• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈动脉支架设计对颈动脉支架置入术中滤器栓塞碎片负荷的影响。

Impact of Carotid Stent Design on Embolic Filter Debris Load During Carotid Artery Stenting.

机构信息

Section of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery (F.S., M.P., E.F., E.C.C., F.G., M.A.), Department of Cardiac Thoracic Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, Italy.

Section of Cardio Thoracic and Vascular Pathology (A.A., M.F.), Department of Cardiac Thoracic Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, Italy.

出版信息

Stroke. 2023 Oct;54(10):2534-2541. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.043117. Epub 2023 Aug 18.

DOI:10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.043117
PMID:37593847
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The carotid stent design may influence the risk of embolization during carotid artery stenting. The aim of the study was to assess this risk by comparing the quantity of embolized material captured by filters during carotid artery stenting, using different stent designs.

METHODS

We conducted a single-center retrospective study of patients undergoing carotid artery stenting for asymptomatic carotid stenosis >70% (2010-2022) in a tertiary academic hospital (Padua University Hospital, Italy). Carotid stents were classified according to their design as open-cell (OCS), closed-cell (CCS), or micromesh stents (MMS). A distal filter protection was used in all patients, and the amount of captured embolized particles was semiautomatically analyzed using a dedicated software (Image-Pro Plus, Media Cybernetics). Primary end point was embolic filter debris (EFD) load, defined as the ratio of the filter area covered by particulate material to the total filter area. Secondary end points were 30 days major stroke and death.

RESULTS

Four-hundred-eighty-one carotid artery stentings were included; 171 (35%) using an OCS, 68 (14%) a CCS, and 242 (50%) a MMS. Thirty-days mortality was 0.2% (n=1) and major stroke rate was 0.2% (=0.987). Filters of patients receiving MMS were more likely to be free from embolized material (OCS, 30%; CCS, 13%; MMS, 41%; <0.001) and had a lower EFD load (OCS, 9.1±14.5%; CCS, 7.9±14.0%; MMS, 5.0±9.1%; <0.001) compared with other stent designs. After stratification by plaque characteristics, MMS had a lower EFD load in cases of hypoechogenic plaque (OCS, 13.4±9.9%; CCS, 10.9±8.7%; MMS, 6.5±13.1%; <0.001), plaque length>15 mm (OC, 10.2±15.3; CC, 8.6±12.4; MM, 8.2±13.6; <0.001), and preoperative ipsilateral asymptomatic ischemic cerebral lesion (OCS, 12.9±16.8%; CCS, 8.7±19.5%; MMS, 5.4±9.7%; <0.001). After multivariate linear regression, use of MMS was associated with lower EFD load (=0.038).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of MMS seems to be associated with a lower embolization rate and EFD load, especially in hypoechogenic and long plaques and in patients with a preoperative evidence of asymptomatic ischemic cerebral lesion.

摘要

背景

颈动脉支架的设计可能会影响颈动脉支架置入术中的栓塞风险。本研究旨在通过比较不同支架设计在颈动脉支架置入术中使用的过滤器捕获的栓塞材料的数量来评估这种风险。

方法

我们进行了一项单中心回顾性研究,纳入了在意大利帕多瓦大学医院(Padua University Hospital)因无症状性颈动脉狭窄>70%(2010-2022 年)而行颈动脉支架置入术的患者。根据支架设计将颈动脉支架分为开腔(OCS)、闭腔(CCS)或微孔支架(MMS)。所有患者均使用远端滤器保护,使用专用软件(Image-Pro Plus,Media Cybernetics)半自动分析捕获的栓塞颗粒的数量。主要终点是栓塞滤器碎片(EFD)负荷,定义为颗粒物质覆盖的滤器面积与总滤器面积的比值。次要终点是 30 天主要卒中与死亡。

结果

共纳入 481 例颈动脉支架置入术,其中 171 例(35%)使用 OCS,68 例(14%)使用 CCS,242 例(50%)使用 MMS。30 天死亡率为 0.2%(n=1),主要卒中发生率为 0.2%(n=0.987)。接受 MMS 治疗的患者的过滤器更有可能没有栓塞物质(OCS,30%;CCS,13%;MMS,41%;<0.001),EFD 负荷也更低(OCS,9.1±14.5%;CCS,7.9±14.0%;MMS,5.0±9.1%;<0.001),与其他支架设计相比。根据斑块特征进行分层后,在低回声斑块(OCS,13.4±9.9%;CCS,10.9±8.7%;MMS,6.5±13.1%;<0.001)、斑块长度>15mm(OC,10.2±15.3;CC,8.6±12.4;MM,8.2±13.6;<0.001)和术前同侧无症状性缺血性脑病变(OCS,12.9±16.8%;CCS,8.7±19.5%;MMS,5.4±9.7%;<0.001)患者中,MMS 的 EFD 负荷更低。多变量线性回归分析显示,使用 MMS 与较低的 EFD 负荷相关(=0.038)。

