Department of Food Science and Technology, College of Agricultural Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
Nutrition Program, School of Nutrition and Public Health, College of Health, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
J Food Sci. 2024 Nov;89(11):7477-7493. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.17349. Epub 2024 Oct 4.
Whey protein concentrate (WPC) is consumed for its high protein content. The structure and biological functionality of whey proteins in WPC powders may be affected by the drying technique applied. However, the specific impact of spray drying and freeze drying on the overall protein profile of whey protein derived from sweet whey streams at scale is unknown. Herein, we examine the effects of commercial-scale freeze drying and spray drying on WPC to determine which method better preserves bioactive whey proteins, with the goal of helping the dairy industry create high-value products that meet the growing consumer demand for functional dairy products. WPCs were produced from pasteurized liquid whey using either a commercial spray dryer or freeze dryer. A variety of analytical techniques, including enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and bottom-up proteomics using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectroscopy were used to identify, quantify, and compare the retention of bioactive proteins in WPC before and after spray drying and freeze drying. In addition, the extent of denaturation was studied via solubility testing, differential scanning calorimetry, and hydrophobicity assessment. There was little to no difference in the retention or denaturation of key bioactive proteins between spray-dried and freeze-dried WPC powders. There was a higher percentage of select Maillard modifications in freeze-dried and spray-dried powders than in the control. The lack of significant differences between spray drying and freeze drying identified herein indicates that freeze drying does not meaningfully improve retention of bioactive proteins compared with spray drying when performed after multiple pasteurization steps. PRACTICAL APPLICATION: This study aimed to provide insight into the impacts of spray drying versus freeze drying on whey proteins. Overall, our results indicate that for commercial dairy processing that involves multiple rounds of pasteurization, freeze drying does not meaningfully improve the retention of bioactive proteins compared with spray drying. These findings may help the food and dairy industry make informed decisions regarding the processing of its whey protein products to optimize nutritional value.
乳清蛋白浓缩物 (WPC) 因其高蛋白含量而被食用。WPC 粉末中的乳清蛋白的结构和生物功能可能会受到所应用的干燥技术的影响。然而,喷雾干燥和冷冻干燥对大规模甜乳清流衍生的 WPC 整体蛋白质谱的具体影响尚不清楚。在此,我们研究了商业规模的冷冻干燥和喷雾干燥对 WPC 的影响,以确定哪种方法更能保留生物活性乳清蛋白,旨在帮助乳制品行业创造高附加值的产品,以满足消费者对功能性乳制品不断增长的需求。WPC 是使用商业喷雾干燥器或冷冻干燥器从巴氏杀菌的液态乳清中生产的。使用多种分析技术,包括酶联免疫吸附测定、聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳和使用液相色谱-串联质谱的自上而下的蛋白质组学,来鉴定、定量和比较喷雾干燥和冷冻干燥前后 WPC 中生物活性蛋白质的保留情况。此外,还通过溶解度测试、差示扫描量热法和疏水性评估来研究变性程度。喷雾干燥和冷冻干燥的 WPC 粉末中关键生物活性蛋白质的保留或变性几乎没有差异。与对照相比,冷冻干燥和喷雾干燥粉末中存在更高比例的选择美拉德修饰。本文中确定的喷雾干燥和冷冻干燥之间没有显著差异表明,与多次巴氏杀菌后进行的喷雾干燥相比,冷冻干燥并没有显著提高生物活性蛋白质的保留率。实际应用:本研究旨在深入了解喷雾干燥与冷冻干燥对乳清蛋白的影响。总的来说,我们的结果表明,对于涉及多次巴氏杀菌的商业乳制品加工,与喷雾干燥相比,冷冻干燥并不能显著提高生物活性蛋白质的保留率。这些发现可能有助于食品和乳制品行业在处理其乳清蛋白产品时做出明智的决策,以优化营养价值。