Dokur Derya, Keskin Seda
Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Koc University, Rumelifeneri Yolu, Sariyer, 34450 Istanbul, Turkey.
Ind Eng Chem Res. 2018 Feb 14;57(6):2298-2309. doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.7b04792. Epub 2018 Jan 18.
Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have been considered as highly promising materials for adsorption-based CO separations. The number of synthesized MOFs has been increasing very rapidly. High-throughput molecular simulations are very useful to screen large numbers of MOFs in order to identify the most promising adsorbents prior to extensive experimental studies. Results of molecular simulations depend on the force field used to define the interactions between gas molecules and MOFs. Choosing the appropriate force field for MOFs is essential to make reliable predictions about the materials' performance. In this work, we performed two sets of molecular simulations using the two widely used generic force fields, Dreiding and UFF, and obtained adsorption data of CO/H, CO/N, and CO/CH mixtures in 100 different MOF structures. Using this adsorption data, several adsorbent evaluation metrics including selectivity, working capacity, sorbent selection parameter, and percent regenerability were computed for each MOF. MOFs were then ranked based on these evaluation metrics, and top performing materials were identified. We then examined the sensitivity of the MOF rankings to the force field type. Our results showed that although there are significant quantitative differences between some adsorbent evaluation metrics computed using different force fields, rankings of the top MOF adsorbents for CO separations are generally similar: 8, 8, and 9 out of the top 10 most selective MOFs were found to be identical in the ranking for CO/H, CO/N, and CO/CH separations using Dreiding and UFF. We finally suggested a force field factor depending on the energy parameters of atoms present in the MOFs to quantify the robustness of the simulation results to the force field selection. This easily computable factor will be highly useful to determine whether the results are sensitive to the force field type or not prior to performing computationally demanding molecular simulations.
金属有机框架材料(MOFs)被认为是基于吸附的CO分离中极具前景的材料。合成的MOFs数量一直在迅速增加。高通量分子模拟对于筛选大量MOFs非常有用,以便在进行广泛的实验研究之前确定最有前景的吸附剂。分子模拟的结果取决于用于定义气体分子与MOFs之间相互作用的力场。为MOFs选择合适的力场对于可靠预测材料性能至关重要。在这项工作中,我们使用两种广泛使用的通用力场Dreiding和UFF进行了两组分子模拟,并获得了100种不同MOF结构中CO/H₂、CO/N₂和CO/CH₄混合物的吸附数据。利用这些吸附数据,为每个MOF计算了几个吸附剂评估指标,包括选择性、工作容量、吸附剂选择参数和可再生百分比。然后根据这些评估指标对MOFs进行排名,并确定性能最佳的材料。然后,我们研究了MOF排名对力场类型的敏感性。我们的结果表明,尽管使用不同力场计算的一些吸附剂评估指标之间存在显著的定量差异,但用于CO分离的顶级MOF吸附剂的排名通常相似:在使用Dreiding和UFF进行的CO/H₂、CO/N₂和CO/CH₄分离排名中,前10种最具选择性的MOFs中有8种、8种和9种是相同的。我们最终提出了一个取决于MOFs中存在的原子能量参数的力场因子,以量化模拟结果对力场选择的稳健性。这个易于计算的因子在进行计算要求较高的分子模拟之前,对于确定结果是否对力场类型敏感将非常有用。