Suppr超能文献

失语症患者命名与故事梗概生成之间的关系。

The Relationship Between Confrontation Naming and Story Gist Production in Aphasia.

机构信息

University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.

Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.

出版信息

Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018 Mar 1;27(1S):406-422. doi: 10.1044/2017_AJSLP-16-0211.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between picture naming performance and the ability to communicate the gist, or essential elements, of a story. We also sought to determine if this relationship varied according to Western Aphasia Battery-Revised (WAB-R; Kertesz, 2007) aphasia subtype.

METHOD

Demographic information, test scores, and transcripts of 258 individuals with aphasia completing 3 narrative tasks were retrieved from the AphasiaBank database. Narratives were subjected to a main concept analysis to determine gist production. A correlation analysis was used to investigate the relationship between naming scores and main concept production for the whole group of persons with aphasia and for WAB-R subtypes separately.

RESULTS

We found strong correlations between naming test scores and narrative gist production for the large sample of persons with aphasia. However, the strength of the correlations varied by WAB-R subtype.

CONCLUSIONS

Picture naming may accurately predict gist production for individuals with Broca's and Wernicke's aphasia, but not for other WAB-R subtypes. Given the current reprioritization of outcome measurement, picture naming may not be an appropriate surrogate measure for functional communication for all persons with aphasia.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS

https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.5851848.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨图片命名表现与传达故事要点或基本要素的能力之间的关系。我们还试图确定这种关系是否因西方失语症成套测验修订版(WAB-R;Kertesz,2007)失语症亚型而有所不同。

方法

从失语症银行数据库中检索了 258 名失语症患者的人口统计学信息、测试分数和 3 项叙事任务的转录本。对叙述进行了主要概念分析,以确定要点的产生。采用相关分析来调查整个失语症患者组以及 WAB-R 亚型组的命名得分与主要概念产生之间的关系。

结果

我们发现,在大量失语症患者中,命名测试得分与叙事要点产生之间存在很强的相关性。然而,相关性的强度因 WAB-R 亚型而异。

结论

图片命名可能可以准确预测 Broca 氏和 Wernicke 氏失语症患者的要点产生,但不能预测其他 WAB-R 亚型。鉴于当前对结果测量的重新优先排序,图片命名可能不是所有失语症患者功能交流的合适替代测量指标。

补充材料

https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.5851848.

相似文献

1
The Relationship Between Confrontation Naming and Story Gist Production in Aphasia.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018 Mar 1;27(1S):406-422. doi: 10.1044/2017_AJSLP-16-0211.
2
Action-naming performance in four syndromes of aphasia.
Brain Lang. 1987 Sep;32(1):124-36. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(87)90120-9.
3
Naming to picture versus description in three aphasic subgroups.
Cortex. 1979 Jun;15(2):199-211. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(79)80025-8.
4
Coherence violations and propositional usage in the narratives of fluent aphasics.
Brain Lang. 1995 Nov;51(2):291-317. doi: 10.1006/brln.1995.1062.
5
An investigation of naming errors following semantic and phonemic cueing.
Neuropsychologia. 1991;29(11):1083-93. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(91)90078-m.
7
The effects of grammatic class and cue type on cueing responsiveness in aphasia.
Brain Lang. 1990 Jan;38(1):48-60. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(90)90101-l.
8
The effect of stimulus color on naming performance of aphasic adults.
J Commun Disord. 1989 Dec;22(6):397-405. doi: 10.1016/0021-9924(89)90033-6.
9
Processing passive sentences in aphasia: deficits and strategies.
Brain Lang. 1987 Jan;30(1):93-105. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(87)90030-7.
10
The nature of the phonological disorder in conduction aphasia.
Brain Lang. 1984 Sep;23(1):97-115. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(84)90009-9.

引用本文的文献

1
The curious case of the Cat Rescue: can picture narrative description inform visuospatial processing in aphasia?
Front Hum Neurosci. 2025 May 22;19:1574453. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1574453. eCollection 2025.
3
Assessing Relative Linguistic Impairment With Model-Based Item Selection.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2024 Aug 5;67(8):2600-2619. doi: 10.1044/2024_JSLHR-23-00439. Epub 2024 Jul 12.
5
Evaluating circumlocution in naming as a predictor of communicative informativeness and efficiency in discourse.
Aphasiology. 2024;38(2):237-260. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2023.2183076. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
6
Automating Intended Target Identification for Paraphasias in Discourse Using a Large Language Model.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2023 Dec 11;66(12):4949-4966. doi: 10.1044/2023_JSLHR-23-00121. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
7
Core lexicon in aphasia: A longitudinal study.
Aphasiology. 2023;37(10):1679-1691. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2022.2121598. Epub 2022 Oct 2.
8
The Severity-Calibrated Aphasia Naming Test.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2022 Nov 16;31(6):2722-2740. doi: 10.1044/2022_AJSLP-22-00071. Epub 2022 Nov 4.
9
Assessment of language impairment and function.
Handb Clin Neurol. 2022;185:175-193. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-823384-9.00009-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment Fidelity in Aphasia Research.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2016 Dec 1;25(4S):S788-S797. doi: 10.1044/2016_AJSLP-15-0146.
2
Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 1;2016(6):CD000425. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000425.pub4.
3
AphasiaBank as BigData.
Semin Speech Lang. 2016 Feb;37(1):10-22. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1571357. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
5
Stability of Word-Retrieval Errors With the AphasiaBank Stimuli.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015 Nov;24(4):S953-60. doi: 10.1044/2015_AJSLP-14-0152.
8
Development and Simulation Testing of a Computerized Adaptive Version of the Philadelphia Naming Test.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2015 Jun 1;58(3):878-890. doi: 10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-14-0297.
9
Item Response Theory Modeling of the Philadelphia Naming Test.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2015 Jun 1;58(3):865-877. doi: 10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-14-0249.
10
Test-retest stability of word retrieval in aphasic discourse.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2014 Jun 1;57(3):966-78. doi: 10.1044/2014_JSLHR-L-13-0171.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验