• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

失语症患者命名与故事梗概生成之间的关系。

The Relationship Between Confrontation Naming and Story Gist Production in Aphasia.

机构信息

University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.

Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.

出版信息

Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018 Mar 1;27(1S):406-422. doi: 10.1044/2017_AJSLP-16-0211.

DOI:10.1044/2017_AJSLP-16-0211
PMID:29497752
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6111489/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between picture naming performance and the ability to communicate the gist, or essential elements, of a story. We also sought to determine if this relationship varied according to Western Aphasia Battery-Revised (WAB-R; Kertesz, 2007) aphasia subtype.

METHOD

Demographic information, test scores, and transcripts of 258 individuals with aphasia completing 3 narrative tasks were retrieved from the AphasiaBank database. Narratives were subjected to a main concept analysis to determine gist production. A correlation analysis was used to investigate the relationship between naming scores and main concept production for the whole group of persons with aphasia and for WAB-R subtypes separately.

RESULTS

We found strong correlations between naming test scores and narrative gist production for the large sample of persons with aphasia. However, the strength of the correlations varied by WAB-R subtype.

CONCLUSIONS

Picture naming may accurately predict gist production for individuals with Broca's and Wernicke's aphasia, but not for other WAB-R subtypes. Given the current reprioritization of outcome measurement, picture naming may not be an appropriate surrogate measure for functional communication for all persons with aphasia.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS

https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.5851848.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨图片命名表现与传达故事要点或基本要素的能力之间的关系。我们还试图确定这种关系是否因西方失语症成套测验修订版(WAB-R;Kertesz,2007)失语症亚型而有所不同。

方法

从失语症银行数据库中检索了 258 名失语症患者的人口统计学信息、测试分数和 3 项叙事任务的转录本。对叙述进行了主要概念分析,以确定要点的产生。采用相关分析来调查整个失语症患者组以及 WAB-R 亚型组的命名得分与主要概念产生之间的关系。

结果

我们发现,在大量失语症患者中,命名测试得分与叙事要点产生之间存在很强的相关性。然而,相关性的强度因 WAB-R 亚型而异。

结论

图片命名可能可以准确预测 Broca 氏和 Wernicke 氏失语症患者的要点产生,但不能预测其他 WAB-R 亚型。鉴于当前对结果测量的重新优先排序,图片命名可能不是所有失语症患者功能交流的合适替代测量指标。

补充材料

https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.5851848.

相似文献

1
The Relationship Between Confrontation Naming and Story Gist Production in Aphasia.失语症患者命名与故事梗概生成之间的关系。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018 Mar 1;27(1S):406-422. doi: 10.1044/2017_AJSLP-16-0211.
2
Action-naming performance in four syndromes of aphasia.四种失语症综合征中的动作命名表现。
Brain Lang. 1987 Sep;32(1):124-36. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(87)90120-9.
3
Naming to picture versus description in three aphasic subgroups.三种失语亚组中对图片命名与描述命名的比较
Cortex. 1979 Jun;15(2):199-211. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(79)80025-8.
4
Coherence violations and propositional usage in the narratives of fluent aphasics.流畅性失语症患者叙述中的连贯性违反与命题使用
Brain Lang. 1995 Nov;51(2):291-317. doi: 10.1006/brln.1995.1062.
5
An investigation of naming errors following semantic and phonemic cueing.一项关于语义和音素提示后命名错误的调查。
Neuropsychologia. 1991;29(11):1083-93. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(91)90078-m.
6
The importance of word-initial phonology: error patterns in prolonged naming efforts by aphasic patients.词首音系学的重要性:失语症患者在延长命名任务中的错误模式。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1997 Mar;3(2):128-38.
7
The effects of grammatic class and cue type on cueing responsiveness in aphasia.语法类别和线索类型对失语症线索反应性的影响。
Brain Lang. 1990 Jan;38(1):48-60. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(90)90101-l.
8
The effect of stimulus color on naming performance of aphasic adults.刺激颜色对失语症成年人命名表现的影响。
J Commun Disord. 1989 Dec;22(6):397-405. doi: 10.1016/0021-9924(89)90033-6.
9
Processing passive sentences in aphasia: deficits and strategies.失语症中被动句的处理:缺陷与策略
Brain Lang. 1987 Jan;30(1):93-105. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(87)90030-7.
10
The nature of the phonological disorder in conduction aphasia.传导性失语症中语音障碍的本质。
Brain Lang. 1984 Sep;23(1):97-115. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(84)90009-9.

