• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国癌症联合委员会第 8 版肝胆管癌分期系统对肝门周围胆管癌的预后预测:与第 7 版相比,改善有限。

Prognostic Predictability of American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th Staging System for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Limited Improvement Compared with the 7th Staging System.

机构信息

Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jul;52(3):886-895. doi: 10.4143/crt.2020.023. Epub 2020 Mar 12.

DOI:10.4143/crt.2020.023
PMID:32164049
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7373861/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study was conducted to evaluate the prognostic values of the 7th and 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging systems for patients with resected perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 348 patients who underwent major hepatectomy for PHCC between 2008 and 2015 were identified from a single center. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared across stage groups with the log-rank test. The concordance index was used to evaluate the prognostic predictability of the 8th AJCC staging system compared with that of the 7th.

RESULTS

In the 8th edition, the stratification of each group of T classification improved compared to that in the 7th, as the survival rate of T4 decreased (T2, 31.2%; T3, 13.9%; T4, 15.1%; T1-T2, p=0.260; T2-T3, p=0.001; T3-T4, p=0.996). Both editions showed significant survival differences between each N category, except between N1 and N2 (p=0.063) in 7th edition. Differences of point estimates between the 8th and 7th T and N classification and overall stages were +0.028, +0.006, and +0.039, respectively (T, p=0.005; N, p=0.115; overall stage, p=0.005). In multivariable analysis, posthepatectomy liver failure, T category, N category, distant metastasis, histologic differentiation, intraoperative transfusion, and resection margin status were associated with OS.

CONCLUSION

The prognostic predictability of 8th AJCC staging for PHCC improved slightly, with statistical significance, compared to the 7th edition, but its overall performance is still unsatisfactory.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估第 7 版和第 8 版美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)分期系统对可切除肝门部胆管癌(PHCC)患者的预后价值。

材料和方法

从单一中心确定了 2008 年至 2015 年间接受 PHCC 根治性肝切除术的 348 例患者。采用 Kaplan-Meier 法估计总生存期(OS),并采用对数秩检验比较各分期组之间的 OS。采用一致性指数评估第 8 版 AJCC 分期系统与第 7 版相比的预后预测能力。

结果

在第 8 版中,与第 7 版相比,T 分类的每个组的分层得到了改善,因为 T4 患者的生存率降低(T2,31.2%;T3,13.9%;T4,15.1%;T1-T2,p=0.260;T2-T3,p=0.001;T3-T4,p=0.996)。两个版本在每个 N 类别之间均显示出显著的生存差异,除了第 7 版中 N1 和 N2 之间(p=0.063)。第 8 版和第 7 版 T 和 N 分类以及总分期之间的点估计差异分别为+0.028、+0.006 和+0.039(T,p=0.005;N,p=0.115;总分期,p=0.005)。多变量分析显示,术后肝衰竭、T 分类、N 分类、远处转移、组织学分化、术中输血和切缘状态与 OS 相关。

