Christiansen J A
Aphasia Research Center, Boston University School of Medicine, USA.
Brain Lang. 1995 Nov;51(2):291-317. doi: 10.1006/brln.1995.1062.
Aphasic patients have been generally assumed to produce coherent narratives, despite their numerous surface structure deficits. The current study is designed to analyze three types of coherence violations (i.e., information gaps, repetitions of propositions, and irrelevant propositions) in the narratives of mildly impaired conduction, anomic, and Wernicke's aphasics. Results reveal that the three aphasic groups produce qualitatively different patterns of coherence violations. It is hypothesized that these coherence violations reflect adaptive strategies used by the aphasic patients to compensate for their underlying impairments. While the anomic and conduction aphasics appear to compensate for surface structure deficits, the Wernicke's aphasics seem to have an underlying coherence deficit.
尽管失语症患者存在诸多表层结构缺陷,但一般认为他们能够生成连贯的叙述。当前的研究旨在分析轻度传导性失语症、命名性失语症和韦尼克失语症患者叙述中的三种连贯违反类型(即信息缺口、命题重复和无关命题)。结果显示,这三个失语症群体产生了质的不同的连贯违反模式。据推测,这些连贯违反反映了失语症患者用来补偿其潜在损伤的适应性策略。虽然命名性失语症和传导性失语症患者似乎在补偿表层结构缺陷,但韦尼克失语症患者似乎存在潜在的连贯缺陷。