引用本文的文献

1
The curious case of the Cat Rescue: can picture narrative description inform visuospatial processing in aphasia?猫咪救援的奇特案例:图片叙事描述能否为失语症患者的视觉空间处理提供信息?
Front Hum Neurosci. 2025 May 22;19:1574453. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1574453. eCollection 2025.
2
Access to context-specific lexical-semantic information during discourse tasks differentiates speakers with latent aphasia, mild cognitive impairment, and cognitively healthy adults.在话语任务中获取特定语境的词汇语义信息,可区分患有潜在失语症、轻度认知障碍的说话者以及认知健康的成年人。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2025 Jan 22;18:1500735. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1500735. eCollection 2024.
3
Assessing Relative Linguistic Impairment With Model-Based Item Selection.基于模型的项目选择评估相对语言障碍。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2024 Aug 5;67(8):2600-2619. doi: 10.1044/2024_JSLHR-23-00439. Epub 2024 Jul 12.
4
Picture naming test through the prism of cognitive neuroscience and linguistics: adapting the test for cerebellar tumor survivors-or pouring new wine in old sacks?从认知神经科学和语言学角度看图片命名测试:为小脑肿瘤幸存者调整该测试——还是旧瓶装新酒?
Front Psychol. 2024 Mar 19;15:1332391. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1332391. eCollection 2024.
5
Evaluating circumlocution in naming as a predictor of communicative informativeness and efficiency in discourse.评估命名迂回现象作为话语中交际信息量和效率的预测指标。
Aphasiology. 2024;38(2):237-260. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2023.2183076. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
6
Automating Intended Target Identification for Paraphasias in Discourse Using a Large Language Model.使用大型语言模型自动识别话语中的意图目标歧义词。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2023 Dec 11;66(12):4949-4966. doi: 10.1044/2023_JSLHR-23-00121. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
7
Core lexicon in aphasia: A longitudinal study.失语症的核心词汇:一项纵向研究。
Aphasiology. 2023;37(10):1679-1691. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2022.2121598. Epub 2022 Oct 2.
8
The Severity-Calibrated Aphasia Naming Test.《严重程度校准失语症命名测验》
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2022 Nov 16;31(6):2722-2740. doi: 10.1044/2022_AJSLP-22-00071. Epub 2022 Nov 4.
9
Assessment of language impairment and function.语言损伤和功能评估。
Handb Clin Neurol. 2022;185:175-193. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-823384-9.00009-8.
10
What is Functional Communication? A Theoretical Framework for Real-World Communication Applied to Aphasia Rehabilitation.功能性沟通是什么?应用于失语症康复的现实世界沟通的理论框架。
Neuropsychol Rev. 2022 Dec;32(4):937-973. doi: 10.1007/s11065-021-09531-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment Fidelity in Aphasia Research.失语症研究中的评估信度
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2016 Dec 1;25(4S):S788-S797. doi: 10.1044/2016_AJSLP-15-0146.
2
Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke.中风后失语症的言语和语言治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 1;2016(6):CD000425. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000425.pub4.
3
AphasiaBank as BigData.作为大数据的失语症语料库。
Semin Speech Lang. 2016 Feb;37(1):10-22. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1571357. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
4
Verb and sentence production and comprehension in aphasia: Northwestern Assessment of Verbs and Sentences (NAVS).失语症中的动词及句子产出与理解:西北动词与句子评估(NAVS)
Aphasiology. 2012;26(10):1250-1277. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2012.693584.
5
Stability of Word-Retrieval Errors With the AphasiaBank Stimuli.失语症语料库刺激下词语提取错误的稳定性
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015 Nov;24(4):S953-60. doi: 10.1044/2015_AJSLP-14-0152.
6
Core-Lexicon and Main-Concept Production During Picture-Sequence Description in Adults Without Brain Damage and Adults With Aphasia.无脑损伤成年人和失语症成年人在图片序列描述过程中的核心词汇和主要概念生成
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015 Nov;24(4):S923-38. doi: 10.1044/2015_AJSLP-14-0161.
7
The Main Concept Analysis: Validation and sensitivity in differentiating discourse produced by unimpaired English speakers from individuals with aphasia and dementia of Alzheimer type.主要概念分析:区分无语言障碍的英语使用者与失语症患者及阿尔茨海默病型痴呆患者所产生话语的效度和敏感度。
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2016 Oct;41(3):129-41. doi: 10.3109/14015439.2015.1041551. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
8
Development and Simulation Testing of a Computerized Adaptive Version of the Philadelphia Naming Test.费城命名测试计算机自适应版本的开发与模拟测试
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2015 Jun 1;58(3):878-890. doi: 10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-14-0297.
9
Item Response Theory Modeling of the Philadelphia Naming Test.费城命名测试的项目反应理论建模
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2015 Jun 1;58(3):865-877. doi: 10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-14-0249.
10
Test-retest stability of word retrieval in aphasic discourse.失语症语篇中词汇提取的复测稳定性。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2014 Jun 1;57(3):966-78. doi: 10.1044/2014_JSLHR-L-13-0171.