Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Division, Padua University, School of Medicine, Padua, Italy.
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Division, Padua University, School of Medicine, Padua, Italy.
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Jul;68(1):109-117. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.09.055. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
The objective of this study was to perform a quantitative analysis and to identify predictors of embolic filter debris (EFD) load during carotid artery stenting (CAS) in asymptomatic patients.
All patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis >70% undergoing CAS between 2008 and 2016 were included in a prospective database. A distal filter protection device was used in all patients. At the end of the procedure, the filter was fixed in formalin and then analyzed with a stereomicroscope. Morphometric analysis was performed with Image-Pro Plus software (Media Cybernetics, Rockville, Md). The total area of the filter membrane and the area covered by particulate material were quantified. The quantity of membrane occupied by debris was expressed as percentage of covered surface area. Anatomic and clinical variables were evaluated for their association with EFD load using multiple logistic regression.
Among the 278 patients undergoing CAS, an open-cell stent was implanted in 211 patients (76%); 67 patients (24%) received a closed-cell stent. Overall technical success and clinical success were both 99%; no perioperative death was reported. Stroke rate was 1.8% (major, n = 1 [0.4%]; minor, n = 4 [1.4%]); transient ischemic attacks occurred in 5% of cases (n = 14). The quantitative analysis of the filter revealed that EFD was present in 74% of cases (n = 207). The mean EFD load was 10% of the filter surface (median, 1; range, 0-80); it was <10% in 203 patients (73%), between 11% and 20% in 39 patients (14%), between 21% and 30% in 14 patients (5%), and >31% in 22 (8%). Patients with any type of ischemic neurologic event after CAS (stroke and transient ischemic attack) had a significantly higher mean EFD load compared with uneventful cases (26.7% ± 19.0% vs 8.5% ± 13.5%; P < .001). The observational frequency distribution analysis identified the presence of >12.5% EFD load as the optimal cutoff for the association with clinically relevant perioperative ischemic events (sensitivity, 78%; specificity, 77%; area under the curve, 0.81). The multivariate analysis demonstrated that age >75 years (odds ratio [OR], 2.56; P = .003), pre-existing ipsilateral ischemic cerebral lesions (OR, 2.09; P = .047), hypoechogenic plaque on the preoperative duplex ultrasound examination (OR, 6.05; P < .001), and plaque length >15 mm (OR, 1.79; P = .049) were independent predictors of EFD load >12.5%.
The majority of asymptomatic carotid stenoses treated with CAS have detectable embolic debris in the protecting filter. Age >75 years, pre-existing ipsilateral cerebral ischemic lesions, hypoechogenic plaque, and plaque length >15 mm should be taken into consideration as independent predictors of clinically relevant embolic debris during the procedure.
本研究旨在对无症状颈动脉狭窄患者行颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)过程中滤器内栓塞碎片(EFD)负荷进行定量分析,并确定其预测因素。
纳入 2008 年至 2016 年间行 CAS 治疗且无症状颈动脉狭窄>70%的所有患者,前瞻性纳入数据库。所有患者均使用远端滤器保护装置。手术结束时,将滤器固定在福尔马林溶液中,然后用体视显微镜进行分析。使用 Image-Pro Plus 软件(Media Cybernetics,Rockville,MD)进行形态计量学分析。定量分析滤器膜的总面积和被颗粒物质覆盖的面积。用碎片覆盖的滤器膜面积表示为覆盖表面积的百分比。使用多因素逻辑回归评估解剖和临床变量与 EFD 负荷的相关性。
在 278 例行 CAS 的患者中,211 例(76%)植入了开孔支架,67 例(24%)植入了闭孔支架。总体技术成功率和临床成功率均为 99%;无围手术期死亡。卒中发生率为 1.8%(主要,n=1[0.4%];次要,n=4[1.4%]);5%的患者发生短暂性脑缺血发作(n=14)。滤器的定量分析显示,74%的病例(n=207)存在 EFD(图 1)。EFD 负荷的平均百分比为滤器表面的 10%(中位数,1;范围,0-80);203 例(73%)患者<10%,39 例(14%)患者为 11%-20%,14 例(5%)患者为 21%-30%,22 例(8%)患者>31%。与无脑缺血性神经事件的患者相比,CAS 后发生任何类型缺血性神经事件(卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作)的患者的 EFD 负荷明显更高(26.7%±19.0% vs 8.5%±13.5%;P<.001)。观察频率分布分析确定>12.5%的 EFD 负荷是与围手术期相关缺血性事件相关的最佳截断值(灵敏度,78%;特异性,77%;曲线下面积,0.81)。多因素分析显示,年龄>75 岁(比值比[OR],2.56;P=.003)、同侧缺血性脑病变(OR,2.09;P=.047)、术前双功超声检查低回声斑块(OR,6.05;P<.001)和斑块长度>15 mm(OR,1.79;P=.049)是 EFD 负荷>12.5%的独立预测因素。
大多数接受 CAS 治疗的无症状颈动脉狭窄患者的保护滤器中都存在可检测到的栓塞碎片。年龄>75 岁、同侧存在缺血性脑病变、低回声斑块和斑块长度>15 mm 应被视为术中发生有临床意义的栓塞碎片的独立预测因素。