Suppr超能文献

失语症患者命名与故事梗概生成之间的关系。

The Relationship Between Confrontation Naming and Story Gist Production in Aphasia.

机构信息

University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.

Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.

出版信息

Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018 Mar 1;27(1S):406-422. doi: 10.1044/2017_AJSLP-16-0211.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between picture naming performance and the ability to communicate the gist, or essential elements, of a story. We also sought to determine if this relationship varied according to Western Aphasia Battery-Revised (WAB-R; Kertesz, 2007) aphasia subtype.

METHOD

Demographic information, test scores, and transcripts of 258 individuals with aphasia completing 3 narrative tasks were retrieved from the AphasiaBank database. Narratives were subjected to a main concept analysis to determine gist production. A correlation analysis was used to investigate the relationship between naming scores and main concept production for the whole group of persons with aphasia and for WAB-R subtypes separately.

RESULTS

We found strong correlations between naming test scores and narrative gist production for the large sample of persons with aphasia. However, the strength of the correlations varied by WAB-R subtype.

CONCLUSIONS

Picture naming may accurately predict gist production for individuals with Broca's and Wernicke's aphasia, but not for other WAB-R subtypes. Given the current reprioritization of outcome measurement, picture naming may not be an appropriate surrogate measure for functional communication for all persons with aphasia.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS

https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.5851848.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨图片命名表现与传达故事要点或基本要素的能力之间的关系。我们还试图确定这种关系是否因西方失语症成套测验修订版(WAB-R;Kertesz,2007)失语症亚型而有所不同。

方法

从失语症银行数据库中检索了 258 名失语症患者的人口统计学信息、测试分数和 3 项叙事任务的转录本。对叙述进行了主要概念分析,以确定要点的产生。采用相关分析来调查整个失语症患者组以及 WAB-R 亚型组的命名得分与主要概念产生之间的关系。

结果

我们发现,在大量失语症患者中,命名测试得分与叙事要点产生之间存在很强的相关性。然而,相关性的强度因 WAB-R 亚型而异。

结论

图片命名可能可以准确预测 Broca 氏和 Wernicke 氏失语症患者的要点产生,但不能预测其他 WAB-R 亚型。鉴于当前对结果测量的重新优先排序,图片命名可能不是所有失语症患者功能交流的合适替代测量指标。

补充材料

https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.5851848.

相似文献

引用本文的文献

3
Assessing Relative Linguistic Impairment With Model-Based Item Selection.基于模型的项目选择评估相对语言障碍。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2024 Aug 5;67(8):2600-2619. doi: 10.1044/2024_JSLHR-23-00439. Epub 2024 Jul 12.
7
Core lexicon in aphasia: A longitudinal study.失语症的核心词汇:一项纵向研究。
Aphasiology. 2023;37(10):1679-1691. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2022.2121598. Epub 2022 Oct 2.
8
The Severity-Calibrated Aphasia Naming Test.《严重程度校准失语症命名测验》
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2022 Nov 16;31(6):2722-2740. doi: 10.1044/2022_AJSLP-22-00071. Epub 2022 Nov 4.
9
Assessment of language impairment and function.语言损伤和功能评估。
Handb Clin Neurol. 2022;185:175-193. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-823384-9.00009-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment Fidelity in Aphasia Research.失语症研究中的评估信度
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2016 Dec 1;25(4S):S788-S797. doi: 10.1044/2016_AJSLP-15-0146.
2
Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke.中风后失语症的言语和语言治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 1;2016(6):CD000425. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000425.pub4.
3
AphasiaBank as BigData.作为大数据的失语症语料库。
Semin Speech Lang. 2016 Feb;37(1):10-22. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1571357. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
5
Stability of Word-Retrieval Errors With the AphasiaBank Stimuli.失语症语料库刺激下词语提取错误的稳定性
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015 Nov;24(4):S953-60. doi: 10.1044/2015_AJSLP-14-0152.
9
Item Response Theory Modeling of the Philadelphia Naming Test.费城命名测试的项目反应理论建模
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2015 Jun 1;58(3):865-877. doi: 10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-14-0249.
10
Test-retest stability of word retrieval in aphasic discourse.失语症语篇中词汇提取的复测稳定性。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2014 Jun 1;57(3):966-78. doi: 10.1044/2014_JSLHR-L-13-0171.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验