• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Physicians' Perspectives Regarding Prescription Drug Monitoring Program Use Within the Department of Veterans Affairs: a Multi-State Qualitative Study.医生对退伍军人事务部处方药物监测计划使用的看法:一项多州定性研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Aug;33(8):1253-1259. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4374-1. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
2
Barriers to Utilization of Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs Among Prescribing Physicians and Advanced Practice Registered Nurses at Veterans Health Administration Facilities in Oregon.俄勒冈州退伍军人事务部医疗机构的开处方医生和高级执业注册护士在利用处方药物监测计划方面存在的障碍。
Pain Med. 2020 Apr 1;21(4):695-703. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz289.
3
Physician attitudes and experiences with Maryland's prescription drug monitoring program (PDMP).医生对马里兰州处方药监测计划(PDMP)的态度和经历。
Addiction. 2017 Feb;112(2):311-319. doi: 10.1111/add.13620. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
4
Associations between statewide prescription drug monitoring program (PDMP) requirement and physician patterns of prescribing opioid analgesics for patients with non-cancer chronic pain.州级处方药物监测计划(PDMP)要求与医生为非癌症慢性疼痛患者开具阿片类镇痛药处方模式之间的关联。
Addict Behav. 2018 Jan;76:348-354. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.08.032. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
5
Variations in prescription drug monitoring program use by prescriber specialty.不同专业医生对处方药物监测计划的使用情况存在差异。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2018 Nov;94:35-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2018.08.006. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
6
Factors Related to Prescription Drug Monitoring Program Queries for Veterans Receiving Long-Term Opioid Therapy.与接受长期阿片类药物治疗的退伍军人的处方药物监测计划查询相关的因素。
Pain Med. 2021 Jul 25;22(7):1548-1558. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnaa386.
7
Prescription drug monitoring program design and function: A qualitative analysis.处方药监测项目的设计与功能:一项定性分析
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017 Nov 1;180:395-400. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.08.040. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
8
Utilization of prescription drug monitoring programs for prescribing and dispensing decisions: Results from a multi-site qualitative study.利用处方药物监测计划进行处方和配药决策:一项多地点定性研究的结果。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2019 Jun;15(6):754-760. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.09.007. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
9
The prescription drug monitoring program in a multifactorial approach to the opioid crisis: PDMP data, Pennsylvania, 2016-2020.多因素方法应对阿片类药物危机中的处方药物监测计划:PDMP 数据,宾夕法尼亚州,2016-2020 年。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Apr 13;23(1):364. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09272-3.
10
Evaluating Emergency Department Opioid Prescribing Behaviors After Education About Mandated Use of the Pennsylvania Prescription Drug Monitoring Program.在接受关于强制使用宾夕法尼亚州处方药监测计划的教育后,评估急诊科阿片类药物的处方行为。
J Addict Nurs. 2018 Jul/Sep;29(3):196-202. doi: 10.1097/JAN.0000000000000236.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers and facilitators related to healthcare practitioner use of real time prescription monitoring tools in Australia.澳大利亚医疗保健从业者使用实时处方监测工具的障碍和促进因素。
Front Public Health. 2023 Sep 12;11:1175791. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1175791. eCollection 2023.
2
Opioid-related policy changes: Experiences and perspectives from people who use opioids to manage non-cancer chronic pain.阿片类药物相关政策变化:使用阿片类药物治疗非癌症慢性疼痛人群的经验和观点。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2023 Sep;42(6):1482-1492. doi: 10.1111/dar.13683. Epub 2023 May 30.
3
Characteristics of statewide prescription drug monitoring programs and potentially inappropriate opioid prescribing to patients with non-cancer chronic pain: A machine learning application.全州范围的处方药物监测计划的特点及潜在不合理的阿片类药物处方给非癌症慢性疼痛患者:机器学习的应用。
Prev Med. 2022 Aug;161:107116. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107116. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
4
"1,000 conversations I'd rather have than that one:" A qualitative study of prescriber experiences with opioids and the impact of a prescription drug monitoring program.“我宁愿有 1000 次这样的对话:”一项定性研究调查了处方者使用阿片类药物的经验以及处方药物监测计划的影响。
J Addict Dis. 2022 Oct-Dec;40(4):527-537. doi: 10.1080/10550887.2022.2035168. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
5
