Yilmaz Ilhan, Erdogan Uzay, Tanriverdi Osman, Gunaldi Omur, Adilay Utku, Omeroglu Muhammed, Tanik Canan, Tugcu Bekir
University of Health Sciences, sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Department of Neurosurgery, Istanbul, Turkey.
Turk Neurosurg. 2018;28(6):954-962. doi: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.22633-18.2.
To evaluate bevacizumab for epidural fibrosis (EF) treatment in an experimental rat model using histopathology as well as immunohistochemical staining for CD105 and osteopontin (OPN).
Sixteen Wistar Albino rats underwent either laminectomy alone to induce EF (group I, control) or laminectomy plus local bevacizumab treatment (group II). The degree of EF was compared between groups using the current histopathological grading method as well as immunohistochemistry for CD105 and OPN. In addition, the consistency of EF staging using CD105 and OPN expression was compared to that using histopathology.
The grade of EF was significantly lower in group II than in group I based on the fibroblast count and fibrosis density determined using histopathology, as well as by CD105 expression determined using immunohistochemistry. In contrast, OPN expression was not a reliable marker for EF evaluation because it did not show a significant difference between the two groups.
Bevacizumab prevents EF development as assessed using both histopathology and CD105 expression. CD105 is a potentially reliable marker for the immunohistochemical grading of EF, in contrast to OPN.
在实验性大鼠模型中,使用组织病理学以及针对CD105和骨桥蛋白(OPN)的免疫组织化学染色来评估贝伐单抗对硬膜外纤维化(EF)的治疗效果。
16只Wistar白化大鼠,一组仅接受椎板切除术以诱导EF(I组,对照组),另一组接受椎板切除术加局部贝伐单抗治疗(II组)。使用当前的组织病理学分级方法以及针对CD105和OPN的免疫组织化学方法比较两组之间的EF程度。此外,将使用CD105和OPN表达进行的EF分期与使用组织病理学进行的分期的一致性进行比较。
基于使用组织病理学确定的成纤维细胞计数和纤维化密度以及使用免疫组织化学确定的CD105表达,II组的EF分级明显低于I组。相比之下,OPN表达不是评估EF的可靠标志物,因为两组之间未显示出显著差异。
使用组织病理学和CD105表达评估,贝伐单抗可预防EF的发展。与OPN相比,CD105是EF免疫组织化学分级的潜在可靠标志物。