• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床医生根据其对乳腺癌风险因素重要性的认知使用乳腺癌风险评估工具:一项国际调查。

Clinicians' use of breast cancer risk assessment tools according to their perceived importance of breast cancer risk factors: an international survey.

作者信息

Brédart Anne, Kop Jean-Luc, Antoniou Antonis C, Cunningham Alex P, De Pauw Antoine, Tischkowitz Marc, Ehrencrona Hans, Schmidt Marjanka K, Dolbeault Sylvie, Rhiem Kerstin, Easton Douglas F, Devilee Peter, Stoppa-Lyonnet Dominique, Schmutlzer Rita

机构信息

Institut Curie, Supportive Care Department, Psycho-Oncology Unit, 26 rue d'Ulm, 75005 Cedex 05, Paris, France.

University Paris Descartes, 71 avenue Edouard Vaillant, 92774, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.

出版信息

J Community Genet. 2019 Jan;10(1):61-71. doi: 10.1007/s12687-018-0362-8. Epub 2018 Mar 5.

DOI:10.1007/s12687-018-0362-8
PMID:29508368
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6325038/
Abstract

The BOADICEA breast cancer (BC) risk assessment model and its associated Web Application v3 (BWA) tool are being extended to incorporate additional genetic and non-genetic BC risk factors. From an online survey through the BOADICEA website and UK, Dutch, French and Swedish national genetic societies, we explored the relationships between the usage frequencies of the BWA and six other common BC risk assessment tools and respondents' perceived importance of BC risk factors. Respondents (N = 443) varied in age, country and clinical seniority but comprised mainly genetics health professionals (82%) and BWA users (93%). Oncology professionals perceived reproductive, hormonal (exogenous) and lifestyle BC risk factors as more important in BC risk assessment compared to genetics professionals (p values < 0.05 to 0.0001). BWA was used more frequently by respondents who gave high weight to breast tumour pathology and low weight to personal BC history as BC risk factors. BWA use was positively related to the weight given to hormonal BC risk factors. The importance attributed to lifestyle and BMI BC risk factors was not associated with the use of BWA or any of the other tools. Next version of the BWA encompassing additional BC risk factors will facilitate more comprehensive BC risk assessment in genetics and oncology practice.

摘要

博阿迪西亚乳腺癌(BC)风险评估模型及其相关的网络应用程序v3(BWA)工具正在扩展,以纳入更多的遗传和非遗传BC风险因素。通过博阿迪西亚网站以及英国、荷兰、法国和瑞典的国家遗传学会进行的在线调查,我们探讨了BWA与其他六种常见BC风险评估工具的使用频率之间的关系,以及受访者对BC风险因素的感知重要性。受访者(N = 443)在年龄、国家和临床资历方面各不相同,但主要由遗传学健康专业人员(82%)和BWA用户(93%)组成。与遗传学专业人员相比,肿瘤学专业人员认为生殖、激素(外源性)和生活方式BC风险因素在BC风险评估中更为重要(p值<0.05至0.0001)。那些将乳腺肿瘤病理学视为高权重BC风险因素、将个人BC病史视为低权重BC风险因素的受访者更频繁地使用BWA。BWA的使用与赋予激素BC风险因素的权重呈正相关。赋予生活方式和BMI BC风险因素的重要性与BWA或任何其他工具的使用无关。包含更多BC风险因素的BWA下一版本将有助于在遗传学和肿瘤学实践中进行更全面的BC风险评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a920/6325038/173b4bfbba7d/12687_2018_362_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a920/6325038/173b4bfbba7d/12687_2018_362_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a920/6325038/173b4bfbba7d/12687_2018_362_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinicians' use of breast cancer risk assessment tools according to their perceived importance of breast cancer risk factors: an international survey.临床医生根据其对乳腺癌风险因素重要性的认知使用乳腺癌风险评估工具:一项国际调查。
J Community Genet. 2019 Jan;10(1):61-71. doi: 10.1007/s12687-018-0362-8. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
2
Use of the BOADICEA Web Application in clinical practice: appraisals by clinicians from various countries.BOADICEA网络应用程序在临床实践中的应用:各国临床医生的评估
Fam Cancer. 2018 Jan;17(1):31-41. doi: 10.1007/s10689-017-0014-x.
3
BOADICEA: a comprehensive breast cancer risk prediction model incorporating genetic and nongenetic risk factors.BOADICEA:一种综合乳腺癌风险预测模型,纳入了遗传和非遗传风险因素。
Genet Med. 2019 Aug;21(8):1708-1718. doi: 10.1038/s41436-018-0406-9. Epub 2019 Jan 15.
4
Clinical applicability of the Polygenic Risk Score for breast cancer risk prediction in familial cases.多基因风险评分在家族性乳腺癌风险预测中的临床适用性
J Med Genet. 2023 Apr;60(4):327-336. doi: 10.1136/jmg-2022-108502. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
5
Validation of the BOADICEA model and a 313-variant polygenic risk score for breast cancer risk prediction in a Dutch prospective cohort.验证 BOADICEA 模型和一个包含 313 个变异的多基因风险评分在荷兰前瞻性队列中对乳腺癌风险预测的性能。
Genet Med. 2020 Nov;22(11):1803-1811. doi: 10.1038/s41436-020-0884-4. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
6
10-year performance of four models of breast cancer risk: a validation study.四种乳腺癌风险模型的 10 年表现:一项验证研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Apr;20(4):504-517. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30902-1. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
7
Incorporating truncating variants in PALB2, CHEK2, and ATM into the BOADICEA breast cancer risk model.将PALB2、CHEK2和ATM中的截短变异纳入BOADICEA乳腺癌风险模型。
Genet Med. 2016 Dec;18(12):1190-1198. doi: 10.1038/gim.2016.31. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
8
Assessment of breast cancer risk perception, knowledge, and breast self-examination practices among market women in Owo, Ondo State, Nigeria.尼日利亚翁多州奥沃市场女性乳腺癌风险感知、知识和乳房自我检查行为评估。
BMC Womens Health. 2023 Oct 27;23(1):556. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02711-7.
9
Alcohol consumption, cigarette smoking, and familial breast cancer risk: findings from the Prospective Family Study Cohort (ProF-SC).饮酒、吸烟与家族性乳腺癌风险:前瞻性家族研究队列(ProF-SC)的研究结果。
Breast Cancer Res. 2019 Nov 28;21(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s13058-019-1213-1.
10
Association of Nongenetic Factors With Breast Cancer Risk in Genetically Predisposed Groups of Women in the UK Biobank Cohort.英国生物库队列中遗传易感性女性群体中非遗传因素与乳腺癌风险的相关性研究。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Apr 1;3(4):e203760. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3760.

