Queiro Rubén, Coto Pablo, Joven Beatriz, Rivera Raquel, Navío Marco Teresa, de la Cueva Pablo, Alvarez Vega Jose Luis, Narváez Moreno Basilio, Rodriguez Martínez Fernando José, Pardo Sánchez José, Feced Olmos Carlos, Pujol Conrad, Rodríguez Jesús, Notario Jaume, Pujol Busquets Manel, García Font Mercè, Galindez Eva, Pérez Barrio Silvia, Urruticoechea-Arana Ana, Hergueta Merce, López Montilla M Dolores, Vélez García-Nieto Antonio, Maceiras Francisco, Rodríguez Pazos Laura, Rubio Romero Esteban, Rodríguez Fernandez Freire Lourdes, Luelmo Jesús, Gratacós Jordi
Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, ISPA, Oviedo, España.
Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, ISPA, Oviedo, España.
Reumatol Clin (Engl Ed). 2020 Jan-Feb;16(1):24-31. doi: 10.1016/j.reuma.2018.01.010. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
A survey was sent to clinicians who already performed multidisciplinary care or were in the process of undertaking it, asking: 1) Type of multidisciplinary care model implemented; 2) Degree, priority and feasibility of the implementation of quality standards in the structure, process and result for care. In 6 regional meetings the results of the survey were presented and discussed, and the ultimate priority of quality standards for care was defined. At a nominal meeting group, 11 experts (rheumatologists and dermatologists) analyzed the results of the survey and the regional meetings. With this information, they defined which standards of care are currently considered as minimum and which are excellent.
The simultaneous and parallel models of multidisciplinary care are those most widely implemented, but the implementation of quality standards is highly variable. In terms of structure it ranges from 22% to 74%, in those related to process from 17% to 54% and in the results from 2% to 28%. Of the 25 original quality standards for care, 9 were considered only minimum, 4 were excellent and 12 defined criteria for minimum level and others for excellence.
The definition of minimum and excellent quality standards for care will help achieve the goal of multidisciplinary care for patients with PAs, which is the best healthcare possible.
1)分析银屑病关节炎(PsA)患者多学科护理模式的实施情况;2)确定护理的最低标准和卓越标准。
向已经实施多学科护理或正在实施多学科护理的临床医生发送了一份调查问卷,询问:1)实施的多学科护理模式类型;2)护理在结构、过程和结果方面实施质量标准的程度、优先级和可行性。在6次区域会议上展示并讨论了调查结果,并确定了护理质量标准的最终优先级。在一次名义会议小组中,11名专家(风湿病学家和皮肤科医生)分析了调查结果和区域会议情况。利用这些信息,他们确定了目前哪些护理标准被视为最低标准,哪些是卓越标准。
多学科护理的同步和并行模式是实施最广泛的模式,但质量标准的实施差异很大。在结构方面,实施率从22%到74%不等,在过程相关方面从17%到54%不等,在结果方面从2%到28%不等。在最初的25项护理质量标准中,9项仅被视为最低标准,4项是卓越标准,12项定义了最低水平标准和其他卓越标准。
护理最低质量标准和卓越质量标准的定义将有助于实现PsA患者多学科护理的目标,即尽可能提供最佳医疗服务。