School of Health Professions Education, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Department of Educational Development and Research, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Perspect Med Educ. 2021 Jan;10(1):33-40. doi: 10.1007/s40037-020-00644-7. Epub 2020 Dec 22.
Health professions education faces transitions from monodisciplinary to integrated education and from soloist teachers to interdisciplinary teacher teams. Interdisciplinary teamwork has been found complex and prone to conflict. Teachers' perceptions of why some teams work and learn as a real interdisciplinary team and others do not are lacking in this setting. We studied the factors that teachers perceive as enabling and/or inhibiting interdisciplinary team learning.
In this exploratory, qualitative study, we conducted 17 semi-structured, vignette-guided interviews with teachers recruited from diverse disciplines in undergraduate health professions programmes at Maastricht University, the Netherlands, through maximum variation sampling. Team learning research informed data collection and template analysis.
We identified three themes representing the factors that teachers perceived to influence interdisciplinary team learning: 'alignment/misalignment with the educational philosophy' (regarding personal attributes, tendencies and motivation), 'leadership practices' (encompassing team vision, responsibility and reflection), and 'involvement in organisational processes' (covering organisational decision-making, support and learning opportunities). For interdisciplinary team learning in development of integrated education, teachers emphasised their personal ability to move beyond disciplinary boundaries. Shared team leadership enabled the creation of a shared vision, shared responsibility, and team reflection. Lastly, teacher involvement in educational management, peer support and learning was considered important.
To work beyond disciplines in health professions education, teachers should take an interest in integrated education, share responsibility and work in an environment where people continuously learn from others. Organisations can facilitate this by involving teachers in decision-making processes and providing faculty development aimed to foster shared leadership and team reflection.
健康专业教育正面临从单一学科向综合教育、从独奏教师向跨学科教师团队的转变。跨学科团队合作被认为是复杂的,并且容易产生冲突。在这种背景下,人们对教师对一些团队如何作为真正的跨学科团队运作和学习,而另一些团队则不能运作和学习的原因的看法还很缺乏。我们研究了教师认为能够促进和/或阻碍跨学科团队学习的因素。
在这项探索性的定性研究中,我们通过最大变异抽样,从荷兰马斯特里赫特大学本科健康专业课程中不同学科招募了 17 名教师,对他们进行了 17 次半结构化的、基于案例的访谈。团队学习研究为数据收集和模板分析提供了信息。
我们确定了三个主题,代表了教师认为影响跨学科团队学习的因素:“与教育理念的一致/不一致”(关于个人属性、倾向和动机)、“领导实践”(包括团队愿景、责任和反思)以及“参与组织过程”(涵盖组织决策、支持和学习机会)。对于综合教育发展中的跨学科团队学习,教师强调他们个人超越学科界限的能力。共同的团队领导使共同愿景、共同责任和团队反思成为可能。最后,教师参与教育管理、同伴支持和学习被认为是很重要的。
要在健康专业教育中超越学科,教师应该对综合教育感兴趣,分担责任,并在一个人们不断向他人学习的环境中工作。组织可以通过让教师参与决策过程和提供旨在培养共同领导和团队反思的教师发展来促进这一点。