引用本文的文献

1
Prediction of Breast Cancer using Machine Learning Approaches.使用机器学习方法预测乳腺癌。
J Biomed Phys Eng. 2022 Jun 1;12(3):297-308. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2109-1403. eCollection 2022 Jun.
2
Survey on Physicians' Knowledge and Training Needs in Genetic Counseling in Germany.德国医生在遗传咨询方面的知识与培训需求调查。
Breast Care (Basel). 2021 Aug;16(4):389-395. doi: 10.1159/000511136. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
3
Leveraging Health Information Technology to Collect Family Cancer History: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Use of the BOADICEA Web Application in clinical practice: appraisals by clinicians from various countries.BOADICEA网络应用程序在临床实践中的应用:各国临床医生的评估
Fam Cancer. 2018 Jan;17(1):31-41. doi: 10.1007/s10689-017-0014-x.
2
Breast cancer risk models: a comprehensive overview of existing models, validation, and clinical applications.乳腺癌风险模型:现有模型的全面概述、验证及临床应用。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Jul;164(2):263-284. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4247-z. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
3
Decision making for breast cancer prevention among women at elevated risk.
利用健康信息技术收集家族癌症病史:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2021 Jun;5:775-788. doi: 10.1200/CCI.21.00004.
4
Patterns and Determinants of Attitudes towards Genetic Risk of Cancer: Case Study in a Malaysian Public University.癌症遗传风险态度的模式和决定因素:马来西亚一所公立大学的案例研究。
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Jul 19;2018:4682431. doi: 10.1155/2018/4682431. eCollection 2018.
乳腺癌高危女性的预防决策
Breast Cancer Res. 2017 Mar 24;19(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s13058-017-0826-5.
4
Impact of a Panel of 88 Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms on the Risk of Breast Cancer in High-Risk Women: Results From Two Randomized Tamoxifen Prevention Trials.88个单核苷酸多态性对高危女性患乳腺癌风险的影响:两项他莫昔芬预防随机试验的结果
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Mar;35(7):743-750. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.69.8944. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
5
Incorporating truncating variants in PALB2, CHEK2, and ATM into the BOADICEA breast cancer risk model.将PALB2、CHEK2和ATM中的截短变异纳入BOADICEA乳腺癌风险模型。
Genet Med. 2016 Dec;18(12):1190-1198. doi: 10.1038/gim.2016.31. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
6
Refining Breast Cancer Risk Stratification: Additional Genes, Additional Information.优化乳腺癌风险分层:更多基因,更多信息。
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2016;35:44-56. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_158817.
7
Mammographic density adds accuracy to both the Tyrer-Cuzick and Gail breast cancer risk models in a prospective UK screening cohort.在英国一个前瞻性筛查队列中,乳腺X线密度提高了泰勒-库齐克模型和盖尔乳腺癌风险模型的准确性。
Breast Cancer Res. 2015 Dec 1;17(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s13058-015-0653-5.
8
International Variation in Female Breast Cancer Incidence and Mortality Rates.女性乳腺癌发病率和死亡率的国际差异。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015 Oct;24(10):1495-506. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0535. Epub 2015 Sep 10.
9
The knowledge value-chain of genetic counseling for breast cancer: an empirical assessment of prediction and communication processes.乳腺癌遗传咨询的知识价值链:预测与沟通流程的实证评估
Fam Cancer. 2016 Jan;15(1):1-17. doi: 10.1007/s10689-015-9835-7.
10
Gene-panel sequencing and the prediction of breast-cancer risk.基因panel测序与乳腺癌风险预测
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 4;372(23):2243-57. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr1501341. Epub 2015 May 27.