University of Tennessee College of Medicine, Chattanooga TN.
Department of Critical Care Medicine, and Clinical and Translational Science, Center for Critical Care Nephrology, CRISMA, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.
Crit Care Med. 2018 Jun;46(6):949-957. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003092.
OBJECTIVE: Acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy in severe vasodilatory shock is associated with an unfavorable prognosis. Angiotensin II treatment may help these patients by potentially restoring renal function without decreasing intrarenal oxygenation. We analyzed the impact of angiotensin II on the outcomes of acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy. DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of the Angiotensin II for the Treatment of High-Output Shock 3 trial. SETTING: ICUs. PATIENTS: Patients with acute kidney injury treated with renal replacement therapy at initiation of angiotensin II or placebo (n = 45 and n = 60, respectively). INTERVENTIONS: IV angiotensin II or placebo. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Primary end point: survival through day 28; secondary outcomes included renal recovery through day 7 and increase in mean arterial pressure from baseline of ≥ 10 mm Hg or increase to ≥ 75 mm Hg at hour 3. Survival rates through day 28 were 53% (95% CI, 38%-67%) and 30% (95% CI, 19%-41%) in patients treated with angiotensin II and placebo (p = 0.012), respectively. By day 7, 38% (95% CI, 25%-54%) of angiotensin II patients discontinued RRT versus 15% (95% CI, 8%-27%) placebo (p = 0.007). Mean arterial pressure response was achieved in 53% (95% CI, 38%-68%) and 22% (95% CI, 12%-34%) of patients treated with angiotensin II and placebo (p = 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy at study drug initiation, 28-day survival and mean arterial pressure response were higher, and rate of renal replacement therapy liberation was greater in the angiotensin II group versus the placebo group. These findings suggest that patients with vasodilatory shock and acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy may preferentially benefit from angiotensin II.
目的:严重血管扩张性休克需要肾脏替代治疗的急性肾损伤与预后不良相关。血管紧张素 II 治疗可能通过潜在地恢复肾功能而不降低肾内氧合来帮助这些患者。我们分析了血管紧张素 II 对需要肾脏替代治疗的急性肾损伤的结局的影响。
设计:血管紧张素 II 治疗高输出休克 3 试验的事后分析。
设置:ICU。
患者:在开始血管紧张素 II 或安慰剂治疗时接受肾脏替代治疗的急性肾损伤患者(分别为 45 名和 60 名患者)。
干预措施:静脉内血管紧张素 II 或安慰剂。
测量和主要结果:主要终点:第 28 天的生存;次要结局包括第 7 天的肾功能恢复和从基线增加≥10mmHg的平均动脉压或在第 3 小时增加至≥75mmHg。在接受血管紧张素 II 和安慰剂治疗的患者中,第 28 天的生存率分别为 53%(95%CI,38%-67%)和 30%(95%CI,19%-41%)(p=0.012)。在第 7 天,血管紧张素 II 组中有 38%(95%CI,25%-54%)的患者停止接受 RRT,而安慰剂组中有 15%(95%CI,8%-27%)(p=0.007)。血管紧张素 II 组和安慰剂组分别有 53%(95%CI,38%-68%)和 22%(95%CI,12%-34%)的患者达到平均动脉压反应(p=0.001)。
结论:在开始研究药物治疗时需要肾脏替代治疗的急性肾损伤患者中,血管紧张素 II 组的 28 天生存率和平均动脉压反应更高,且肾脏替代治疗释放率更高。这些发现表明,血管扩张性休克和需要肾脏替代治疗的急性肾损伤患者可能更受益于血管紧张素 II。
N Engl J Med. 2017-5-21
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2019-1-16
Ann Intensive Care. 2025-8-8
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025-9
JAMA Netw Open. 2025-5-1
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2025-4-24
Kidney Int Rep. 2017-6-28
N Engl J Med. 2017-5-21
Crit Care. 2016-5-27