Suppr超能文献

社区促进老年人身体活动的准备情况——农村和城市社区的横断面比较。

Community Readiness for the Promotion of Physical Activity in Older Adults-A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Rural and Urban Communities.

机构信息

Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, Achterstr. 30, 28359 Bremen, Germany.

Research Focus Health Sciences Bremen, University of Bremen, 28359 Bremen, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Mar 6;15(3):453. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15030453.

Abstract

Communities can play an important role in delivering public health programs to older adults, but they differ in the provision of local structures and resources. The community readiness (CR) approach applies a stage model of change to the community level and analyzes structures and the degree of willingness to take action on a health issue. This study compared the CR regarding the promotion of physical activity as part of healthy ageing for older adults among urban and rural communities in North-West Germany. A cross-sectional CR assessment with key respondents in 23 municipalities (11 urban and 12 rural communities) was conducted using a semi-structured interview. Interviews were scored across the five CR dimensions and global CR score was calculated (scores between 1 = no awareness and 9 = professionalization). Wilcoxon rank-sum test and hierarchical regression models were used to compare urban and rural communities. In total, 118 interviews were conducted (response rate 69.8%). On average, the communities showed moderate CR scores (4.9 ± 0.3; Range: 4.3-5.4; preplanning or preparation phase). The global CR score was slightly higher in rural than in urban communities (regression coefficient = 0.29, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.02-0.59). The rural communities showed significantly higher CR scores in the 'Knowledge of efforts' dimension (0.70, 95% CI: 0.26-1.14) and in the 'Knowledge of the issue' (0.37, 95% CI: 0.04-0.70). Rural communities display a slightly higher CR level than urban communities. In the next step, targeted capacity building activities will be initiated among communities with low CR levels.

摘要

社区可以在为老年人提供公共卫生项目方面发挥重要作用,但它们在提供当地结构和资源方面存在差异。社区准备度(CR)方法将变革的阶段模型应用于社区层面,并分析结构和对健康问题采取行动的意愿程度。本研究比较了德国西北部城乡社区在促进老年人身体活动作为健康老龄化一部分方面的 CR。使用半结构化访谈对 23 个城市(11 个城市和 12 个农村社区)的关键受访者进行了横断面 CR 评估。访谈在五个 CR 维度上进行评分,并计算了总体 CR 评分(分数范围为 1 = 无意识至 9 = 专业化)。使用 Wilcoxon 秩和检验和层次回归模型比较了城乡社区。总共进行了 118 次访谈(回应率 69.8%)。平均而言,社区表现出中等 CR 得分(4.9±0.3;范围:4.3-5.4;规划或准备阶段)。农村社区的总体 CR 得分略高于城市社区(回归系数=0.29,95%置信区间(CI):-0.02-0.59)。农村社区在“努力知识”维度(0.70,95%CI:0.26-1.14)和“问题知识”(0.37,95%CI:0.04-0.70)方面的 CR 得分明显更高。农村社区的 CR 水平略高于城市社区。下一步,将在 CR 水平较低的社区中开展有针对性的能力建设活动。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f94/5876998/c17c8f885d46/ijerph-15-00453-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验