Suppr超能文献

患者护理期间感染风险时刻后的感染结果可能性:国际专家共识研究和定量风险指数。

Likelihood of Infectious Outcomes Following Infectious Risk Moments During Patient Care-An International Expert Consensus Study and Quantitative Risk Index.

机构信息

1Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology,University Hospital Zurich,University of Zurich,Zurich,Switzerland.

2Institute for Patient Safety,University Hospital Bonn,Bonn,Germany.

出版信息

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2018 Mar;39(3):280-289. doi: 10.1017/ice.2017.327.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To elicit expert consensus on the likelihood of infectious outcomes (patient colonization or infection) following a broad range of infectious risk moments (IRMs) from observations in acute care. DESIGN Expert consensus study using modified Delphi technique. PARTICIPANTS Panel of 40 international experts including nurses, physicians and microbiologists specialized in infectious diseases and infection prevention and control (IPC). METHODS The modified Delphi process consisted of 3 online survey rounds, with feedback of mean ratings and expert comments between rounds. The Delphi survey comprised 52 care scenarios representing observed IRMs organized into 6 sections: hands, gloves, medical devices, mobile objects, invasive procedures, and additional moments. For each scenario, experts indicated the likelihood of both patient colonization and infection on a scale from 0 to 5 (high). Expert ratings were plotted against frequencies of IRMs observed during actual patient care resulting in a risk index. RESULTS Following 3 rounds, consensus was achieved for 92 of 104 items (88.5%). The mean ratings across all scenarios for likelihood of colonization and infection were 2.68 and 2.02, respectively. The likelihood of colonization was rated higher than infection for 48 of 52 scenarios. Ratings were significantly higher for colonization (P=.001) and infection (P<.0005) when the scenario involved transfer of pathogens to critical patient sites. CONCLUSIONS The design of effective IPC strategies requires the selection of behaviors according to their impact on patient outcomes. The IRM index reported here provides a basis for standardizing and prioritizing targets for quality improvement initiatives, training, and future research in acute health care. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2018;39:280-289.

摘要

目的

从急性护理中观察到的广泛感染风险时刻(IRM)中,就感染结果(患者定植或感染)的可能性得出专家共识。

设计

采用改良 Delphi 技术的专家共识研究。

参与者

包括护士、医生和微生物学家在内的 40 名国际专家组成的小组,他们专门从事传染病和感染预防与控制(IPC)工作。

方法

改良 Delphi 流程包括 3 轮在线调查,每轮调查之间会反馈平均评分和专家意见。Delphi 调查包括 52 个护理场景,代表观察到的 IRM,分为 6 个部分:手、手套、医疗器械、移动物品、有创性程序和其他时刻。对于每个场景,专家根据患者护理过程中观察到的 IRM 的频率,对患者定植和感染的可能性进行 0-5 分(高)的评分。将专家评分与实际患者护理过程中观察到的 IRM 频率进行对比,得出风险指数。

结果

经过 3 轮调查,104 项中的 92 项(88.5%)达成共识。所有场景中,定植和感染的平均评分分别为 2.68 和 2.02。52 个场景中,有 48 个场景的定植可能性评分高于感染。涉及病原体转移到关键患者部位的场景,定植(P=.001)和感染(P<.0005)的评分明显更高。

结论

设计有效的 IPC 策略需要根据其对患者结局的影响来选择行为。本文报道的 IRM 指数为标准化和优先考虑急性医疗保健中质量改进举措、培训和未来研究的目标提供了依据。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验