Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
Faculty of Science, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Front Immunol. 2018 Feb 19;9:259. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00259. eCollection 2018.
Devil facial tumor disease (DFTD) is renowned for its successful evasion of the host immune system. Down regulation of the major histocompatabilty complex class I molecule (MHC-I) on the DFTD cells is a primary mechanism of immune escape. Immunization trials on captive Tasmanian devils have previously demonstrated that an immune response against DFTD can be induced, and that immune-mediated tumor regression can occur. However, these trials were limited by their small sample sizes. Here, we describe the results of two DFTD immunization trials on cohorts of devils prior to their wild release as part of the Tasmanian Government's Wild Devil Recovery project. 95% of the devils developed anti-DFTD antibody responses. Given the relatively large sample sizes of the trials ( = 19 and = 33), these responses are likely to reflect those of the general devil population. DFTD cells manipulated to express MHC-I were used as the antigenic basis of the immunizations in both trials. Although the adjuvant composition and number of immunizations differed between trials, similar anti-DFTD antibody levels were obtained. The first trial comprised DFTD cells and the adjuvant combination of ISCOMATRIX™, polyIC, and CpG with up to four immunizations given at monthly intervals. This compared to the second trial whereby two immunizations comprising DFTD cells and the adjuvant combination ISCOMATRIX™, polyICLC (Hiltonol) and imiquimod were given a month apart, providing a shorter and, therefore, more practical protocol. Both trials incorporated a booster immunization given up to 5 months after the primary course. A key finding was that devils in the second trial responded more quickly and maintained their antibody levels for longer compared to devils in the first trial. The different adjuvant combination incorporating the RNAase resistant polyICLC and imiquimod used in the second trial is likely to be responsible. The seroconversion in the majority of devils in these anti-DFTD immunization trials was remarkable, especially as DFTD is hallmarked by its immune evasion mechanisms. Microsatellite analyzes of MHC revealed that some MHC-I microsatellites correlated to stronger immune responses. These trials signify the first step in the long-term objective of releasing devils with immunity to DFTD into the wild.
恶魔面部肿瘤病(DFTD)以成功逃避宿主免疫系统而闻名。DFTD 细胞中主要组织相容性复合体 I 类分子(MHC-I)的下调是免疫逃避的主要机制。对圈养袋獾的免疫试验先前表明,可以诱导针对 DFTD 的免疫反应,并且可以发生免疫介导的肿瘤消退。然而,这些试验受到样本量小的限制。在这里,我们描述了在塔斯马尼亚政府的野生恶魔恢复项目之前,对即将野外释放的恶魔进行的两次 DFTD 免疫试验的结果。95%的恶魔产生了抗 DFTD 抗体反应。鉴于试验的样本量相对较大( = 19 和 = 33),这些反应可能反映了一般恶魔种群的反应。在这两项试验中,均使用表达 MHC-I 的 DFTD 细胞作为免疫接种的抗原基础。尽管试验之间的佐剂组成和免疫次数不同,但获得了相似的抗 DFTD 抗体水平。第一项试验包括 DFTD 细胞和 ISCOMATRIX™、polyIC 和 CpG 的佐剂组合,每月间隔进行四次免疫。这与第二项试验形成对比,第二项试验由 DFTD 细胞和佐剂组合 ISCOMATRIX™、polyICLC(Hiltonol)和咪喹莫特组成,每月间隔进行两次免疫,提供了更短且更实用的方案。这两项试验都在初次疗程后 5 个月内进行了加强免疫。一个关键发现是,与第一项试验相比,第二项试验中的恶魔反应更快,并且保持抗体水平的时间更长。第二项试验中使用的包含 RNAase 抗性 polyICLC 和咪喹莫特的不同佐剂组合可能是造成这种情况的原因。这些抗 DFTD 免疫试验中大多数恶魔的血清转化率令人瞩目,尤其是因为 DFTD 的特点是其免疫逃避机制。MHC 的微卫星分析表明,一些 MHC-I 微卫星与更强的免疫反应相关。这些试验标志着将具有 DFTD 免疫力的恶魔释放到野外的长期目标的第一步。