Department of Food, Bioprocessing and Nutrition Sciences, Southeast Dairy Foods Research Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27695.
Department of Food Science, Northeast Dairy Foods Research Center, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853.
J Dairy Sci. 2018 May;101(5):3900-3909. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13780. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
Traditionally most protein ingredients are sold as a powder due to transport ease and longer shelf life. Many high-protein powder ingredients such as milk protein concentrate with 85% protein and micellar casein concentrate have poor rehydration properties (e.g., solubility) after storage, which might limit their use. An alternative to the production of dried protein ingredients is the option to use liquid protein ingredients, which saves the cost of spray drying, but may also improve flavor and offer different functional properties. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of spray drying on the flavor and functionality of high-protein ingredients. Liquid and dried protein ingredients (whey protein concentrate with 80% protein, whey protein isolate, milk protein concentrate with 85% protein, and micellar casein concentrate) were manufactured from the same lot of milk at the North Carolina State University pilot plant. Functional differences were evaluated by measurement of foam stability and heat stability. Heat stability was evaluated by heating at 90°C for 0, 10, 20, and 30 min followed by micro-bicinchoninic acid and turbidity loss measurements. Sensory properties were evaluated by descriptive analysis, and volatile compounds were evaluated by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. No differences were detected in protein heat stability between liquids and powders when spray dried under these conditions. Whey protein concentrate with 80% protein (liquid or spray dried) did not produce a foam. All powders had higher aroma intensity and cooked flavors compared with liquids. Powder proteins also had low but distinct cardboard flavor concurrent with higher relative abundance of volatile aldehydes compared with liquids. An understanding of how spray drying affects both flavor and functionality may help food processors better use the ingredients they have available to them.
传统上,大多数蛋白质成分都是以粉末形式销售的,因为这样便于运输且保质期更长。许多高蛋白粉末成分,如蛋白质含量为 85%的乳清浓缩蛋白和胶束酪蛋白浓缩物,在储存后具有较差的复水特性(例如溶解度),这可能限制了它们的使用。生产干燥蛋白质成分的替代方法是使用液体蛋白质成分,这可以节省喷雾干燥的成本,但也可能改善风味并提供不同的功能特性。本研究的目的是确定喷雾干燥对高蛋白成分风味和功能的影响。液体和干燥的蛋白质成分(蛋白质含量为 80%的乳清浓缩蛋白、乳清分离蛋白、蛋白质含量为 85%的乳清浓缩蛋白和胶束酪蛋白浓缩物)是在北卡罗来纳州立大学的中试工厂中用同一批牛奶生产的。通过测定泡沫稳定性和热稳定性来评估功能差异。通过在 90°C 下加热 0、10、20 和 30 分钟来评估热稳定性,然后进行微量双缩脲和浊度损失测量。通过描述性分析评估感官特性,通过气相色谱-质谱法评估挥发性化合物。在这些条件下喷雾干燥时,液体和粉末之间的蛋白质热稳定性没有差异。无论液体还是喷雾干燥的 80%蛋白质含量的乳清浓缩蛋白都不能产生泡沫。与液体相比,所有粉末的香气强度和煮熟风味都更高。与液体相比,粉末蛋白质的纸板味也较低,但很明显,同时挥发性醛的相对丰度较高。了解喷雾干燥如何影响风味和功能特性,可能有助于食品加工商更好地利用他们现有的成分。