• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于 INFORM 结构化分类分类法的急性护理期间感染风险时刻的频率和性质。

Frequency and Nature of Infectious Risk Moments During Acute Care Based on the INFORM Structured Classification Taxonomy.

机构信息

1Department of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology,University Hospital Zurich,University of Zurich,Zurich,Switzerland.

2Institute for Patient Safety,University Hospital Bonn,Bonn,Germany.

出版信息

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2018 Mar;39(3):272-279. doi: 10.1017/ice.2017.326.

DOI:10.1017/ice.2017.326
PMID:29498339
Abstract

OBJECTIVE In this study, we sought to establish a comprehensive inventory of infectious risk moments (IRMs), defined as seemingly innocuous yet frequently occurring care manipulations potentially resulting in transfer of pathogens to patients. We also aimed to develop and employ an observational taxonomy to quantify the frequency and nature of IRMs in acute-care settings. DESIGN Prospective observational study and establishment of observational taxonomy. SETTING Intensive care unit, general medical ward, and emergency ward of a university-affiliated hospital. PARTICIPANTS Healthcare workers (HCWs) METHODS Exploratory observations were conducted to identify IRMs, which were coded based on the surfaces involved in the transmission pathway to establish a structured taxonomy. Structured observations were performed using this taxonomy to quantify IRMs in all 3 settings. RESULTS Following 129.17 hours of exploratory observations, identified IRMs involved HCW hands, gloves, care devices, mobile objects, and HCW clothing and accessories. A structured taxonomy called INFORM (INFectiOus Risk Moment) was established to classify each IRM according to the source, vector, and endpoint of potential pathogen transfer. We observed 1,138 IRMs during 53.77 hours of structured observations (31.25 active care hours) for an average foundation of 42.8 IRMs per active care hour overall, and average densities of 34.9, 36.8, and 56.3 IRMs in the intensive care, medical, and emergency wards, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Hands and gloves remain among the most important contributors to the transfer of pathogens within the healthcare setting, but medical devices, mobile objects, invasive devices, and HCW clothing and accessories may also contribute to patient colonization and/or infection. The INFORM observational taxonomy and IRM inventory presented may benefit clinical risk assessment, training and education, and future research. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2018;39:272-279.

摘要

目的 在本研究中,我们旨在建立一个全面的感染风险时刻(IRM)清单,将其定义为看似无害但经常发生的护理操作,这些操作可能导致病原体转移到患者身上。我们还旨在开发和采用观察分类法来量化急性护理环境中 IRM 的频率和性质。

设计 前瞻性观察研究和观察分类法的建立。

地点 一所大学附属医院的重症监护病房、普通内科病房和急诊病房。

参与者 医护人员(HCWs)

方法 进行探索性观察以确定 IRM,根据涉及传播途径的表面对其进行编码,以建立结构化分类法。使用该分类法对所有 3 种环境中的 IRM 进行结构化观察。

结果 在进行了 129.17 小时的探索性观察后,确定的 IRM 涉及 HCW 的手、手套、护理设备、移动物体以及 HCW 的衣物和配饰。建立了一个名为 INFORM(INFectiOus Risk Moment)的结构化分类法,根据潜在病原体转移的来源、载体和终点对每个 IRM 进行分类。我们在 53.77 小时的结构化观察(31.25 小时的主动护理时间)中观察到 1138 个 IRM,总的平均每个主动护理时间有 42.8 个 IRM,在重症监护病房、内科病房和急诊病房中的平均密度分别为 34.9、36.8 和 56.3 个 IRM。

结论 在医疗机构内,手和手套仍然是病原体转移的最重要因素,但医疗器械、移动物体、侵入性器械以及 HCW 的衣物和配饰也可能导致患者定植和/或感染。所提出的 INFORM 观察分类法和 IRM 清单可能有助于临床风险评估、培训和教育以及未来的研究。