Effects of Implementation and Enforcement Differences in Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs in 3 States: Connecticut, Kentucky, and Wisconsin.康涅狄格州、肯塔基州和威斯康星州三个州处方药监测项目实施与执行差异的影响
Subst Abuse. 2021 Mar 25;15:1178221821992349. doi: 10.1177/1178221821992349. eCollection 2021.
6
Academic detailing increases prescription drug monitoring program use among primary care practices.学术细化提高了初级保健实践中药物监测计划的使用。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2021 Jul-Aug;61(4):418-424.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2021.02.019. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
7
Health Care Provider Utilization of Prescription Monitoring Programs: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.医疗保健提供者对处方监测计划的利用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pain Med. 2021 Jul 25;22(7):1570-1582. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnaa412.
8
Advances in prescription drug monitoring program research: a literature synthesis (June 2018 to December 2019).处方药物监测计划研究进展:文献综述(2018 年 6 月至 2019 年 12 月)。
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2020 Jul;33(4):326-333. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000608.
9
Primary care physicians' perspectives on Veterans who obtain prescription opioids from multiple healthcare systems.基层医疗医生对从多个医疗系统获取处方阿片类药物的退伍军人的看法。
J Opioid Manag. 2019 May/Jun;15(3):183-191. doi: 10.5055/jom.2019.0502.
10
Capsule Commentary on Radomski et al.'s Physicians' Perspectives Regarding Prescription Drug Monitoring Program Use Within the Department of Veterans Affairs: a Multi-state Qualitative Study.关于拉多姆斯基等人对退伍军人事务部内处方药监测计划使用的医生观点的简要评论:一项多州定性研究
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Aug;33(8):1381. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4515-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of Dual Use of Department of Veterans Affairs and Medicare Part D Drug Benefits on Potentially Unsafe Opioid Use.退伍军人事务部和医疗保险部分 D 药物福利的双重利用对潜在不安全阿片类药物使用的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2018 Feb;108(2):248-255. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.304174. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
2
Opioid dispensing and overlap in veterans with non-cancer pain eligible for Medicare Part D.符合医疗保险D部分条件的患有非癌性疼痛的退伍军人的阿片类药物配给与重叠情况。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2017 May-Jun;57(3):333-340.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2017.02.018. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
3
Addressing the Opioid Epidemic in the United States: Lessons From the Department of Veterans Affairs.应对美国的阿片类药物流行:来自退伍军人事务部的经验教训。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 May 1;177(5):611-612. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.0147.
4
Pharmacy Use in the First Year of the Veterans Choice Program: A Mixed-methods Evaluation.退伍军人选择计划第一年的药房使用情况:一项混合方法评估
Med Care. 2017 Jul;55 Suppl 7 Suppl 1:S26-S32. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000661.
5
Do more robust prescription drug monitoring programs reduce prescription opioid overdose?更强大的处方药物监测计划是否能减少处方类阿片类药物的过量使用?
Addiction. 2017 Oct;112(10):1773-1783. doi: 10.1111/add.13741. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
6
A qualitative analysis of prescribers' and dispensers' views on improving prescription drug monitoring programs.定性分析处方者和配药者对改进处方药物监测计划的看法。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2017 Nov;13(6):1167-1174. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2016.12.002. Epub 2016 Dec 12.
7
Overlapping buprenorphine, opioid, and benzodiazepine prescriptions among veterans dually enrolled in Department of Veterans Affairs and Medicare Part D.同时参加退伍军人事务部和医疗保险D部分的退伍军人中丁丙诺啡、阿片类药物和苯二氮卓类药物重叠处方情况。
Subst Abus. 2017 Jan-Mar;38(1):22-25. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2016.1267071. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
8
A survey of Physicians' Perspectives on the New York State Mandatory Prescription Monitoring Program (ISTOP).纽约州强制性处方监测计划(ISTOP)的医师观点调查。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2016 Nov;70:35-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2016.07.013. Epub 2016 Jul 29.
9
Physician attitudes and experiences with Maryland's prescription drug monitoring program (PDMP).医生对马里兰州处方药监测计划(PDMP)的态度和经历。
Addiction. 2017 Feb;112(2):311-319. doi: 10.1111/add.13620. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
10
Beyond the VA Crisis--Becoming a High-Performance Network.超越退伍军人事务部危机——成为一个高性能网络。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Mar 17;374(11):1003-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1600307.

