Suppr超能文献

银屑病关节炎筛查:一项系统文献综述及专家建议

Psoriatic arthritis screening: A systematic literature review and experts' recommendations.

作者信息

Urruticoechea-Arana Ana, Benavent Diego, León Fernando, Almodovar Raquel, Belinchón Isabel, de la Cueva Pablo, Fernández-Carballido Cristina, Loza Estíbaliz, Gratacós Jordi

机构信息

Rheumatology Department, Hospital Can Misses, Ibiza, Spain.

Rheumatology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Mar 15;16(3):e0248571. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248571. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the performance of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) screening tools, examine their implementation in daily practice, and reach a consensus about the best screening tool for implementation in daily practice in different medical settings.

METHODS

A systematic literature review (SLR), structured telephone interviews to hospitals, and a multidisciplinary nominal group meeting were all conducted. The SLR employed sensitive search strategies using Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to January 2020. Two reviewers independently selected articles that reported data on PsA screening tools and that included sufficient data to at least calculate the sensitivity and specificity of those tools (e.g., questionnaires, algorithms, specific questions, and biomarkers). The hospital interviews collected data regarding the process of suspected PsA diagnosis and referral to rheumatology, the implementation of PsA screening tools, and barriers and facilitators to implementation of those tools. In the nominal group meeting, a multidisciplinary team of experts discussed all these data and subsequently recommended a screening tool for implementation.

RESULTS

The SLR included 41 moderate-quality studies that analyzed 14 PsA screening tools, most of which were questionnaire-based tools. All of these studies reported a moderate-good performance but presented different characteristics regarding the time to completion or the number and type of items or questions. The implementation of screening tools was low (30.5%). The experts ultimately recommended regular use of a PsA screening tool, preferably the PURE-4 questionnaire.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of PsA screening tools like the PURE-4 questionnaire in daily practice likely improves the prognosis of PsA patients.

摘要

目的

分析银屑病关节炎(PsA)筛查工具的性能,研究其在日常实践中的应用情况,并就不同医疗环境下日常实践中最佳筛查工具达成共识。

方法

进行了系统文献综述(SLR)、对医院的结构化电话访谈以及多学科名义群体会议。SLR采用敏感的检索策略,利用Medline、Embase和Cochrane图书馆截至2020年1月的数据。两名评审员独立筛选报告了PsA筛查工具数据且包含足够数据以至少计算这些工具敏感性和特异性的文章(如问卷、算法、特定问题和生物标志物)。医院访谈收集了关于疑似PsA诊断和转诊至风湿病科的过程、PsA筛查工具的应用情况以及这些工具应用的障碍和促进因素的数据。在名义群体会议上,多学科专家团队讨论了所有这些数据,随后推荐了一种用于应用的筛查工具。

结果

SLR纳入了41项中等质量研究,分析了14种PsA筛查工具,其中大多数是基于问卷的工具。所有这些研究均报告了中等良好的性能,但在完成时间、项目或问题数量及类型方面呈现出不同特征。筛查工具的应用率较低(30.5%)。专家最终建议定期使用PsA筛查工具,最好是PURE - 4问卷。

结论

在日常实践中应用如PURE - 4问卷这样的PsA筛查工具可能会改善PsA患者的预后。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67d6/7959352/c4d82e0c7960/pone.0248571.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验