传染病控制与医院流行病学 2018 年;39 期:272-279

相似文献

1
Frequency and Nature of Infectious Risk Moments During Acute Care Based on the INFORM Structured Classification Taxonomy.基于 INFORM 结构化分类分类法的急性护理期间感染风险时刻的频率和性质。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2018 Mar;39(3):272-279. doi: 10.1017/ice.2017.326.
2
Likelihood of Infectious Outcomes Following Infectious Risk Moments During Patient Care-An International Expert Consensus Study and Quantitative Risk Index.患者护理期间感染风险时刻后的感染结果可能性:国际专家共识研究和定量风险指数。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2018 Mar;39(3):280-289. doi: 10.1017/ice.2017.327.
3
Risk of hand or glove contamination after contact with patients colonized with vancomycin-resistant enterococcus or the colonized patients' environment.接触耐万古霉素肠球菌定植患者或其定植环境后手部或手套被污染的风险。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008 Feb;29(2):149-54. doi: 10.1086/524331.
4
Infectious risk moments: a novel, human factors-informed approach to infection prevention.感染风险时刻:一种新颖的、基于人为因素的感染预防方法。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014 Aug;35(8):1051-5. doi: 10.1086/677166. Epub 2014 Jun 20.
5
Impact of doffing errors on healthcare worker self-contamination when caring for patients on contact precautions.脱卸防护装备错误对接触防护患者医护人员自身污染的影响。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2019 May;40(5):559-565. doi: 10.1017/ice.2019.33. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
6
Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci on the gowns and gloves of healthcare workers.医护人员工作服和手套上耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌及耐万古霉素肠球菌的检测
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008 Jul;29(7):583-9. doi: 10.1086/588701.
7
Patterns of handwashing behavior and visits to patients on a general medical ward of healthcare workers.医护人员在综合内科病房的洗手行为模式及看望患者情况。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2004 Mar;25(3):198-202. doi: 10.1086/502377.
8
Compliance with routine use of gowns by healthcare workers (HCWs) and non-HCW visitors on entry into the rooms of patients under contact precautions.医护人员(HCWs)和非医护人员访客进入采取接触预防措施的患者房间时,遵守常规穿隔离衣的规定。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007 Mar;28(3):337-40. doi: 10.1086/510811. Epub 2007 Feb 20.
9
Enhancing the evaluation of pathogen transmission risk in a hospital by merging hand-hygiene compliance and contact data: a proof-of-concept study.通过整合手卫生依从性和接触数据来加强医院病原体传播风险评估:一项概念验证研究
BMC Res Notes. 2015 Sep 10;8:426. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1409-0.
10
Contamination of healthcare workers' hands with Clostridium difficile spores after caring for patients with C. difficile infection.医护人员在护理艰难梭菌感染患者后手部被艰难梭菌孢子污染。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014 Jan;35(1):10-5. doi: 10.1086/674396. Epub 2013 Nov 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceptions of distinctions between patient and healthcare zones among intensive care unit nurses at a Korean tertiary hospital: A cross-sectional study.韩国某三甲医院重症监护室护士对患者区和医疗区之间区别的认知:一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 15;19(11):e0311298. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311298. eCollection 2024.
2
Alcohol-based decontamination of gloved hands: A randomized controlled trial.酒精擦手消毒:一项随机对照试验。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2024 Apr;45(4):467-473. doi: 10.1017/ice.2023.243. Epub 2023 Nov 23.
3
Direct Gloving vs Hand Hygiene Before Donning Gloves in Adherence to Hospital Infection Control Practices: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.
直接戴手套与戴手套前手部卫生依从医院感染控制实践:一项整群随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Oct 2;6(10):e2336758. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.36758.
4
Development and Validation of the Infection Prevention Appraisal Scale.感染预防评估量表的编制与验证
Nurs Rep. 2023 Jan 31;13(1):157-165. doi: 10.3390/nursrep13010017.
5
The problem with 'My Five Moments for Hand Hygiene'.“我的五个手卫生时刻”存在的问题。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2022 Apr;31(4):322-326. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-011911. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
6
Exploring healthcare providers' mental models of the infection prevention "patient zone" - a concept mapping study.探索医疗保健提供者对感染预防“患者区域”的心理模型 - 一项概念映射研究。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2019 Aug 14;8:138. doi: 10.1186/s13756-019-0593-4. eCollection 2019.