和合作者接触到全球健康领域的广泛学科。学生渴望了解其他学科如何为全球健康解决方案做出贡献,这是加入 GEMS 的一个重要动机;许多参与者,包括教师和合作者,都重视接触多个学科。指导和沟通是所有团队的一个挑战,部分原因是成员有不同的“学科语言”。在团队中平衡学科代表性和制定工作计划也是关键挑战。
基于 CGH 提供的数据,为开发全球健康跨学科团队的机构提供了四条建议,以优化团队功能并解决指导、语言和角色方面的挑战:1)尽早解决跨学科沟通问题,2)在团队组建期间制定工作计划,3)在旅行前作为一个团队会面,4)建立定期检查。本文提供了在全球背景下跨学科团队经验的第一手反思,并为全球健康培训中的创新策略的发展提供了途径。