1 Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
2 Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Jul;159(1):35-41. doi: 10.1177/0194599818763067. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
Objective To (1) compare physiologic changes during rigid bronchoscopy during spontaneous and mechanical ventilation and (2) evaluate the efficacy of a helium-oxygen (heliox) gas mixture as compared with room air during rigid bronchoscopy. Study Design Crossover animal study evaluating physiologic parameters during rigid bronchoscopy. Outcomes were compared with predicted computational fluid analysis. Setting Simulated ventilation via computational fluid dynamics analysis and term lambs undergoing rigid bronchoscopy. Methods Respiratory and physiologic outcomes were analyzed in a lamb model simulating bronchoscopy during foreign body aspiration to compare heliox with room air. The main outcome measures were blood oxygen saturation, heart rate, blood pressure, partial pressure of oxygen, and partial pressure of carbon dioxide. Computational fluid dynamics analysis was performed with SOLIDWORKS within a rigid pediatric bronchoscope during simulated ventilation comparing heliox with room air. Results For room air, lambs desaturated within 3 minutes during mechanical ventilation versus normal oxygen saturation during spontaneous ventilation ( P = .01). No improvement in respiratory outcomes was seen between heliox and room air during mechanical ventilation. Computational fluid dynamics analysis demonstrates increased turbulence within size 3.5 bronchoscopes when comparing heliox and room air. Meaningful comparisons could not be made due to the intolerance of the lambs to heliox in vivo. Conclusion During mechanical ventilation on room air, lambs desaturate more quickly during rigid bronchoscopy on settings that should be adequate. Heliox does not improve ventilation during rigid bronchoscopy.
(1) 比较机械通气和自主通气时硬质支气管镜检查期间的生理变化,(2) 评估氦-氧(氦氧)混合气与硬质支气管镜检查期间的空气相比的疗效。
比较生理参数的交叉动物研究在硬质支气管镜检查期间。结果与预测的计算流体分析进行了比较。
通过计算流体动力学分析模拟通气和进行硬质支气管镜检查的足月羔羊。
在模拟异物吸入期间的羔羊模型中分析呼吸和生理结果,以比较氦氧与空气。主要观察指标为血氧饱和度、心率、血压、氧分压和二氧化碳分压。通过 SOLIDWORKS 在模拟通气期间对刚性儿科支气管镜进行计算流体动力学分析,比较氦氧与空气。
对于空气,机械通气时的羔羊在 3 分钟内脱氧,而自主通气时的正常氧饱和度(P =.01)。机械通气时,与空气相比,氦氧在呼吸结果方面没有改善。计算流体动力学分析表明,在比较氦氧和空气时,3.5 号支气管镜内的湍流增加。由于体内羔羊对氦氧的不耐受,无法进行有意义的比较。
在空气的机械通气期间,硬质支气管镜检查期间的羔羊在设置应足够的情况下更快地脱氧。在硬质支气管镜检查期间,氦氧不能改善通气。