医生对退伍军人事务部处方药物监测计划使用的看法:一项多州定性研究。

Physicians' Perspectives Regarding Prescription Drug Monitoring Program Use Within the Department of Veterans Affairs: a Multi-State Qualitative Study.

机构信息

Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Aug;33(8):1253-1259. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4374-1. Epub 2018 Mar 8.

DOI:10.1007/s11606-018-4374-1
PMID:29520747
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6082216/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has implemented robust strategies to monitor prescription opioid dispensing, but these strategies have not accounted for opioids prescribed by non-VA providers. State-based prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMPs) are a potential tool to identify VA patients' receipt of opioids from non-VA prescribers, and recent legislation requires their use within VA.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate VA physicians' perspectives and experiences regarding use of PDMPs to monitor Veterans' receipt of opioids from non-VA prescribers.

DESIGN

Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews.

PARTICIPANTS

Forty-two VA primary care physicians who prescribed opioids to 15 or more Veterans in 2015. We sampled physicians from two states with PDMPs (Massachusetts and Illinois) and one without prescriber access to a PDMP at the time of the interviews (Pennsylvania).

APPROACH

From February to August 2016, we conducted semi-structured telephone interviews that addressed the following topics regarding PDMPs: overall experiences, barriers to optimal use, and facilitators to improve use.

KEY RESULTS

VA physicians broadly supported use of PDMPs or desired access to one, while exhibiting varying patterns of PDMP use dictated by state laws and their clinical judgment. Physicians noted administrative burdens and incomplete or unavailable prescribing data as key barriers to PDMP use. To facilitate use, physicians endorsed (1) linking PDMPs with the VA electronic health record, (2) using templated notes to document PDMP use, and (3) delegating routine PDMP queries to ancillary staff.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the time and administrative burdens associated with their use, VA physicians in our study broadly supported PDMPs. The application of our findings to ongoing PDMP implementation efforts may strengthen PDMP use both within and outside VA and improve the safe prescribing of opioids.

摘要

背景

美国退伍军人事务部(VA)已经实施了强有力的策略来监测处方类阿片类药物的发放情况,但这些策略并未考虑到非 VA 提供商开出的阿片类药物。州级处方药物监测计划(PDMP)是一种潜在的工具,可以确定 VA 患者从非 VA 开处方者处获得阿片类药物的情况,最近的立法要求在 VA 内使用 PDMP。

目的

评估 VA 医生对使用 PDMP 来监测退伍军人从非 VA 开处方者处获得阿片类药物的看法和经验。

设计

使用半结构化访谈的定性研究。

参与者

42 名在 2015 年为 15 名或以上退伍军人开处阿片类药物的 VA 初级保健医生。我们从有 PDMP 的两个州(马萨诸塞州和伊利诺伊州)和一个在访谈时没有开处方者获取 PDMP 权限的州(宾夕法尼亚州)抽取医生。

方法

从 2016 年 2 月到 8 月,我们进行了半结构化电话访谈,这些访谈涉及 PDMP 的以下主题:总体经验、最佳使用的障碍以及改善使用的促进因素。

主要结果

VA 医生广泛支持使用 PDMP 或希望获得 PDMP,同时根据州法律和他们的临床判断,表现出不同的 PDMP 使用模式。医生指出行政负担和不完整或不可用的处方数据是 PDMP 使用的主要障碍。为了促进使用,医生们赞成(1)将 PDMP 与 VA 电子健康记录链接,(2)使用模板笔记记录 PDMP 使用情况,以及(3)将常规 PDMP 查询委托给辅助人员。

结论

尽管使用 PDMP 会带来时间和行政负担,但我们研究中的 VA 医生普遍支持 PDMP。将我们的研究结果应用于正在进行的 PDMP 实施工作中,可能会加强 PDMP 在 VA 内外的使用,并改善阿片类药物的安全处方。