Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2012 May;22(5):347-55. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2011.09.009. Epub 2011 Nov 17.
Patients with severe major depressive disorder are more likely than those with mild/moderate depression to experience the relative benefits of antidepressant therapy versus placebo. Several studies have, unexpectedly, failed to show a similar antidepressant-placebo discrepancy between patients with versus without anxious depression, although patients with anxious depression are more likely to meet criteria for severe depression than those without. The aim of this study was to confirm the absence of treatment moderating effects for anxious depression in a general clinical trial population, and to examine for the presence of treatment moderating effects in severe depression. Patient-level outcome data from all randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials involving the use of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor escitalopram for adults with major depressive disorder sponsored by H. Lundbeck A/S or Forest Laboratories were pooled. Studies focusing on patients with a specific axis-I or -III co-morbidity were excluded. Data from five trials were pooled. Anxious depression was not found to serve as a treatment moderator for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor therapy versus placebo. However, when patients with severe depression were analyzed separately, anxious depression significantly influenced the relative degree of symptom reduction with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors versus placebo (p=0.0094). In fact, the numbers needed to treat for remission for these two sub-types were the largest and smallest reported to date from analyses of large datasets of antidepressants (22 for severe anxious versus 4 for severe non-anxious depression). Subdividing patients with severe major depressive disorder into those with versus without anxious depression results in the characterization of sub-types that are particularly "responsive" (severe non-anxious) and "unresponsive" (severe anxious) to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor therapy (relative to placebo). These findings are preliminary, of yet undetermined clinical relevance, and warrant replication and further exploration.
患有严重重度抑郁症的患者比轻度/中度抑郁症患者更有可能体验到抗抑郁药物治疗与安慰剂相比的相对益处。尽管患有焦虑性抑郁症的患者比没有焦虑性抑郁症的患者更有可能符合重度抑郁症的标准,但几项研究出乎意料地未能显示出患有焦虑性抑郁症的患者与没有焦虑性抑郁症的患者之间抗抑郁药物与安慰剂之间的类似差异。本研究的目的是在一般临床试验人群中确认焦虑性抑郁症不存在治疗调节作用,并检查重度抑郁症中是否存在治疗调节作用。将涉及使用选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂 escitalopram 治疗由 H. Lundbeck A/S 或 Forest Laboratories 赞助的成人重度抑郁症的所有随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验的患者水平结局数据进行了汇总。排除了专注于特定轴 I 或 III 合并症的患者的研究。汇总了五项试验的数据。没有发现焦虑性抑郁症是选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂治疗与安慰剂的治疗调节剂。然而,当单独分析重度抑郁症患者时,焦虑性抑郁症显著影响了选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂与安慰剂相比的症状缓解程度(p=0.0094)。事实上,这些两种亚型的缓解需要治疗的人数是迄今为止从抗抑郁药大型数据集分析中报告的最大和最小的(重度焦虑型为 22,重度非焦虑型为 4)。将重度重度抑郁症患者分为有焦虑和无焦虑两类,导致了对选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂治疗(相对于安慰剂)特别“敏感”(重度非焦虑)和“不敏感”(重度焦虑)的亚型的特征化。这些发现是初步的,尚未确定其临床相关性,需要复制和进一步探索。