Klein Samuel Patrick, Bruyninckx Dominike, Callebaut Ina, Depreitere Bart
Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2018;126:287-290. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-65798-1_56.
We investigated the effect of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage on the intracranial pressure (ICP) signal measured in the parenchyma and the ventricle as well as the effect on the pressure reactivity index (PRx) calculated from both signals.
Ten patients were included in this prospective study. All patients received a parenchymal ICP sensor and an external ventricular drain (EVD) for CSF drainage. ICP signals (ICP-p and ICP-evd) were captured. Part of the study was a period of 90 min during which the patient was free from any manipulation, consisting of 30 min of drainage (O1), 30 min EVD closed (C) and 30 min of drainage (O2).
Mean ICP-evd and mean AMP-evd increased (3.03 and 0.46 mmHg) from O1 to C and decreased (2.12 and 0.43 mmHg) from C to O2. ICP-p and AMP-p changes were less pronounced (closing EVD: +0.81 mmHg/+0.22 mmHg; opening EVD: -0.22 mmHg/-0.05 mmHg). Mean difference between PRx-evd and PRx-p was 0.12 for O1, 0.02 for C and -0.02 for O2. The intraclass correlation coefficient for absolute agreement of single measures was 0.66 for O1, 0.77 for C and 0.69 for O2. Mean PRx differences demonstrated a significant difference between O1 versus C and O1 versus O2 but not between C versus O2.
Drainage of CSF reduces ICP magnitude and amplitude through the EVD. This effect was only marginal in parenchymal ICP measurements. In manipulation-free circumstances, agreement of PRx obtained through parenchymal and ventricular measurements was moderate to good, depending on the statistical method, and was not necessarily influenced by drainage.
我们研究了脑脊液(CSF)引流对在脑实质和脑室中测量的颅内压(ICP)信号的影响,以及对从这两种信号计算得出的压力反应性指数(PRx)的影响。
本前瞻性研究纳入了10名患者。所有患者均接受了用于测量脑实质ICP的传感器和用于CSF引流的外部脑室引流管(EVD)。采集ICP信号(ICP-p和ICP-evd)。研究的一部分是90分钟的时间段,在此期间患者未接受任何操作,包括30分钟的引流(O1)、30分钟EVD关闭(C)和30分钟的引流(O2)。
从O1到C,平均ICP-evd和平均AMP-evd升高(分别为3.03和0.46 mmHg),从C到O2降低(分别为2.12和0.43 mmHg)。ICP-p和AMP-p的变化不太明显(关闭EVD:+0.81 mmHg / +0.22 mmHg;打开EVD:-0.22 mmHg / -0.05 mmHg)。O1时PRx-evd与PRx-p之间的平均差异为0.12,C时为0.02,O2时为-0.02。单次测量绝对一致性的组内相关系数在O1时为0.66,C时为0.77,O2时为0.69。平均PRx差异显示O1与C之间以及O1与O2之间存在显著差异,但C与O2之间无显著差异。
CSF引流通过EVD降低了ICP的大小和幅度。这种效应在脑实质ICP测量中仅为边缘效应。在无操作的情况下,根据统计方法,通过脑实质和脑室测量获得的PRx一致性为中等至良好,且不一定受引流影响。