Suppr超能文献

使用两种不同的 EMS 担架系统的感知用力,来自瑞典的研究报告。

Perceived exertion using two different EMS stretcher systems, report from a Swedish study.

机构信息

Southern Älvsborg Emergency Medical Services, SE-501 90 Borås, Sweden.

Southern Älvsborg Emergency Medical Services, SE-501 90 Borås, Sweden; Department of Acute and Prehospital Care and Medical Technology, Prehospen - Center for Prehospital Research and the Prehospital Research Center of Western Sweden, University of Borås, SE-501 90 Borås, Sweden.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Jun;36(6):1040-1044. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.02.023. Epub 2018 Feb 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Emergency medical services (EMS) facilitate out of hospital care in a wide variety of settings on a daily basis. Stretcher-related adverse events and long term musculoskeletal injuries are commonly reported. Novel stretcher mechanisms may facilitate enhanced movement of patients and reduce workload for EMS personnel.

AIM

To describe EMS personnel's perceived exertion using two different stretcher systems.

METHODS

The methodology of this explorative simulation study included enrolling twenty (n=20) registered nurses and paramedics who worked in ten pairs (n=10) to transport a conscious, 165lb. (75kg) patient using two different EMS stretcher systems: the Pensi stretcher labeled A and the ALLFA stretcher labeled B. The ten pairs (n=10) were randomized to use either an A stretcher or a B stretcher with subsequent crossover. The pairs performed six identical tasks with each stretcher, including conveying stretchers from an ambulance up to the first floor of a building via a staircase, loading a patient on to the stretcher, and using the stretcher to transport the patient back to the ambulance. The subjective Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) survey (Borg scale) was used to measure perceived exertion at predefined intervals during transport.

RESULTS

No significant differences in workload were seen between stretcher groups A and B regarding unloading the stretcher (7.4 vs 8.2 p=0.3), transporting up a stairway (13.7 vs 12.5 p=0.06), lateral lift (12.1 vs 11.2 p=0.5), or flat ground transportation (10.4 vs 11.1 p=0.13). Pairs using stretcher A showed significantly less workload with regards to transporting down a stairway (11.0 vs 14.5 p<0.001) and loading into ambulance (11.1 vs 13.0 p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

A structured methodology may be used for testing the exertion levels experienced while using different stretcher systems. The use of supporting stretcher system mechanisms may reduce perceived exertion in EMS personnel mainly during transports down stairs and during loading into ambulance vehicles.

摘要

背景

急救医疗服务(EMS)在日常工作中在各种环境下提供院外护理。担架相关的不良事件和长期肌肉骨骼损伤经常被报道。新型担架机制可能有助于更轻松地移动患者,并减轻 EMS 人员的工作负荷。

目的

描述 EMS 人员使用两种不同担架系统时的感知用力情况。

方法

本探索性模拟研究的方法包括招募 20 名(n=20)注册护士和护理人员,他们分为 10 对(n=10),使用两种不同的 EMS 担架系统(标记为 A 的 Pensi 担架和标记为 B 的 ALLFA 担架)运送一名意识清醒、体重 165 磅(75 公斤)的患者。10 对(n=10)被随机分配使用 A 担架或 B 担架,然后进行交叉。每对使用每种担架完成六项相同的任务,包括通过楼梯将担架从救护车运送到建筑物的一楼、将患者装载到担架上,以及使用担架将患者送回救护车。使用主观感知用力量表(Borg 量表)在运输过程中的预定时间间隔测量感知用力。

结果

在卸载担架(7.4 对 8.2,p=0.3)、上楼梯运输(13.7 对 12.5,p=0.06)、侧举(12.1 对 11.2,p=0.5)或平地运输(10.4 对 11.1,p=0.13)方面,担架 A 和担架 B 两组之间的工作量没有显著差异。使用担架 A 的担架组在楼梯下降运输(11.0 对 14.5,p<0.001)和装入救护车(11.1 对 13.0,p<0.001)方面的工作量明显较小。

结论

可以使用结构化方法来测试使用不同担架系统时所经历的用力水平。使用支撑担架系统机制可能会降低 EMS 人员在搬运下楼和装入救护车车辆时的感知用力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验