结论

与其他支架设计相比,使用 MMS 似乎与较低的栓塞率和 EFD 负荷相关,尤其是在低回声和长斑块患者以及术前存在无症状性缺血性脑病变的患者中。

相似文献

1
Impact of Carotid Stent Design on Embolic Filter Debris Load During Carotid Artery Stenting.颈动脉支架设计对颈动脉支架置入术中滤器栓塞碎片负荷的影响。
Stroke. 2023 Oct;54(10):2534-2541. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.043117. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
2
Quantitative analysis and predictors of embolic filter debris load during carotid artery stenting in asymptomatic patients.无症状患者颈动脉支架置入术中滤器栓塞物负荷的定量分析及预测因素。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Jul;68(1):109-117. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.09.055. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
3
Association between plaque echogenicity and embolic material captured in filter during protected carotid angioplasty and stenting.在颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术的保护下,斑块回声强度与滤网中捕获的栓子物质之间的相关性。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012 Jun;43(6):627-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.03.004. Epub 2012 Apr 8.
4
Plaque morphology effect on periprocedural asymptomatic cerebral embolism in carotid artery stenting using first-generation carotid stents: A diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging study.第一代颈动脉支架置入术治疗颈动脉狭窄中斑块形态对围手术期无症状性脑栓塞的影响:一项弥散加权磁共振成像研究。
Kardiol Pol. 2022;80(3):307-314. doi: 10.33963/KP.a2022.0014. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
5
Influence of stent design and use of protection devices on outcome of carotid artery stenting: a pooled analysis of individual patient data.支架设计和保护装置的使用对颈动脉支架置入术结果的影响:一项个体化患者数据分析的汇总分析。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2018 Dec;10(12):1149-1154. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013622. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
6
A Microscopic and Biomarker Evaluation of Embolic Filter Debris Collected During Carotid Artery Stenting.颈动脉支架置入术中收集的栓塞滤器碎片的显微镜检查和生物标志物评估
J Endovasc Ther. 2016 Apr;23(2):275-84. doi: 10.1177/1526602816628284. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
7
Is it possible to prevent cerebral embolization by improving the design and technology of carotid stent implantation?通过改进颈动脉支架置入术的设计和技术是否可以预防脑栓塞?
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2020 Dec;18(12):891-904. doi: 10.1080/14779072.2020.1833718. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
8
Results of carotid artery stenting with distal embolic protection with improved systems: Protected Carotid Artery Stenting in Patients at High Risk for Carotid Endarterectomy (PROTECT) trial.采用改良系统的颈动脉支架置入术治疗伴有远端栓塞保护装置的结果:高危颈动脉内膜切除术患者颈动脉支架置入术保护(PROTECT)试验。
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Apr;55(4):968-976.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.10.120. Epub 2012 Jan 9.
9
Randomized clinical trial of open-cell vs closed-cell stents for carotid stenting and effects of stent design on cerebral embolization.随机临床试验:开环支架与闭环支架在颈动脉支架置入术中的应用比较,以及支架设计对脑栓塞的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Nov;54(5):1310-1316.e1; discussion 1316. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.05.013. Epub 2011 Jul 1.
10
Double Filtration During Carotid Artery Stenting Using a Novel Post-Dilation Balloon With Integrated Embolic Protection.双重过滤颈动脉支架置入术:一种新型后置扩张球囊联合内置栓塞保护装置
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Feb 25;12(4):395-403. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.11.039.

引用本文的文献

1
30-Day Outcomes of Real-World Elective Carotid Stenosis Treatment Using a Dual-Layer Micromesh Stent (ROADSAVER Study).使用双层微网支架进行现实世界中择期颈动脉狭窄治疗的30天结果(ROADSAVER研究)
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2025 Apr;48(4):427-437. doi: 10.1007/s00270-025-04003-z. Epub 2025 Mar 19.
2
Intraprocedural and Delayed Plaque Protrusion in Carotid Artery Stenting Using a Dual-Layer Metallic Stent.使用双层金属支架进行颈动脉支架置入术中及术后延迟性斑块突出
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2024 Oct 29;3(11):102285. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102285. eCollection 2024 Nov.