Tuncer Ahmet Ali, Erten Elif Emel Ayar
Dr. Ahmet Ali Tuncer, Assistant Professor, Department of Pediatric Surgery, a.Medical Faculty, Afyon Kocatepe University, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey.
Dr. Elif Emel Ayar Erten, MD, Clinic of Pediatric Surgery, Hakkari State Hospital, Hakkari, Turkey.
Pak J Med Sci. 2017 Nov-Dec;33(6):1418-1423. doi: 10.12669/pjms.336.13640.
In this study, thermocautery, plastic clamping, and conventional (open surgical) circumcision techniques were compared in terms of their complications.
Male patients who underwent circumcisions between May 2014 and May 2015 in two separate pediatric surgery clinics were retrospectively analyzed using the hospital registry system. These patients were evaluated in terms of age, accompanying pathologies, anesthesia techniques, complication rates, duration of surgery, and circumcision techniques. A statistical analysis of the data was performed, with a P<0.05 considered to be statistically significant.
The patients were divided into three groups according to the circumcision method: conventional surgical circumcision (n=833), thermocautery (n=1011), and plastic clamp (n=218). Complications were observed in 21 cases (1%): bleeding (11), infection (2), trapped penis (6), meatitis (1), and scrotal injury (1). There were significantly fewer complications in the thermocautery technique when compared to the clamping and surgical circumcision techniques. The plastic clamping and thermocautery techniques were superior to a surgical circumcision in terms of the operation time.
The thermocautery circumcision technique can be used easily in both the operating theatre and in designated circumcision rooms, with a lower complication rate, when compared to plastic clamping and surgical circumcisions.
在本研究中,对热灼术、塑料夹闭术和传统(开放式手术)包皮环切术的并发症进行了比较。
使用医院登记系统对2014年5月至2015年5月期间在两家不同的儿科手术诊所接受包皮环切术的男性患者进行回顾性分析。根据年龄、伴随的病理情况、麻醉技术、并发症发生率、手术持续时间和包皮环切术技术对这些患者进行评估。对数据进行了统计分析,P<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
根据包皮环切术方法将患者分为三组:传统手术包皮环切术(n=833)、热灼术(n=1011)和塑料夹闭术(n=218)。观察到21例(1%)并发症:出血(11例)、感染(2例)、阴茎绞窄(6例)、尿道口炎(1例)和阴囊损伤(1例)。与夹闭术和手术包皮环切术相比,热灼术技术的并发症明显更少。在手术时间方面,塑料夹闭术和热灼术技术优于手术包皮环切术。
与塑料夹闭术和手术包皮环切术相比,热灼术包皮环切术技术并发症发生率较低,在手术室和指定的包皮环切术房间均可轻松使用。