Center for Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019 Jan;26(1):25-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.02.018. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
To demonstrate techniques for addressing the unique challenges for a minimally invasive approach to hysterectomy presented by a massive myomatous uterus.
Technical video of an operation demonstrating the methods used to perform hysterectomy in this setting, highlighting such aspects as port placement (Fig. 1), uterine manipulation (Fig. 2), exposure, and vascular control (Figs. 3 and 4) (Canadian Task Force classification III).
Academic tertiary care hospital.
A 49-year-old woman elected to proceed with laparoscopic hysterectomy after years of suffering from bleeding and bulk symptoms from a massively enlarged myomatous uterus. A computed tomography scan estimated uterine dimensions of 32 × 27 × 24 cm, for a volume of >7000 mL (Fig. 5). Her surgical history included a ventral herniorrhaphy with mesh, and her body mass index was 43 kg/m. She was a Jehovah's Witness, and thus blood transfusion was not an acceptable option for her due to a religious prohibition. Intraoperatively, the uterus extended deep into the pararectal and paravesical spaces on the right, from the caudad below the cervix (Fig. 6) to superiorly near the liver edge (Fig. 7).
Laparoscopic hysterectomy was successfully completed (Table), and the patient was discharged on the day after surgery. Final pathology revealed a 6095-g uterus with benign leiomyomata. She presented 9 days after surgery with nausea and vomiting, suspicious for an incarcerated hernia at the tissue extraction site. Her symptoms were ultimately determined to be due to either ileus or small bowel obstruction, which likely could have been managed nonoperatively with bowel rest and fluids. She stayed an additional 2 days after readmission and was then discharged, with no further complications.
The size of the uterus was once considered a barrier to the use of laparoscopy for hysterectomy, but experience has shown that the benefits of minimally invasive surgery are particularly relevant for large myomas [1-4], given that a vaginal approach is not feasible and that other risks, such as wound complications and venous thromboembolism, would be greater with the large incision required to perform the procedure by laparotomy. This video uses a particularly challenging case to demonstrate a roadmap for addressing myomas in laparoscopic hysterectomy through exposure and vascular control. Although the presentation focused on the initial steps of the procedure and not on uterine extraction, this patient's readmission highlights potential complications associated with various methods of tissue removal for very large specimens.
展示针对巨大子宫肌瘤的微创子宫切除术所面临的独特挑战的解决技术。
手术技术视频,演示在这种情况下进行子宫切除术的方法,突出端口放置(图 1)、子宫操作(图 2)、暴露和血管控制(图 3 和 4)等方面(加拿大任务组分类 III)。
学术三级保健医院。
一名 49 岁妇女因巨大子宫肌瘤引起的出血和肿块症状多年来一直饱受困扰,选择进行腹腔镜子宫切除术。计算机断层扫描估计子宫尺寸为 32×27×24 厘米,体积>7000 毫升(图 5)。她的手术史包括网片腹疝修补术,她的体重指数为 43kg/m。她是一名耶和华见证人,由于宗教禁止,输血对她来说不是一个可接受的选择。术中,子宫在右侧深入直肠旁和膀胱旁间隙,从子宫颈下方的尾侧(图 6)到上方接近肝缘(图 7)。
成功完成腹腔镜子宫切除术(表),患者在手术后第二天出院。最终病理显示子宫重 6095 克,良性平滑肌瘤。她在手术后 9 天出现恶心和呕吐,怀疑是组织提取部位的嵌顿疝。她的症状最终被确定为肠梗阻或小肠梗阻,可能可以通过非手术治疗,如肠休息和补液来治疗。她在再次入院后又住了 2 天,然后出院,没有再出现并发症。
子宫大小曾经被认为是腹腔镜子宫切除术的障碍,但经验表明,微创手术的益处对于大肌瘤尤其相关[1-4],因为阴道入路不可行,而且如果通过剖腹手术进行手术,需要较大的切口,其他风险,如伤口并发症和静脉血栓栓塞,会更大。该视频使用一个特别具有挑战性的病例,展示了通过暴露和血管控制在腹腔镜子宫切除术中处理肌瘤的路线图。虽然演讲重点是手术的初始步骤,而不是子宫切除,但该患者的再次入院突出了与非常大标本的各种组织去除方法相关的潜在并发症。