NeuroEngineering Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
NeuroEngineering Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Faculty of Science, Engineering and Technology, Swinburne University of Technology, Australia.
Neural Netw. 2018 Jun;102:10-20. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2018.02.008. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
The end-points of a moving bar (intrinsic terminators) contain unambiguous information that can be used to extract the bar's correct direction of motion, regardless of the orientation of the bar. However, extrinsic terminators, formed at the intersection of two overlapping bars, can result in motion signals with conflicting directions compared to those of the intrinsic terminators. Using a computational model, we propose that interactions between form and motion information may assist neurons in the motion-specific regions of primate cortex to differentiate intrinsic from extrinsic terminators. The motion processing model has two stages. The first stage is a model of V1 complex neurons, including end-stopped neurons. The resulting first stage motion signals are transmitted to the second stage, which is a model of MT neurons. In the proposed model, MT neurons additionally receive form information from neurons in V1 that are not orientation or direction selective but respond strongly to the contrast of the stimulus. These neurons have polarity-dependent center-surround receptive fields, as found in layer 4 of V1 in primates. As the inhibitory surrounds of these neurons are less activated at the intrinsic terminators, the signals generated by the end-points of the objects are stronger than the signals from the extrinsic terminators, which are inhibited by strong suppression from the surround. Therefore, the excitatory inputs received by integration MT neurons from center-surround V1 neurons enhance the unambiguous motion signals at the intrinsic terminators, which therefore dominate over the local motion signals generated at X-junctions. The results show that, despite the inability of V1 end-stopped neurons to distinguish between the two different types of terminators, center-surround V1 neurons provide the capacity for the second stage of the model to preferentially respond to the intrinsic terminators and, therefore, predict the true directions of the crossing bars.
移动棒的端点(内在终止器)包含明确的信息,可用于提取棒的正确运动方向,而与棒的方向无关。然而,在两个重叠棒的交点处形成的外在终止器会导致运动信号的方向与内在终止器的方向冲突。我们使用计算模型提出,形态和运动信息之间的相互作用可能有助于灵长类皮层运动特定区域的神经元区分内在和外在终止器。运动处理模型有两个阶段。第一阶段是 V1 复杂神经元的模型,包括端止神经元。由此产生的第一阶段运动信号被传输到第二阶段,即 MT 神经元的模型。在所提出的模型中,MT 神经元还从 V1 中的非方向或方向选择性但对刺激对比度强烈反应的神经元接收形态信息。这些神经元具有极性依赖性的中心-环绕感受野,如在灵长类动物的 V1 第 4 层中发现的那样。由于这些神经元的抑制性环绕在内在终止器处的激活较少,因此物体端点产生的信号比被环绕强烈抑制的外在终止器产生的信号更强。因此,来自中心-环绕 V1 神经元的整合 MT 神经元的兴奋性输入增强了内在终止器处的明确运动信号,因此主导了 X 交点处产生的局部运动信号。结果表明,尽管 V1 端止神经元无法区分两种不同类型的终止器,但中心-环绕 V1 神经元为模型的第二阶段提供了区分内在终止器和外在终止器的能力,从而预测交叉棒的真实方向。