结论

与第 7 版相比,第 8 版 AJCC 分期对 PHCC 的预后预测能力略有改善,且具有统计学意义,但总体性能仍不理想。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e687/7373861/d33078a33e0a/crt-2020-023f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e687/7373861/aea7342e258b/crt-2020-023f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e687/7373861/b10e6411c830/crt-2020-023f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e687/7373861/d33078a33e0a/crt-2020-023f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e687/7373861/aea7342e258b/crt-2020-023f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e687/7373861/b10e6411c830/crt-2020-023f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e687/7373861/d33078a33e0a/crt-2020-023f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Prognostic Predictability of American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th Staging System for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Limited Improvement Compared with the 7th Staging System.美国癌症联合委员会第 8 版肝胆管癌分期系统对肝门周围胆管癌的预后预测:与第 7 版相比,改善有限。
Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jul;52(3):886-895. doi: 10.4143/crt.2020.023. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
2
Prognostic predictability of the new American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th staging system for distal bile duct cancer: limited usefulness compared with the 7th staging system.新的美国癌症联合委员会第 8 版远端胆管癌分期系统对预后的预测能力:与第 7 版分期系统相比,作用有限。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018 Feb;25(2):124-130. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.520. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
3
Comparison of the 7th and 8th editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Systems for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.比较第 7 版和第 8 版美国癌症联合委员会肝胆管癌分期系统。
Surgery. 2018 Aug;164(2):244-250. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.03.012. Epub 2018 May 24.
4
Evaluation of the New American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual 8th Edition for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.新版美国癌症联合委员会癌症分期手册第 8 版评估肝门周围胆管癌。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 Jul;24(7):1612-1618. doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04127-x. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
5
Survival analysis of patients with stage T2a and T2b perihilar cholangiocarcinoma treated with radical resection.T2a 和 T2b 肝门周围胆管癌根治性切除术后患者的生存分析。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Sep 3;20(1):849. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07357-4.
6
Comparative performances of the 7th and the 8th editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging systems for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.美国癌症联合委员会第7版和第8版肝内胆管癌分期系统的比较性能
J Surg Oncol. 2017 May;115(6):696-703. doi: 10.1002/jso.24569. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
7
American Joint Committee on Cancer staging for resected perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a comparison of the 6th and 7th editions.美国癌症联合委员会对切除的肝门周围胆管癌的分期:第6版与第7版的比较
HPB (Oxford). 2014 Dec;16(12):1074-82. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12320. Epub 2014 Sep 29.
8
Comparison of the seventh and eighth editions of the UICC/AJCC staging system for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: analysis of 1317 patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy at two centers.比较 UICC/AJCC 第七版和第八版鼻咽癌分期系统:两个中心 1317 例调强放疗患者的分析。
BMC Cancer. 2018 May 29;18(1):606. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4419-1.
9
Evaluation of the AJCC 8th Edition Staging System for Pathologically Versus Clinically Staged Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA): a Time to Revisit a Dogma? A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Analysis.美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)第8版肝内胆管癌(iCCA)病理分期与临床分期系统的评估:是时候重新审视一个教条了吗?一项监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)分析。
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2019 Sep;50(3):392-399. doi: 10.1007/s12029-018-0084-5.
10
Prognostic Relevance of the Eighth Edition of TNM Classification for Resected Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.第八版TNM分类对切除的肝门周围胆管癌的预后相关性
J Clin Med. 2020 Sep 29;9(10):3152. doi: 10.3390/jcm9103152.

