School of Kinesiology, Auburn University, 301 Wire Road, AL 36849, USA; CAPES Foundation, Ministry of Education of Brazil, Brasilia, DF 70040-020, Brazil.
Department of Health, Kinesiology, and Recreation, University of Utah, USA; Department of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, University of Utah, USA.
Int J Psychophysiol. 2018 May;127:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2018.02.013. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
Recent evidence suggests practicing a motor skill with the expectation of teaching it enhances learning by increasing information processing during motor preparation. However, the specific motor preparatory processes remain unknown. The present study sought to address this shortcoming by employing EEG to assess participants' motor preparatory processes while they completed a golf putting pretest, and then practiced putting with the expectation of (a) teaching another participant how to putt the next day (teach group, n = 30), or (b) being tested on their putting the next day (test group, n = 30). Participants' EEG during the 3-s prior to and 1-s after initiating putter movement was analyzed. All participants completed posttests 1 day after the practice session. The teach group exhibited better posttest performance (superior learning) relative to the test group, but no group differences in motor preparatory processing (EEG) emerged. However, participants in both groups exhibited linear decreases in both theta power at frontal midline and upper-alpha power over motor areas during putt initiation. These results suggest a decrease in working memory and action monitoring (frontal midline theta), and an increase in motor programming (motor upper-alpha) during putt initiation. Further, participants in both groups exhibited increased frontal midline theta from pretest to practice, but decreases in both upper motor-alpha and upper-alpha coherence between left/right temporal and motor planning regions. These results suggest participants utilized working memory and action monitoring to a greater extent during practice relative to pretest, while refining their motor programming and verbal-analytic/visuospatial involvement in motor programming.
最近的证据表明,在进行一项运动技能练习时,预期教授该技能会增加运动准备过程中的信息处理,从而增强学习效果。然而,具体的运动预备过程仍不清楚。本研究试图通过使用 EEG 来评估参与者在完成高尔夫推杆预测试时的运动预备过程,并在练习推杆时期望(a)第二天教另一个参与者如何推杆(教学组,n=30),或者(b)第二天接受推杆测试(测试组,n=30),来解决这一不足。在启动推杆运动前 3 秒和后 1 秒期间分析参与者的 EEG。所有参与者在练习课后 1 天完成后测试。与测试组相比,教学组在后测中表现出更好的表现(卓越学习),但在运动预备处理(EEG)方面没有组间差异。然而,两组参与者在推杆启动过程中,额中线的θ功率和运动区域的上α功率都呈线性下降。这些结果表明,在推杆启动过程中,工作记忆和动作监控(额中线θ)减少,运动编程(运动上α)增加。此外,两组参与者在预测试到练习过程中,额中线θ增加,但运动上α和左右颞部与运动计划区域之间的上α相干性降低。这些结果表明,参与者在练习过程中比在预测试中更广泛地利用工作记忆和动作监控,同时细化他们的运动编程和言语分析/空间运动编程参与。