• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[倾向评分:兴趣、应用及局限性。临床医生实用指南]

[Propensity score: Interests, use and limitations. A practical guide for clinicians].

作者信息

Moulis G, Lapeyre-Mestre M

机构信息

Service de médecine interne, CHU de Toulouse, CHU Purpan, salle Le Tallec, pavillon URM, place du Dr-Baylac, TSA 40031, 31059 Toulouse cedex 9, France; UMR 1027 Inserm-université de Toulouse, faculté de Médecine, 37, allées Jules Guesde, 31000 Toulouse, France; CIC 1436, CHU de Toulouse, CHU Purpan, pavillon PPR, place du Dr-Baylac, TSA 4003, 31059 Toulouse cedex 9, France.

UMR 1027 Inserm-université de Toulouse, faculté de Médecine, 37, allées Jules Guesde, 31000 Toulouse, France; CIC 1436, CHU de Toulouse, CHU Purpan, pavillon PPR, place du Dr-Baylac, TSA 4003, 31059 Toulouse cedex 9, France; Service de pharmacologie médicale et clinique, CHU de Toulouse, Faculté de Médecine, 37, allées Jules Guesde, 31000 Toulouse, France.

出版信息

Rev Med Interne. 2018 Oct;39(10):805-812. doi: 10.1016/j.revmed.2018.02.012. Epub 2018 Mar 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.revmed.2018.02.012
PMID:29514739
Abstract

Propensity scores have been proposed in the early 1980s, and are increasingly used in epidemiology since the 2000s. They are is used to minimize the selection bias in observational studies, leading to a comparability between the exposure groups close to that observed in randomized trials. However, they have important limitations. Besides, new statistical techniques to improve the propensity score performances are more and more complex, while the build and the use of propensity score require a strict methodology to avoid bias, imprecision and non-reproducibility. This overview, designed for clinicians, is aimed at describing the advantages, techniques of use and limitations of propensity scores. A reading grid is provided in order to help interpreting studies using propensity scores.

摘要

倾向得分在20世纪80年代初被提出,自21世纪以来在流行病学中越来越多地被使用。它们用于最大限度地减少观察性研究中的选择偏倚,使暴露组之间的可比性接近随机试验中的观察结果。然而,它们有重要的局限性。此外,提高倾向得分性能的新统计技术越来越复杂,而倾向得分的构建和使用需要严格的方法来避免偏差、不精确性和不可重复性。本综述专为临床医生设计,旨在描述倾向得分的优点、使用技术和局限性。提供了一个阅读框架,以帮助解释使用倾向得分的研究。

相似文献

1
[Propensity score: Interests, use and limitations. A practical guide for clinicians].[倾向评分:兴趣、应用及局限性。临床医生实用指南]
Rev Med Interne. 2018 Oct;39(10):805-812. doi: 10.1016/j.revmed.2018.02.012. Epub 2018 Mar 4.
2
[Propensity score: A credible alternative to randomization?].[倾向评分:随机化的可靠替代方法?]
Bull Cancer. 2016 Jan;103(1):113-22. doi: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2015.10.012. Epub 2015 Dec 3.
3
Response to comments on 'the use of propensity scores and observational data to estimate randomized controlled trial generalizability bias'.对关于“使用倾向得分和观察性数据来估计随机对照试验的可推广性偏差”评论的回应。
Stat Med. 2014 Feb 10;33(3):538-9. doi: 10.1002/sim.6032.
4
Regulatory considerations in the design of comparative observational studies using propensity scores.使用倾向评分设计比较性观察性研究时的监管考量
J Biopharm Stat. 2012;22(6):1272-9. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2012.715111.
5
An overview of the objectives of and the approaches to propensity score analyses.倾向评分分析的目标和方法概述。
Eur Heart J. 2011 Jul;32(14):1704-8. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr031. Epub 2011 Feb 28.
6
Comments on 'the use of propensity scores and observational data to estimate randomized controlled trial generalizability bias' by Taylor R. Pressler and Eloise E. Kaizar, Statistics in Medicine 2013.对泰勒·R·普雷斯勒和埃洛伊斯·E·凯扎尔所著《利用倾向得分和观察性数据估计随机对照试验的可推广性偏差》的评论,发表于《医学统计学》2013年。
Stat Med. 2014 Feb 10;33(3):536-7. doi: 10.1002/sim.5929.
7
Propensity scores - A brief introduction for resuscitation researchers.倾向评分 - 复苏研究人员的简要介绍。
Resuscitation. 2018 Apr;125:66-69. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.02.003. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
8
Are propensity scores really superior to standard multivariable analysis?倾向评分是否真的优于标准多变量分析?
Contemp Clin Trials. 2011 Sep;32(5):731-40. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2011.05.006. Epub 2011 May 16.
9
Propensity Score Matching: The 'Devil is in the Details' Where More May Be Hidden than You Know.倾向评分匹配:“魔鬼在细节中”,你可能不知道隐藏着更多的东西。
Am J Med. 2020 Feb;133(2):178-181. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.08.055. Epub 2019 Oct 13.
10
Propensity score analysis with missing data.倾向评分分析与缺失数据。
Psychol Methods. 2016 Sep;21(3):427-45. doi: 10.1037/met0000076. Epub 2016 Mar 10.