引用本文的文献

1
The preoperative scoring system combining neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and CA19-9 predicts the long-term prognosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients undergoing curative liver resection.中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值与 CA19-9 联合术前评分系统预测行根治性肝切除术的肝内胆管细胞癌患者的长期预后。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Sep 5;24(1):1106. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12819-0.
2
Vascular invasion and lymph node metastasis mediate the effect of CA242 on prognosis in hilar cholangiocarcinoma patients after radical resection.血管侵犯和淋巴结转移介导了CA242对肝门部胆管癌患者根治性切除术后预后的影响。
Front Oncol. 2022 Dec 12;12:1071439. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1071439. eCollection 2022.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of the New American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual 8th Edition for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.新版美国癌症联合委员会癌症分期手册第 8 版评估肝门周围胆管癌。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 Jul;24(7):1612-1618. doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04127-x. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
2
Proposal for a new classification for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma based on tumour depth.基于肿瘤深度的肝门周围胆管癌新分类建议。
Br J Surg. 2019 Mar;106(4):427-435. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11063. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
3
Comparison of the 7th and 8th editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Systems for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.
Modification of the eighth AJCC/UICC staging system for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: An alternative pathological staging system from cholangiocarcinoma-prevalent Northeast Thailand.
肝门周围胆管癌第八版美国癌症联合委员会/国际抗癌联盟分期系统的修订:来自泰国东北部胆管癌高发地区的一种替代性病理分期系统。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Sep 30;9:893252. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.893252. eCollection 2022.
4
Impact of Positive Lymph Nodes and Resection Margin Status on the Overall Survival of Patients with Resected Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: The ENSCCA Registry.阳性淋巴结和切缘状态对切除的肝门部胆管癌患者总生存的影响:ENSCCA注册研究
Cancers (Basel). 2022 May 12;14(10):2389. doi: 10.3390/cancers14102389.
5
Evaluation of Four Lymph Node Classifications for the Prediction of Survival in Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma.四种淋巴结分类方法对肝门部胆管癌生存预测的评估。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 May;26(5):1030-1040. doi: 10.1007/s11605-021-05211-x. Epub 2022 Jan 1.
6
A Novel Nomogram Based on Log Odds of Metastatic Lymph Nodes to Predict Overall Survival in Patients With Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma After Surgery.一种基于转移性淋巴结对数比值的新型列线图,用于预测肝门部胆管癌患者术后的总生存期。
Front Oncol. 2021 Jul 22;11:649699. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.649699. eCollection 2021.
7
A novel risk-scoring system conducing to chemotherapy decision for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after pancreatectomy.一种有助于胰十二指肠切除术后胰腺导管腺癌患者化疗决策的新型风险评分系统。
J Cancer. 2021 May 27;12(14):4433-4442. doi: 10.7150/jca.57768. eCollection 2021.
8
External validation study of the 8 edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a single-center experience in China and proposal for simplification.美国癌症联合委员会第8版肝门部胆管癌分期系统的外部验证研究:中国单中心经验及简化建议
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2021 Apr;12(2):806-818. doi: 10.21037/jgo-20-348.
9
Extranodal Extension as an Independent Prognostic factor in Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients.喉鳞状细胞癌患者的结外扩展作为独立预后因素
J Cancer. 2020 Oct 18;11(24):7196-7201. doi: 10.7150/jca.47700. eCollection 2020.
10
Prognostic Relevance of the Eighth Edition of TNM Classification for Resected Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.第八版TNM分类对切除的肝门周围胆管癌的预后相关性
J Clin Med. 2020 Sep 29;9(10):3152. doi: 10.3390/jcm9103152.
比较第 7 版和第 8 版美国癌症联合委员会肝胆管癌分期系统。
Surgery. 2018 Aug;164(2):244-250. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.03.012. Epub 2018 May 24.
4
Proximal Resection Margins: More Prognostic than Distal Resection Margins in Patients Undergoing Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma Resection.近端切缘:在接受肝门部胆管癌切除术的患者中比远端切缘更具预后意义。
Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Oct;50(4):1106-1113. doi: 10.4143/crt.2017.320. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
5
8th Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: Pancreas and Hepatobiliary Cancers.《美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)癌症分期手册》第8版:胰腺癌和肝胆癌
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Apr;25(4):845-847. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-6025-x. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
6
What is the most accurate lymph node staging method for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma? Comparison of UICC/AJCC pN stage, number of metastatic lymph nodes, lymph node ratio, and log odds of metastatic lymph nodes.肝门周围胆管癌最准确的淋巴结分期方法是什么?UICC/AJCC pN分期、转移淋巴结数量、淋巴结比率及转移淋巴结对数几率的比较
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017 Apr;43(4):743-750. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.12.007. Epub 2017 Jan 8.
7
Association of Lymph Node Status With Survival in Patients After Liver Resection for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma in an Italian Multicenter Analysis.意大利多中心分析:肝门部胆管癌肝切除术后淋巴结状态与生存的关系。
JAMA Surg. 2016 Oct 1;151(10):916-922. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.1769.
8
Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Number of Nodes Examined and Optimal Lymph Node Prognostic Scheme.肝门部胆管癌:检查的淋巴结数量及最佳淋巴结预后方案
J Am Coll Surg. 2016 May;222(5):750-759.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
9
Pathologic Factors Associated with Prognosis after Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Stage II/III Microsatellite-Unstable Colorectal Cancers.II/III期微卫星不稳定型结直肠癌辅助化疗后与预后相关的病理因素
J Pathol Transl Med. 2015 Mar;49(2):118-28. doi: 10.4132/jptm.2015.02.05. Epub 2015 Mar 12.
10
Comparison of Number Versus Ratio of Positive Lymph Nodes in the Assessment of Lymph Node Status in Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.肝外胆管癌淋巴结状态评估中阳性淋巴结数量与比例的比较
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Jan;23(1):225-34. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4609-x. Epub 2015 May 21.