Gülzow Insa, Bartlitz Victoria, Kuehnast Milena, Golcher Felix, Bittner Dagmar
Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft,Berlin,Germany.
J Child Lang. 2018 Sep;45(5):1212-1226. doi: 10.1017/S0305000917000630. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
We analyzed the conversational corpora of two German and two English children to investigate how the different use types of the adversative connectives aber and but influence the probability of monologically versus dialogically constructed utterances in the first year of use. Our findings show that children produce adversative connectives mainly in dialogic structures for illocutionary and theme-management purposes, but that the use types of adversative connectives lead to a different distribution of monologic and dialogic clause combinations. The results suggest that monologic and dialogic realizations as a function of text type must be considered when describing the developmental trajectory of the different use types of adversative connectives.
我们分析了两名德国儿童和两名英国儿童的对话语料库，以研究转折连词aber和but的不同使用类型如何影响其使用第一年中独白式与对话式构建话语的概率。我们的研究结果表明，儿童主要在对话结构中出于言外行为和主题管理目的使用转折连词，但转折连词的使用类型导致了独白式和对话式从句组合的不同分布。结果表明，在描述转折连词不同使用类型的发展轨迹时，必须考虑作为文本类型函数的独白式和对话式实现方式。
