Wilms G, Nevelsteen A, Baert A, Suy R
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1987;10(1):8-12. doi: 10.1007/BF02583298.
Of 768 angioplasties performed in our institute, 42 procedures (5%) in 39 patients were performed by a radiologist in the operating room in combination with vascular surgery; 15 ilial, 20 femoral, 5 tibial, 1 renal, and 1 brachiocephalic artery stenoses were treated. Immediate and late successes, as well as the complication rates, were comparable to those of the percutaneous approach. The main reasons for the intraoperative approach were absence of arterial pulsations, ulcerative lesions at the puncture site with risk of peripheral embolisation, and the opportunity of a surgical arteriotomy offering access to an otherwise unreachable stenotic artery. The advantages of intraoperative dilatation in combination with surgery over simple operation are the reduction of operative morbidity and mortality, shortening of the operative time, and improved results by reassuring the in- or outflow of the operated territory. The main disadvantages are the limited fluoroscopic field and the limited mobility of the fluoroscopy device.
在我们研究所进行的768例血管成形术中,39例患者的42例手术(5%)由放射科医生在手术室与血管外科联合进行;治疗了15例髂动脉、20例股动脉、5例胫动脉、1例肾动脉和1例头臂动脉狭窄。即刻和远期成功率以及并发症发生率与经皮治疗方法相当。术中治疗的主要原因是无动脉搏动、穿刺部位有溃疡性病变且有外周栓塞风险,以及手术切开动脉可提供进入其他难以到达的狭窄动脉的机会。术中扩张联合手术相对于单纯手术的优点是降低手术发病率和死亡率、缩短手术时间以及通过确保手术区域的流入或流出而改善结果。主要缺点是透视视野有限以及透视设备的移动性受限。